Massive Spanner
The Football Wrench
he's pretty good at football, sort of, but watching him is like doing a replay on FIFA and putting it to 0.5x speed, except everyone else is still at normal speed other than him.
Played well - unlucky with the shot that hit smalling. I think that was curling in. Typical of our luck at the minute.
I thought he started well, which was a bit of a surprise given he had a long world cup. But faded after Feb. He was almost reinvigorated by moving to LB but i still thought that burst of energy he had at the start had faded.Feel like he's been retrospectively downgraded by a lot of people. I thought he was generally excellent in both positions, and was just unfortunate enough to have a couple of his poorest performances in a couple of high-expectation, high profile games. He's no long-term Carrick replacement but I have no problem with him playing there.
People's opinions of him have been swung massively by the last few months. At one point didn't he win a poll for our outfield player of the season so far? Every game people would come into the thread to commend him as a 7/10 player every game and say how intelligent he is.
When players of a higher calibre taking steps down from Barcelona/Real Madrid struggled towards the end of the Premier League season (Sanchez, Fabregas, Di Maria, even Costa to some extent) it's crazy how much people have let these last few months influence their ultimate opinion of Blind. He's only recently 25, young for his position, and has come from the Dutch league. Not forgetting that he's had a few injuries, been moved around a ton (all demanding positions too) and was 9th for distance covered at last years World Cup - something we've seen catch up with plenty of other players.
This is a player who the world cup winning German team used as a case study in defending through the knockout stages to the final. For a first season, considering the circumstances, he's been great for us. And as much as people want to doubt him, he's always played when available. Van Gaal clearly has huge trust in him, he's never been left on the bench when even half-fit.
People's opinions only seem to have swung massively because many were so blinded (no pun intended) by the sheer fact we had a semi-competent midfielder playing. It was a sin to criticize him early on. People were being told they weren't intelligent enough to spot his quality.
The same things that some pointed out are now being acknowledged more widely, that's all.
Nobody's said anything too out there, really. He's ideally a squad player (a term which seems to have a negative connotation, but shouldn't) and he'll probably rack up a good 30 games next season, even if he's relegated to squad player. His biggest flaw, in my opinion (flat-footed and slow* without the passing range/speed to compensate) will restrict him from being a starting midfielder in a top European side. Perhaps there will be success, if he's partnered in such a way to reduce the impact of his flaws, but there will always be a number of better alternatives to Blind.
It's a shame, because he's been taught well, he's probably got a better understanding of most roles than most players out there, and he's a secure passer. He'll get games in midfield next season (probably a good number of games), and I don't think anyone is against that. but I don't think he's a long term first choice midfielder here at United.
*For reference, I'd say that while Carrick is seen as slow, he's not flat-footed. He can still move and turn relatively well, whereas Blind is slow and heavy-footed. Plus Carrick's passing range, passing speed, and one-touch play compensates, which isn't the case for Blind, who's even more physically limited.
Maybe, maybe not. So far, he isnt even close and wouldnt start in midfield if it wasnt for injuries. Right now, he's a much better LBA potential Carrick 2.0 when it comes to underestimated players in a few years time.
People's opinions only seem to have swung massively because many were so blinded (no pun intended) by the sheer fact we had a semi-competent midfielder playing. It was a sin to criticize him early on. People were being told they weren't intelligent enough to spot his quality.
The same things that some pointed out are now being acknowledged more widely, that's all.
Nobody's said anything too out there, really. He's ideally a squad player (a term which seems to have a negative connotation, but shouldn't) and he'll probably rack up a good 30 games next season, even if he's relegated to squad player. His biggest flaw, in my opinion (flat-footed and slow* without the passing range/speed to compensate) will restrict him from being a starting midfielder in a top European side. Perhaps there will be success, if he's partnered in such a way to reduce the impact of his flaws, but there will always be a number of better alternatives to Blind.
It's a shame, because he's been taught well, he's probably got a better understanding of most roles than most players out there, and he's a secure passer. He'll get games in midfield next season (probably a good number of games), and I don't think anyone is against that. but I don't think he's a long term first choice midfielder here at United.
*For reference, I'd say that while Carrick is seen as slow, he's not flat-footed. He can still move and turn relatively well, whereas Blind is slow and heavy-footed. Plus Carrick's passing range, passing speed, and one-touch play compensates, which isn't the case for Blind, who's even more physically limited.
His performance levels dropped, but I think that just exposed the weaknesses. Obviously opinions will change along with his performances.Disagree. There's been a noticeable drop off in his performance level as the season progressed. As @ALock1 pointed out, this is something that's happened with a lot of WC players (including our own Wayne Rooney)
I don't see him as similar to Carrick in many ways, to be honest. Carrick never had Blind's biggest weakness, and his passing game was better from day one, from what I remember (though I was young).Funny fact is that a lot of the critics Blind gets have been used for Carrick in the beginning as well. Carrick has massively improved his passing game during the last years.
If we can get someone like Gündogan I might agree to use Blind as a squad player. Otherwise he should be played as DM on a regular basis.
I am not really a fan of him playing as LB.
Yes, I have been saying this for a while so it's nice to see someone else with the same opinion.A potential Carrick 2.0 when it comes to underestimated players in a few years time.
Agree completelyFunny fact is that a lot of the critics Blind gets have been used for Carrick in the beginning as well. Carrick has massively improved his passing game during the last years.
If we can get someone like Gündogan I might agree to use Blind as a squad player. Otherwise he should be played as DM on a regular basis.
I am not really a fan of him playing as LB.
Out of interest, what is Blind's "biggest weakness"? His strength (lack of such)? He can be muscled off the ball, but Carrick isn't exactly the incredible hulk either.I don't see him as similar to Carrick in many ways, to be honest. Carrick never had Blind's biggest weakness, and his passing game was better from day one, from what I remember (though I was young).
I agree that he should be playing if we don't sign someone better. Nobody's suggesting he drops to bottom of the pecking order. He's not a bad player. Being a squad player isn't a bad thing anyway. He'll still play 30 games anyway. But the player you'd put in your best XI in a top tie, with everyone fit?
Funnily enough, Strootman was being compared to Gareth Barry. I'd actually say that Blind is much closer to Gareth Barry, style-wise (the City/Everton version of Barry). And I'd say Blind's peak level will be about Barry's peak level, if I had to predict.
He's very flat-footed as well as slow.Out of interest, what is Blind's "biggest weakness"? His strength (lack of such)? He can be muscled off the ball, but Carrick isn't exactly the incredible hulk either.