Zlatattack
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2017
- Messages
- 7,374
he was definitely a better wide attacker than Lingard
I don't disagree, but the amount of games he has missed has been staggering. Was he this injury prone at United?
No he was not. Arsenal is a curse for Englishmen these days.I don't disagree, but the amount of games he has missed has been staggering. Was he this injury prone at United?
He's a much poorer striker than all of them though, and that is a positive for rival teams if he is starting as Arsenal's main striker.He'll be missed by Arsenal. Despite the unbridled joy on here every time he misses a chance he's actually missed fewer "big chances" than Kane, Aguero and Lukaku and his off the ball work has been outstanding.
Was browsing through Am.
Every single post slating him and begging to get rid.
Pretty sad how his career has panned out.
Will be 28 this year. How time flies.
Was browsing through Am.
Every single post slating him and begging to get rid.
Pretty sad how his career has panned out.
Will be 28 this year. How time flies.
didn't leave because he wanted to
Do we still have to start on this part all over?Still think he was a really good player for us, and I was sad when we sold him. Injuries set him back at Arsenal. He could have had a very good career if some fine margins had gone his way.
Always found it disgusting how some people on here enjoyed watching him fail. He was a Manchester lad, always tried his hardest, generally did well for us and didn't leave because he wanted to. Doesn't deserve the ridicule.
The smoke of him wanting out was already there during Moyes' season LVG just accelerated thing but didn't mean he has to go if he's not persistent on being a forwards.He left because Van Gaal made it very clear to him he was going to be fifth choice behind Van Persie, Rooney, Falcao and Wilson.
It was heavily reported and suggested to be the case at the time so I don't know why it's getting rehashed.
On a footballing level, he's had some shocking injuries. I'm amazed he's now 28.
Who needs Sanchez when you have this type of creative prowess around the final third?
Who needs Sanchez when you have this type of creative prowess around the final third?
We'll never actually know for sure. It's not really that relevant to the point I was making.i thought that's exactly what he did
Who needs Sanchez when you have this type of creative prowess around the final third?
Agree with the rest, but the bolded bit simply isn’t trueStill think he was a really good player for us, and I was sad when we sold him. Injuries set him back at Arsenal. He could have had a very good career if some fine margins had gone his way.
Always found it disgusting how some people on here enjoyed watching him fail. He was a Manchester lad, always tried his hardest, generally did well for us and didn't leave because he wanted to. Doesn't deserve the ridicule.
That's what I thought, he was in the England squad and wanted regular game time which LvG would not guarantee him. It's sad when you see how hard Lingard has worked and now is a valuable member of the squad and get's vital goal for the team. Danny wanted what he thought was the easy route and it has all gone wrong for him.i thought that's exactly what he did
I reckon he should be converted to a wide midfielder and not a striker. He's never been consistent in front of goal, but could beat man.
Who needs Sanchez when you have this type of creative prowess around the final third?
Who needs Sanchez when you have this type of creative prowess around the final third?
He might be average but I think he can be a useful player if you know how to use him. I don't think Arsenal used him properly like how Sir Alex used him. IMO his best position is 2nd striker, Sir Alex was able to get the best out of him against Real Madrid in that role. You can't expect him to be creative player to create chance for their no 9 Lacazatte, he can't cross & pass!
However, he's just injury prone and I'm glad we sold him with a good amount of money, I thought we were wrong.
So what does he do if he’s a forward and he can’t cross, can’t pass and can’t finish? All he’s got going for him is his pace and work-rate, he’ll stretch the play running the channels but that’s about it. He’s basically everything people complained Lingard was before his recent form, but without the technique.
Like I said before he can be useful player. You can use him to mark player and close down player like Xabi Alonso.
So essentially he's a ST who's useless with the ball and who's only redeeming quality is that of a CB.
He is utter shite.
There was someone on here having a go at me calling me clueless when I said he was going to be shipped out.
They said “He is going to stay here for the rest of his career, and go on to be a top striker”
To which i said, “will he feck, he is our Shola Ameobi, in fact, he will struggle to score as many league goals as Ameobi and will be sold within the year”.
Shola Ameobi scored 43 premiership goals in his career, and 94 goals total.
Danny Welbeck is 28 and has scored 31 premier league goals.
Assuming he keeps up his steller average of 3.4 league goals a season he might beat Ameobis premier league tally by the time he is 32.
I remember the terms defensive winger and defensive forward being used to describe him at one point.