Bojan11
Full Member
- Joined
- May 16, 2010
- Messages
- 33,183
What is this nonsense about Barca? He wouldn’t get in their team. The only reason they probably want him is because they need backups and he’d be cheap.
Yes, Barcelona would change their formation to 3 at the back to accommodate Blind. We're reaching levels of delusion that shouldn't be possible.
I'll stop here, thanks.
When playing 3 at the back there is no need for 3 pure CB's - I don't care what Lindelof is called; but I have yet seen his ball playing ability even though I have heard about it at benfica.
1) the RCB & LCB of the back 3 should be in a partnership as if they were playing in a traditional back 4.
2) the central defender is allowed to defend high up in midfield or drop back to defence likewise attacking wise he can take the ball in to midfield himself or play passes deep from the back line.
LINDELOF can pass but he has yet to show me any indication of being able to be a CDM/CB player.
Compare what Dier did for spurs in between their back 2 to make their back 3; he would make significant plays forward. Whilst Dier & Blind can do the same job in different manner : one likes to drive forward whilst the other positions himself along the back line and plays the ball forward.
LINDELOF is a good defender but we need more than just a CB in defence when playing 3cb. It's the same reason that Lingard is better than mata pr mkhitarayan behind a back 2 because he repositions himself along the front line meaning we always over do their defence because of an extra player who plays a SS/Cam role can drop in to the holes across the front 2 as well as a player that can drop in to midfield and even on top of that he can play the furthest forward to apply pressure. This is called a forward pivot where Lingard movement directly effects the position of our attacking players in to the most relevant position.
Just making stuff up again ; I said if they wanted to they would not how to utilise blind in a back 3 instead of a back 2.
Thank god that ended
Even his own Dad who actually played in that position didn’t choose to play him there when he was his manager and no other manager seems to rate him a here either. Can’t really criticise Jose for doing what everyone else has done with Blind.
I really don't need a breakdown of how a 3 person defense works to know that we have played with one multiple times this season and mostly without blind as one of the CB's and managed just fine. Lindelof is well known for being able to perform at CB as well as RB and CDM, During his time with Benfica (CDM at a stretch) and Tuanzebe can do CB and CDM which renders your point about Blind invalid as both of those two can perform CDM and also are far better defenders than Blind.
Here is a link to an MEN article with quotes from both Mourinho and one of Victor's former coaches talking about his expectation and his positional history:
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co...ll-news/man-utd-news-victor-lindelof-13612084
So you see as much as you may try to make a case for keeping Blind we already have good ball playing CB's in Lindelof (if you read the article Mourinho acknowledges this himself whilst make a few of the same point you have about becoming overly defensive with 3 CB's) and Tuanzebe and so Blind is surplus to requirements as he is defensively our weakest option there.
Was Danny there when after blind played CB? Don't think so - so I will go on blaming Jose thanks. Just rewriting history to your own benefit
He was the Dutch national manager so yes he was, what I said was actually based on fact, might have to look at yourself in terms of rewriting history.
They don't play with 3 at the back?
Again Lindelof is more defensive than Blind in an already defensive formation & blind's attacking ability is better than tuenzebes & Lindelof' s combined which is what we need in the centre - not just a defender who can pass for now; when we see him able to do that then he can rightfully take over blind. Why we need more defensive players at 3 at the back when we do fine with 2 is the question?
When they did he didn’t play him there and he didn’t see his own son as a CB, managers see Blind as a utility player, your whole argument is based on your own theory and nothing else. Can’t criticise Jose for using Blind correctly.
He gets better though. You gotta give him some time. He has not been playing for awhile let alone in the midfield.
Good tackle. Don't think he's been that good, though.