Wrong thread, but such a bollocks opinion. De Gea at his best was the world’s best keeper. I know it’s funny to dish out sentences like ‘He is a keeper that makes great saves’ as if it was analogous to ‘but a scorer of great goals’, but it really is the most important part of the job of goalkeeping. De Gea didn’t make a few highlight reels moments, he made saves all the time, every game, of every kind, he didn’t let in howlers, and he didn’t let in the kind of very good efforts that most good keepers let in on a weekly basis. For years. For a backline, that is golden security, which Van Gaal and Mourinho, while despairing over the limitations of Uniteds central defenders, was thankful for.
In addition to that, he was not a TV keeper. He had the best movement and positioning I have ever seen in a keeper, maybe barring Buffon. He was good enough in distribution, and ironed out his flaws in dealing with aerial duels to a decent level for many years. No keeper I have watched was perfect, but keeping the ball from going in the net is the bread and butter of the best keepers, and De Gea was head and shoulders above others in that respect.
Now, he is nowhere near that level, and he is still not a bad keeper, just not a particularily good one. But he has declined, no doubt, in all facets of the game. Unlike Schmeichel, whose best years was from 28-35, and Van der Sar 32-39, De Gea’s prime has been from 22-28. If that’s it, it’s a brilliant run. No kind of crazy revisionism and memory loss can change that.