I know, it’s amazing how many don’t know
I think we all know by now Geebs!
I know, it’s amazing how many don’t know
I know, it’s amazing how many don’t know
Think something like "avid Bissouma hater" should be added to @golden_blunder 's taglineI think we all know by now Geebs!
Is it not the case that's he hasn't actually been named?
Not really sure why this one isn't under caf embargoe considering we're told not to talk about Greenwood.
Great player.
If he was the difference between us being 2nd or 1st, or the difference between us losing a champions league final and winning it by all means pay the 100 mil. But for a club that needs to improve a good number of areas including needing multiple players for the midfield, I would be against spending north of 70 mil for him.
Multiple teams including pool, city, leicester, Brighton have shown you can find very good cdm/holding mids for less than 50mil. Exceptional ones like Kante are hard to find, good ones like rodri, fabinho, bissouma, ndidi, gueye etc are not as rare as we think. So we should focuse on buying young to mid 20s players for less than 50mil until we are in a place where we need that final 1 or 2 piece of the puzzle.
Agreed, he's world class no doubt about it.
There’d certainly be a cost! Not just financial
For every maguire there’s a Jordan Henderson to balance your argumentJesus wept. He’s a dull and tidy defensive midfielder for a team that will most likely finish 7th or 8th this season. A defensive team with a rigid counter-attacking formation, a perfect setup for such a player to look steady for 90 minutes. He’s not world-class, neither West Ham or England are anywhere close to giving us an indication of his ability as such as they are a few levels behind the top teams. He is obviously a very good player, but calling him world-class is just silly. Odds are he will join a bigger club and suddenly look a bit more average, as his technical side will be challenged just like with Harry Maguire. All the same things were said about him when he went from a smaller club to a bigger one, then his obvious lack of pace and movement was highlighted at once. Same will probably happen to Rice, his lack of register will be revealed and the 100M will look daft. You simply do not pay 100M for a slow and big player like him when top football is so quick and technical.
Jesus wept. He’s a dull and tidy defensive midfielder for a team that will most likely finish 7th or 8th this season. A defensive team with a rigid counter-attacking formation, a perfect setup for such a player to look steady for 90 minutes. He’s not world-class, neither West Ham or England are anywhere close to giving us an indication of his ability as such as they are a few levels behind the top teams. He is obviously a very good player, but calling him world-class is just silly. Odds are he will join a bigger club and suddenly look a bit more average, as his technical side will be challenged just like with Harry Maguire. All the same things were said about him when he went from a smaller club to a bigger one, then his obvious lack of pace and movement was highlighted at once. Same will probably happen to Rice, his lack of register will be revealed and the 100M will look daft. You simply do not pay 100M for a slow and big player like him when top football is so quick and technical.
West Ham were third in PL goals scored in 2021 I think.
Joint 6th with Leeds on 62 goals scored.
Behind :
Man City - 83
Man United - 73
Liverpool - 68
Leicester - 68
Tottenham - 68
Leeds - 62
West Ham - 62
Not bad, they do play defensive football though. Rice is in a system that suits him perfectly.
The people calling him a Roy Keane regen - did you see his celebration the other day? Can you imagine Keano doing that?
Garner is totally different from riceMy first choice signing along that french kid this summer. But I still dont think we should spend £100 mill on him. If we spend £100 mill on Rice and lose Pogba, we will be complaining that we need another Pogba next summer.
I do think there are good options out there. One would be to replace Bailly/Jones with a really good CB and play with three at the back more often. Instead of spending £100 mill on Rice we could then spend £30 mill om Haidara/Tielesman or similar. Might even give us funds to compete for Bellingham next summer. It would also give us abit of time to wait for James Garner who is really not that different from Rice. More of a talent on the ball, less mature off the ball, in my opinion.
I have been a big fan of Rice since I first saw him, but spending £100 mill just dont seem sensible in my opinion.
Garner is totally different from rice
The people calling him a Roy Keane regen - did you see his celebration the other day? Can you imagine Keano doing that?
Forest fan I spoke didn’t think Garner is a holding midfielder but actually box to box.He might be. Like Carrick was different to Keane, or Fabinho is very different from Rodri. But there is also similarities in what they will provide to their team. Garner, right now, plays a bit further up the pitch. He will not in a few years. He is a DM, that is for certain.
I would prefer to have just one of them in a team, and I am very confident that in time Garner will become a great DM.
I think he’s saying that like carrick and Keane it’s something that he could develop into. Which is fine,’possibly he will.Forest fan I spoke didn’t think Garner is a holding midfielder but actually box to box.
Id pay it if he drop kicked zouma across the room£100 mill on Rice ? not sure he is worthy of that price tag.
Matt Law thinks West Ham will sell for £80m and Tuchel would like the player in his team. Not sure Chelsea would pay the £80m though.
The same reason why Neymar cost 220m+ and the record for a defensive midfielder is Rodri at around 75m. Attackers are worth a lot more in transfer market.After City set the precedent for a young English talisman with years left on their contract, why would West Ham accept anything under £100m for him this summer? I really can’t imagine either Chelsea or United paying that.
No it isn't, you're paying an absolute premium. Kante, Fernandinho and Fabinho were bargains. Paying £80m for Rice is not.Need to go all in. 80M is a bargain for him. Best young DM in the world by far.
No it isn't, you're paying an absolute premium. Kante, Fernandinho and Fabinho were bargains. Paying £80m for Rice is not.
Need to go all in. 80M is a bargain for him. Best young DM in the world by far.
You can say it until you’re blue in the face but it objectively is not a bargain, it’s more than 100% of most club’s transfer budget. He’s not even a top 5 midfielder in the league. It’s a ludicrous fee.He absolutely is a bargain by the virtue of being just 23 and already bossing the midfield in the toughest league in the world. He can play for us for 8-10 years.
You can say it until you’re blue in the face but it objectively is not a bargain, it’s more than 100% of most club’s transfer budget. He’s not even a top 5 midfielder in the league. It’s a ludicrous fee.
He’s a top 5 CDM but the CDMs better than him all cost a hell of a lot less. There’s value in the market, we just need to exploit the market better.Do you find him to be a top 5 cdm of the league?
He’s a top 5 CDM but the CDMs better than him all cost a hell of a lot less. There’s value in the market, we just need to exploit the market better.
No it isn't, you're paying an absolute premium. Kante, Fernandinho and Fabinho were bargains. Paying £80m for Rice is not.
If Rice is available for 40m then it's a no brainer.How would you feel if we decided to buy Rice only after we fill our gaps first?
Say we postpone Rice to United until the 2023 january/summer window - and we first concentrate on replacing the creative CM in our team due to Pogba leaving, a new ST and possibly a RB.
Say we go for all those things first and only then go for Rice when his value won't effect our other transfers or future businesses.
How would you feel then?
In that scenario, I'd be more open to the idea, still not for £80m. The issue for me being that we categorically need a good DM this upcoming window, so signing everything else except a DM then signing one later on just makes for an unbalanced squad in my eyes, and will lead to another season similar to this one.How would you feel if we decided to buy Rice only after we fill our gaps first?
Say we postpone Rice to United until the 2023 january/summer window - and we first concentrate on replacing the creative CM in our team due to Pogba leaving, a new ST and possibly a RB.
Say we go for all those things first and only then go for Rice when his value won't effect our other transfers or future businesses.
How would you feel then?
In hindsight it turned out to be fantastic, which is what good scouting can do for you.£30M for 28 year old player from Ukrainian League in 2013 wasn't a bargain.
If Rice is available for 40m then it's a no brainer.
We've just made an english player who was excelling at another top 8 club the most expensive player in their position. Suddenly the pressure and expectations are ramped up and they might not take it well either.
Paying £80m will be a huge outlay and people will expect a lot more from him than just a few sideways passes and good interceptions.
I suspect if we hire a coach that likes to play 4-3-3 properly, they'll know what they're looking for and will find an alternative at a much better value.
Rice isn't the only CDM in the world that's for sure. A good solid player no doubt, but nothing that will revolutionise the side.