Count Orduck
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2012
- Messages
- 7,090
Name me one midfielder that was great defensively who was weak and slow.
Makalele?
Name me one midfielder that was great defensively who was weak and slow.
Busquets, Carrick... Not weak, Blind isn't weak either, he's just not a "tank" like Matic.Name me one midfielder that was great defensively who was weak and slow.
Makalele?
Bizarre comment agreed. We only paid £7m for Vidic so he wasn't a top player either.And how the feck does it matter as we didn't pay 30 mln quid for him either?
Busquets, Carrick... Not weak, Blind isn't weak either, he's just not a "tank" like Matic.
Busquets and carrick aren't great defensively. Blind is weak, he offers no physical presence at all, terrible athlete.Busquets, Carrick... Not weak, Blind isn't weak either, he's just not a "tank" like Matic.
You're having a laugh if you think Makalele was weak.Makalele?
Busquets and carrick aren't great defensively. Blind is weak, he offers no physical presence at all, terrible athlete.
You're having a laugh if you think Makalele was weak.
You're having a laugh if you think Makalele was weak.
Busquets and carrick aren't great defensively. Blind is weak, he offers no physical presence at all, terrible athlete.
No wonder you think Blind cant defend then
I'm comparing him in relation to Carrick although maybe that's unfair in itself. Carrick didn't tend to get caught behind the play as much as Blind seems to do and I put that down to Carrick's positioning. I don't think he's playing box to box at all and his role is clearly a lot more restrained that Herrera's.
The more I watch Blind, the more it appears that he's not an actual holding midfielder. He looks like a conventional CM playing out of position.
His passing and general positive play is something I like about him.
His performances have been slightly overrated - which comes as no surprise as he is a fan favourite, it seems like some fans are buying into the player rather than his performances, he hasn't been terrible though and its still his first season
His performances have been slightly overrated - which comes as no surprise as he is a fan favourite, it seems like some fans are buying into the player rather than his performances, he hasn't been terrible though and its still his first season
Yea or actually fans are buying into him through his good performances.
Or nah, we all just want to shag him because he's pretty.
Yea or actually fans are buying into him through his good performances.
Or nah, we all just want to shag him because he's pretty.
Your words not mine.
He has had some good performances but he has also been shocking in some games - but he didn't get any stick
Makalele?
Only 5'11, same as Blind. Not having that. Needs to be at least 6'2.Let's buy Akinfewa, play him as DM and settle this once for all.
Who cares who's bigger, who's got more strength is something else altogether. Its a balance thing when it comes to football, not just size. Sterling despite being tiny is made of some sturdy stuff, in a 50-50 with Gervinho for example the winner wouldn't be the bigger, heavier guy.Well, Blind is taller and weighs more than Makelele. Who can bench press more? Haven't a clue, but Blind isn't weak.
I think people expect him to sit deep and defend deep and rely on positioning like Carrick does just because they have similar responsibilities in our build up play. Blind clearly has been given the freedom to be proactive and press instead of backing off like Carrick does. We are always going to have those occasional moments where both get caught with a Blind-Herrera midfield because both are proactive with their pressing in the opposition half. Adding Carrick and going to three in midfield could add a lot of balance to our midfield defensively, because Blind and Herrera could go with their natural instincts and still have cover.He's not playing as a defensive midfielder though. He's playing more or less as a "box to box" centre mid in essentially exactly the same role as Herrera, in a partnership that's not much different to Keane-Scholes in roles. Keane got caught behind the ball a lot too when he played in that kind of setup because of the nature of it - you can't be everywhere at once, and if you're going to take the positive approach and drive the team up the pitch then you will leave gaps in behind that on occasion you'll be chasing back to cover off. I think you're being very unfair. If he was told to sit and track runners and close off spaces in front of the defence and he wasn't doing it then that'd be a reasonable criticism, but that's clearly not what he's doing and presumably he's not being told to do that otherwise he wouldn't be a mainstay in the team.
I like his approach personally. It's ballsy, it's positive, it's proactive. It's the kind of things many people were looking for when they were complaining about the many, many times when we just sat back and soaked up pressure in our own half.
Defensively, he's just not up to it. The number of times he gets caught behind the ball is criminal and something Fellaini was torn apart for last season.
Can't believe people say he's poor defensively. Wtf
Only Man. Utd. fans can make such arguments. I think most of them still want a Keane-like midfielder, and seeing midfielders like Matic, Wanyama, Schneiderlin, etc., makes them want these sort of players even more than those who aren't physically strong.
Busquets and carrick aren't great defensively. Blind is weak, he offers no physical presence at all, terrible athlete.
It's almost like reading criticism of Carrick from 5/6 years back. Ridiculous.
He was not weak or slow.