VP89
Pogba's biggest fan
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2015
- Messages
- 34,503
I'm still wary on Rice, not sure what is so great about him. Hope I'm wrong though.
Is Rice genuinely an upgrade to Fred and McTominay? And at least a 70M upgrade?
I'm still wary on Rice, not sure what is so great about him. Hope I'm wrong though.
I was watching him the other day and there was a simple pass between the lines to Lingard and he didn't even try to play it.
That really put me off him again. It's the kind of pass Carrick used to make with his eyes closed, this is the standard we should be aiming for.
Yeah, he's one of those players whose certainly good but I'm not seeing what he's going to offer over what we have.I was watching him the other day and there was a simple pass between the lines to Lingard and he didn't even try to play it.
That really put me off him again. It's the kind of pass Carrick used to make with his eyes closed, this is the standard we should be aiming for.
To me, there are things you just have or you don't.Could working with Carrick help improve that side of his game or should we looking elsewhere
To me, there are things you just have or you don't.
I don't think we should compromise on quality. Whoever are DM of choosing is should be someone that is creative. I don't think Rice is that player.
I’ve watched and posted about him a few times. Again my step son says he’s the best young player to come through for years and he’s a regular match goer.Yeah, he's one of those players whose certainly good but I'm not seeing what he's going to offer over what we have.
Honestly, same. Unless the plan is to play Rice as a proper holding midfielder in the no.6 role with two midfielders ahead of him — which there are no signs or indications of us ever doing — this signing makes zero sense to me.I'm still wary on Rice, not sure what is so great about him. Hope I'm wrong though.
I don’t understand the people who are trying to compare Carrick to Rice - they are two different players.
Carrick wasn’t making CL trophy winning performances until Hargreaves popped up next to him.
Pirlo won’t be playing next to Pogba and Bruno Fernandes - he needs Gattuso.
Xavi won’t be playing next to Pogba and Bruno either and needs Busquets.
De Bruyne and Silva won’t last in partnership with Carrick in comparison to Fernandinho.
Rice is being bought to be a ball winning CDM.
Our replacement like for like for Carrick should be a replacement or competition for Pogba.
For quite a while Carrick played in a midfield 2 with either scholes or Giggs. He was not the same sort of player as Pogba. I mean not at all. He was a very good passer, yes, but positional discipline, timing and reading of the game from a defensive point of view were his main strengths.I don’t understand the people who are trying to compare Carrick to Rice - they are two different players.
Carrick wasn’t making CL trophy winning performances until Hargreaves popped up next to him.
Pirlo won’t be playing next to Pogba and Bruno Fernandes - he needs Gattuso.
Xavi won’t be playing next to Pogba and Bruno either and needs Busquets.
De Bruyne and Silva won’t last in partnership with Carrick in comparison to Fernandinho.
Rice is being bought to be a ball winning CDM.
Our replacement like for like for Carrick should be a replacement or competition for Pogba.
Sell Fred and buy Kessie. Options would improveYou are right.
Pogba- Bruno
-----Rice------
DvdB- Bruno
------Rice-----
Bruno---McT
-----Rice----
------Bruno---
Fred----Rice
For quite a while Carrick played in a midfield 2 with either scholes or Giggs. He was not the same sort of player as Pogba. I mean not at all. He was a very good passer, yes, but positional discipline, timing and reading of the game from a defensive point of view were his main strengths.
He was not like Rice either but, in terms of his role, he was more similar to Rice than to Pogba.
Carrick is much more comparable to Busquets than Xavi. Carrick was excellent at shielding the defence and read the game beautifully. Hargreaves played at most 15 or 20 games in midfield next to Carrick in a 7 year period we won the league 5 times and a four year period where we reached the Champions League final 3 times and went out in the semi finals once.
Is Rice genuinely an upgrade to Fred and McTominay? And at least a 70M upgrade?
If we're buying Rice to use him in a double pivot next to Fred or McTominay, we're going nowhere next season.
I remember Carricks interception stats being out of this world, excellent reader of the game and passer. Miss him a lot.
Tackles Attempted | Tackles Won | Interceptions | |
2009-10 | 2.9 | 2.3 | 2 |
2010-11 | 3.2 | 2.2 | 2.6 |
2011-12 | 3.8 | 3 | 2.5 |
2012-13 | 3.4 | 2.3 | 2.2 |
2013-14 | 2.9 | 2.1 | 3 |
Career Average - PL+CL+Europa | |||
3.4 | 2.4 | 2.5 |
trust your gut, there’s been plenty of hype over english players before.Not based on what I have seen from Rice, Fred and McT. But the Hype for Rice is so overwhelming that I am starting to question myself.
They’re not comparable in terms of playing styles, I agree with that but you’re reducing Carrick’s game down to his ability on the ball which is completely wrong. The best way to explain his defensive work is using Vidic and Ferdinand as comparisons. You have players like Vidic who impose themselves on the game, they’re aggressive and like go in to every challenge with 110% commitment. Then you have players like Ferdinand who play the game in their head. Half the danger is countered by their positioning and they are cool and calm enough in most situations to hold off in a tackle and pacify the player into dead positions. They block angles, they wait for their moment and toe the ball away.For Me Carrick’s most similar player is Xabi Alonso.
He is a CDM but he is a deep lying playmaker rather than a CDM ball winner that gives the team an element of central stability.
I don’t think Carrick is similar to Busquets (though I understand he has a better pass than Rice) - I just don’t see how Carrick, Xavi and Iniesta would be as anywhere near as consistent and defensively stable with a player like Carrick over Busquets.
It’s why even if Spain used Xavi, Iniesta & Xabi Alonso- they would routinely end up using players like Senna and Busquets aswell to provide that stability.
For me a Carrick type player doesn’t add a pure stability like a player like Rice does - what they do is add an element of tempo, creativity and intelligence to the Deeper areas of the pitch.
I can see why people crave that when we have McFred as our current partnership - but I won’t put down the importance of replacing Matic’s role in the squad for an element of defensive stability than deep lying creativity.
Depends.
If we only sign Rice then that's a reasonable view, but if we also sign a good centre back and an experienced creative right winger then its a great summer and we are looking good.
Rice is a very solid upgrade on Fred as a defensive midfielder and would allow McTominay to push up into the opposition's area where he is a goal threat. If he were to play with Fred it would free him to harry and press, while we pick off the interceptions, which is Fred's only real plus point, in my view.
We're very weak to the counter and at set pieces, Rice would be a good addition to organising against both, as well as being strong in the air so a naturally better player for defending set pieces than Pogba or Fred.
I'm just not a fan of Rice of at all from the few times I watched. I don't think he passes between the lines well enough nor do I think he's a good ball carrier from deep.
I would hope Ole targeting him means he wants to ditch the double pivot in midfield.
I don't think Rice/Fred nor Rice/McTominay in midfield is good enough.
I would love to be wrong on Rice though.
If we are dropping the double pivot then we will need another midfielder as well as RiceI'm just not a fan of Rice of at all from the few times I watched. I don't think he passes between the lines well enough nor do I think he's a good ball carrier from deep.
I would hope Ole targeting him means he wants to ditch the double pivot in midfield.
I don't think Rice/Fred nor Rice/McTominay in midfield is good enough.
I would love to be wrong on Rice though.
I think my worry is that player simply isn't available in the market right now so we'll settle for someone like Rice. For me we're looking for a Casemeiro or a Fabinho and I just can't think of a player in the market who is even close to that level.To me, there are things you just have or you don't.
I don't think we should compromise on quality. Whoever are DM of choosing is should be someone that is creative. I don't think Rice is that player.
He’s way better than McT & Fred on the ball. He’s not worth the money touted, but English/PL/United tax all apply.I really hope we don't sign Rice. For the money being touted, you want the finished article that's going to boss the midfield. All the top CDM's are so much better on the ball than Rice, I don't see what he'll bring that's different from the mediocrity that Fred and McTominay serve up to us on the ball?
I would rather spend that money on the likes of Neves and Camavinga, they probably wouldn't cost much more combined than Rice will go for, and he's just not worth it in my view. He's nowhere near as good as Fabinho, Casemiro, De Jong, Kimmich, Verrati, Rodri, Fernandinho (even at 35) but we'd end up paying top dollar for him.
I hate the idea that we can compete at the highest level with midfielders who aren't good enough on the ball. It's just not the case whatsoever, regardless of whether Rice will play in a pivot, holding midfielder, destroyer or whatever you want to call him. It's painfully obvious all season that we need someone who can start attacks from deep, and Rice is not the answer to that.
Not way better, not at allHe’s way better than McT & Fred on the ball. He’s not worth the money touted, but English/PL/United tax all apply.
I have to agree he is somewhat better than each of them at most (but not all) things.Not way better, not at all
Haven't they already got Ziyech, Werner , Chilwell and Silva and where interested in Havertz when Lampard was moaning about Rice?If Chelsea want him and Roman approves the deal this time that’s that. Slap in the face to Lampard though.
I'd heard he was a Chelsea fan and best mates with Mount, but I didn't realize he was in their academy until he was 15.
But signing a DM isnt adding nuance, its changing how we play. What use is Rice when Maguire and another are stepping beyond him with the ball?I have to agree he is somewhat better than each of them at most (but not all) things.
Paired with either of them, he would improve us, if played as a 6 with McT or Fred as an 8, in broad terms.
Finishing second shows we are not miles away now. Granted, it’s a fairly big step to start delivering the consistency of City (or Liverpool the year before) but really we are looking at any marginal improvements as being worthwhile.
CM especially in defensive areas has been a weakness. A little more nous, composure and leadership in there will yield a lot of gains over the course of a season. It won’t be spectacular but could be worth 10 points, easy.
Yeah just maybe these links to Chelsea will actually push us to look outside of him and the Premier League in general, hasn't been concrete links to anyone else in this position and it's worrying to say the least. Do think there could well be something in what Romano was saying about a CDM hinging on what happens with Pogba & Donny.