First of all, the post I replied to - before you jumped in - also mentioned the stadia of Chelsea, City and PSG. Secondly I'm talking about stadia in terms of their design, features and facilities, not about trophies won there or fan base or memories or who has played there. And thirdly, the sales value of naming rights is to do with the club as a whole and not just the stadium concerned.
Regardless of your condescending rant, I have many reasons right to think the new Spurs stadium is going to be awesome and better (not bigger, but better) than some of the stadia referred to. For example, it will have the largest single-tier stand ('kop') in the UK, bigger even than Borussia Dortmund’s ‘Yellow Wall’.
It has also been designed to bring the fans as close to the pitch as possible (closer than at any other modern stadium in the country) and has been acoustically engineered in several different ways to maximise the volume and longevity of the sound made by fans. These various acoustic features include a curved stadium roof, lined with aluminium to help bounce sound back towards the pitch, and even include fine tuning the acoustic properties of the material from which the seats are made.
There are in addition many other features: e.g. the sky lounge, a sky walk, a glass tunnel players entrance, a five-storey high glass atrium at the south end to provide a new focus for home supporters before and after the match, comfortable modern seating with more leg-room than at any other comparable ground in the UK, the longest general admission bar in any UK stadium, a micro-brewery, an in-house bakery ... the list goes on, and that's without even mentioning the many features and facilities outside of the stadium itself but within the stadium complex.
In general terms it's been designed to be much more than a place where fans just come to a match and then go home - it's intended to be a "day-long" experience.