lex talionis
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2017
- Messages
- 15,895
Shots saved/not saved is a misleading stat. The case against De Gea has merit, but not yet n account of his alleged collapse as a shot stopper.
That is not true and has been proven many times this season in this thread. He is below average shot stopper compared to league average.Shots saved/not saved is a misleading stat. The case against De Gea has merit, but not yet n account of his alleged collapse as a shot stopper.
Reaction saves off defleticons etc too.You mean the long range efforts that were straight at him? Yeah any PL keeper saves those
There was actually one save that ASM hit with venom that was hard and low he held onto but the only reason that happened is, you guessed it, De Gea was rooted to his line once again as a cross got floated in
If you're talking about the deflection off Lindelof, it deflected near the edge of the box and directed the ball straight at De Gea. It was a routine tip over the bar that any PL keeper makes. Hardly a showcase of insane reactions and if that goes in you're talking about how De Gea needs to do better considering it's straight at him.Reaction saves off defleticons etc too.
Honestly don’t think this is the game you point towards as him not doing well
Seriously??? You expected DDG to catch that ball? Are you serious? The ball was hit with venom and it was above his head - only Sunday league goalkeepers will try to catch that. He did the right thing by tipping it over. Perhaps had Maguire tried to do the same with the corner, we would not have conceded....I have no problem with the goal. My problem was with the corner kick that lead to it. A shot straight down the middle and De Gea decides to go all Hollywood and tips it over while that was an easily catchable shot. It was straight at De Gea. He catches, then there's no corner kick. No need to kick his legs out like a dive and tip it over with one hand. It's right at him. All it needs is a little jump and two hands to catch it. A couple minutes later their keeper made the save the way De Gea should have on Fred's shot. There were also a couple of balls that he should have come for that he didn't. But all in all, this isn't the performance to give De Gea the yank. Other than what I've mentioned he was decent today...
Seriously??? You expected DDG to catch that ball? Are you serious? The ball was hit with venom and it was above his head - only Sunday league goalkeepers will try to catch that. He did the right thing by tipping it over. Perhaps had Maguire tried to do the same with the corner, we would not have conceded....
Agreed. Henderson is in constant communication with his defenders and instills confidence and at the very least coordination with his teammates.I don't blame him for the goal. But with someone more commanding our defense would be under less pressure too. The defense would make less mistakes too.
People blaming him for not stopping that vicious volley shot is absolutely
Shots saved/not saved is a misleading stat. The case against De Gea has merit, but not yet n account of his alleged collapse as a shot stopper.
Can't remember if his distribution was always this flaky, but it definitely seems to have gotten worse. The entire defence seems to go to panic stations when De Gea has the ball at his feet, and you can't really blame them as there's no telling what he'll do. He could pass to an opponent, kick it straight out of play, or ping the ball to one of our players at a pace that's almost impossible to control. Either is a danger and the sport has evolved to such an extent that most rival keepers are good on the ball; some can even create chances from deep.His distribution is terrible at times, too often he kicks it straight to an opposition player and right away we’re under pressure deep in our own half. It’s so annoying because it’s needless, we’re just making it so much harder for ourselves.
Nice post. On the last part, Henderson looks a lot more comfortable playing out from the back than De Gea. I thought that was going to be a weakness for Henderson based on prior comments re Sheff Utd and his league debut but it actually looks a real strength and is also an obvious weakness for DDG.Shot save percentage does reward those keepers that get the chance to save a lot of long distance shots and other low percentage attempts. Most stats need to be viewed in context.
Post-shot expected goals minus goals allowed is a useful stat to assess a keeper's shot saving ability. It gives far more weight to saving a close range shot than a long distance shot. It only takes into consideration shots that were on target. If necessary, you can adjust it according to mins played or even some measure of shot volume faced.
The season we finished 2nd under Mourinho is the first season there is data for post-shot expected goals minus goals allowed. De Gea + 7.9 This means he conceded almost 8 goals fewer than you'd expect from those shots that were on target. The following season his figure was + 0.9, then + 2.1, currently - 1.5 (though not updated with Newcastle game). There is the decline from elite shot stopper to ordinary.
Taking this season's figures as a guide (in some cases the latest match not included): Nick Pope + 7.3, Martinez + 6.7, Areola + 6.2, Schmeichel + 4.6, Lloris + 4.1, Sanchez + 4.1, Leno + 3.1, Ederson + 2.3, Sam Johnstone + 1.9, then there are a few keepers who have not played many games, as well as Fabianski + 1.7, Alisson + 1.5. De Gea's - 1.5 isn't the worst figure but it really doesn't look great at all.
Last season: Dubravka + 10.0, Lloris + 7.3, Guaita + 6.8, McCarthy + 6.5, Leno + 6.1, Henderson + 5.2, Martinez + 3.9, Ryan + 3.5, Schmeichel + 3.2, Ederson + 2.5, De Gea + 2.1
The Mourinho/Solskjaer season there are 7 regular keepers ahead of De Gea's + 0.9 including several (Alisson, Ederson, Leno, Lloris) from top teams that face fewer shots. Fabianski + 11.6 and Lloris + 11.3 were the stars that season, followed by a group of keepers around + 4.
Ideally you'd want to adjust those figures so that a good keeper who faces tons of shots doesn't surge into the distance compared to an equally good keeper who plays for a team that limits their opponent's chances. One approach might be to ignore the keepers involved in the relegation battle and simply compare De Gea to keepers from the top 10 or top 12 sides.
https://fbref.com/en/comps/9/keepersadv/Premier-League-Stats#all_stats_keeper_adv
I think it is wise to look at 4 or 5 stats when assessing keepers. The percentage of crosses they claim is worth noting, as is the number of sweeper keeper actions per game. Passing is more difficult to assess as some teams play out from the back, while others launch the ball up the pitch at the first opportunity. The case for De Gea over Henderson probably relies heavily on their respective ability to play out from the back. (Personally, I'm not convinced it is sufficient to justify De Gea's selection but if you get to see them in training, it may be more clear cut)
Shot save percentage does reward those keepers that get the chance to save a lot of long distance shots and other low percentage attempts. Most stats need to be viewed in context.
Post-shot expected goals minus goals allowed is a useful stat to assess a keeper's shot saving ability. It gives far more weight to saving a close range shot than a long distance shot. It only takes into consideration shots that were on target. If necessary, you can adjust it according to mins played or even some measure of shot volume faced.
The season we finished 2nd under Mourinho is the first season there is data for post-shot expected goals minus goals allowed. De Gea + 7.9 This means he conceded almost 8 goals fewer than you'd expect from those shots that were on target. The following season his figure was + 0.9, then + 2.1, currently - 1.5 (though not updated with Newcastle game). There is the decline from elite shot stopper to ordinary.
Taking this season's figures as a guide (in some cases the latest match not included): Nick Pope + 7.3, Martinez + 6.7, Areola + 6.2, Schmeichel + 4.6, Lloris + 4.1, Sanchez + 4.1, Leno + 3.1, Ederson + 2.3, Sam Johnstone + 1.9, then there are a few keepers who have not played many games, as well as Fabianski + 1.7, Alisson + 1.5. De Gea's - 1.5 isn't the worst figure but it really doesn't look great at all.
Last season: Dubravka + 10.0, Lloris + 7.3, Guaita + 6.8, McCarthy + 6.5, Leno + 6.1, Henderson + 5.2, Martinez + 3.9, Ryan + 3.5, Schmeichel + 3.2, Ederson + 2.5, De Gea + 2.1
The Mourinho/Solskjaer season there are 7 regular keepers ahead of De Gea's + 0.9 including several (Alisson, Ederson, Leno, Lloris) from top teams that face fewer shots. Fabianski + 11.6 and Lloris + 11.3 were the stars that season, followed by a group of keepers around + 4.
Ideally you'd want to adjust those figures so that a good keeper who faces tons of shots doesn't surge into the distance compared to an equally good keeper who plays for a team that limits their opponent's chances. One approach might be to ignore the keepers involved in the relegation battle and simply compare De Gea to keepers from the top 10 or top 12 sides.
https://fbref.com/en/comps/9/keepersadv/Premier-League-Stats#all_stats_keeper_adv
I think it is wise to look at 4 or 5 stats when assessing keepers. The percentage of crosses they claim is worth noting, as is the number of sweeper keeper actions per game. Passing is more difficult to assess as some teams play out from the back, while others launch the ball up the pitch at the first opportunity. The case for De Gea over Henderson probably relies heavily on their respective ability to play out from the back. (Personally, I'm not convinced it is sufficient to justify De Gea's selection but if you get to see them in training, it may be more clear cut)
I know it's probably counterproductive to the backline to have keepers swapping and changing too often, but why don't we use Henderson in the games where we know the opposition will be looking for high balls into the box and set pieces?
Leave De Gea in goal for the teams likely to shoot from open play/the ground. We could actually turn this into a positive position to be in.
Excellent post. But of course player management decisions are always more complicated than what the stats, which can be misleading no matter how finely calibrated they may be, tell us.
Each of can come to our own conclusion on this, but the question really whether Henderson is ready to take over as our first choice keeper and the answer is clearly no. Unlike most outfield players who can be swapped in and out without disrupting rhythm too much, the keeper plays such a huge role in how defenders make decisions that lead — or hopefully not lead — to goals conceded. Maguire et al know De Gea will not go beyond the six yard box to collect a cross...Henderson will. Neither is inherently the right or wrong philosophy (for lack of a better term). Maguire et all know De Gea is a better shot stopper. The tendencies, strengths and weaknesses of keepers has an impact on the behavior of defenders and you don’t want to disrupt that in mid season.
Ole has it right in playing Dave in PL and Dean in the cup ties. Going into next season, it’s fair game to have both compete for top keeper.
As for how we got here, I would just say we need to show a lot more respect for a keeper who kept us well above the bottom half of the table while we had some seriously shit chop/change back lines. What Dave did for us during those years was nothing short of sensational.
Taking crosses - 19th in the league (4.1% claimed)
Wow that's really damning. Watching Henderson regularly claim crosses feels so strange. My eyes are not used to that from my keeper.
What's this guy been doing in training the past decade.
Out of interest, what makes you say this? Only the stats clearly show Henderson has been the better shot stopper over the last two seasons.
This season? When?Not checked any stats. Going on what I've seen. Some of the saves he pulls off are incredible.
This season? When?
There have only been two times this season I've thought that he pulled off a save that an average keeper probably wouldn't have done, and one of them was a save with his legs (which is something he is still fairly good at). That leaves just one truly fantastic flying save, but even that was no better than other keepers pull off every now and then. Just off the top of my head I would say that Leno's save from Fred in our recent Arsenal match was better than any save De Gea has done this season, and I don't rate him particularly highly either.