laughtersassassin
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2014
- Messages
- 11,878
That’s because he is not tied up in the Nations League….
We were never seriously in for him either.
There's always an excuse with us and that's the issue
That’s because he is not tied up in the Nations League….
We were never seriously in for him either.
We're still drafting up our proposal to benficaWell done to Liverpool, in just 3 days they have completed this deal from talking to making bid to here we go, meanwhile at Manchester United .....
I think this is going to be 80m down the drain for Liverpool. Have you seen his first touch on the ball? It is much worse than Lukaku. He might be a goalmachine in a league like the Portuguese. But his 2nd touch will often be a tackle in PL. Often you also see players who are dominant and score many goals in the Championship, but as soon as they get into the PL, it stops. I think this pretty much will be the same story.
I was very skeptical when we were put in touch with him. So I'm just happy that Liverpool have paid such a high a price.
These situations in the video are from just one season - and in the Portguese league....
Striker is very expensive in today's market and that's why Haaland is such a good deal for City no matter how much sign on fee City needed to pay. Liverpool still need to pay sign on fee and agent fee on top of transfer fee for Darwin Nunez.The fee is insane. Im sure we were interested but not for that price. We will look foolish if he ends up being world class though, but I don’t see anyone else in for him either.
It only looks foolish if you buy into social media nonsense. It's clear that currently Pool are a better proposition and also clear that 100million on a striker is too much for this summer. People who think we should just spend 300 million in one summer are very out of touch.The fee is insane. Im sure we were interested but not for that price. We will look foolish if he ends up being world class though, but I don’t see anyone else in for him either.
What the feck have we come to when darwin nunez cost 100 million...
I remember Klopp being shocked with Pogba's price back in the day, yet he doesn't have a problem spending big again.
That's a win-win for me.Scousers.
All transfers are a gamble but if I was a scouser, I’d be backing the deal purely because of Klopp, he’ll turn him into a top talent as he has done with most of their team. Goes to show how important manager/coach are, players are secondary.
Player quality is definitely more important than having a good manager. (Not that you don’t need both obviously.)All transfers are a gamble but if I was a scouser, I’d be backing the deal purely because of Klopp, he’ll turn him into a top talent as he has done with most of their team. Goes to show how important manager/coach are, players are secondary.
And how Klopp works miracles on a budgetThe press will build him up as the next R9 and how it’s shrewd business by Liverpool
Still working with the Coutinho money. He is a smooth operator.And how Klopp works miracles on a budget
That (almost) got them Fabinho, Keita and Allison.Still working with the Coutinho money. He is a smooth operator.
Personally I thought the price was ridiculously high, regardless of how high Benfica rated him, yes he has scored a few goals in the Primera Liga and a couple against top teams in Europe, but the premier league is the toughest league in the world for a reason. Had the price been a lot lower €60 million for example then maybe…..maybe that could be acceptable, but €80 million plus addons taking it to €100? I mean you only have to look to Lukaku. I’m glad we haven’t pulled the trigger at that price, we are meant to be moving away from that, this price tag is reserved for universally proven players with little risk.
Liverpool getting 40 50m for Mane so actual fee is more 30 40M and they getting 8 year younger replacement. Liverpool do not mess around these days.
Liverpool getting 40 50m for Mane so actual fee is more 30 40M and they getting 8 year younger replacement. Liverpool do not mess around these days.
He was very good though , it’s not like Diaz was playing poorly. Everyone knew how good he was he was just adding end product on a more consistent basis.Ruben Dias to City for £61m two years after Felix.
Luis Diaz actually also only "produced in one season", and that was the first part of the 21/22 season. The two full seasons before that he had 6 goals and 5 assists in both seasons, not exactly great stats.
I’ve been saying this, the numbers are good but even pizzi scores 21 goals and 15 assists for Benfica. Cardozo was better etc.Jesus….serious Lusaka vibes. I wonder if they’ve reacted to City signing Haaland. Could be a mistake.
Hahaha. Love it !Liverpool getting 40 50m for Mane so actual fee is more 30 40M and they getting 8 year younger replacement. Liverpool do not mess around these days.
Well no if we're doing this logic you're signing nunez for around 40 million but losing Mane on a free.Liverpool getting 40 50m for Mane so actual fee is more 30 40M and they getting 8 year younger replacement. Liverpool do not mess around these days.
All this Nunez and Haaland talk is funny. I can't believe what I'm reading. Now we're supposed to be scared of bang average, limited players. Stop buying into the media hype and use your eyes.
Julian Alvarez is a striker that everyone should fear. A better and more versatile/complete player than both Nunez and Haaland.