Dan
☃
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2009
- Messages
- 14,771
Great stage win by Nibali.
Froome lost about 30 seconds to Quintana today.
Tomorrow will be epic.
Froome lost about 30 seconds to Quintana today.
Tomorrow will be epic.
Great stage win by Nibali.
Froome lost about 30 seconds to Quintana today.
Tomorrow will be epic.
Exactly. I don't think Quintana can take over the Yellow, but he can try and with Nibali breaking out yesterday, the top 3 can shift too.Great race today with the contenders finally committing to some attacks. I think it will be too little too late, but it should now at least be a suspenseful finish with Froome and Sky wobbling a bit today.
Top ride by Quintana but Froome's team delivers for him.
I enjoy the rides. Cant bother about drugs before anything is proved. It will come out sooner or later if they are cheating.the drugs? just like everyone else's domestics. drugs are the longest running tradition at the TdF.
everyone keeps citing the Netherlands stage as the difference. surely Froome would not have restrained himself had the gap been closer
not today certainly, but earlier stages in the race.Froome didn't restrain himseld today.. His teammates had to slow down at times for him to keep up. He seemed empty.. Quintana was one stage away....
The only positive news (for me) is Froome being empty proves he's human, and hopefully all the "cheating" insinuations will stop. I still think what he did on the first mountain stage wasn't human though
I enjoy the rides. Cant bother about drugs before anything is proved. It will come out sooner or later if they are cheating.
If it worries you so much, then you shouldn't probably watch this.
not today certainly, but earlier stages in the race.
yeah, please stop those dopey cheaty piss-taking. turns out Nairo is as much a X-man as Chris, surely??
just to correct, in stage 10, Porte came second and Thomas came fifth or sixth something, Froome definitely had his temmates there. Really no difference between the two afa I'm aware...They probably all are. The problem is Sky constantly saying how clean they are, when they have been repeatedly been caught lying, and being associated with the same people the others are.
Also, there was a big difference between Froome and Quintana today.. Froome was one man destroying the world. Quintana used his whole team and Valverde.
I hope Froome wins it and sticks two fingers up at the scum who've been spitting at him.
I dont really follow cycling that much.
I have to ask why the spitting and accusations of doping about Froome, is there any truth in it?
Has cycling not cleaned its act up after Armstrong ?
Having piss thrown at him and spat at is pretty nasty.
What's with those images?
I dont really follow cycling that much.
I have to ask why the spitting and accusations of doping about Froome, is there any truth in it?
Has cycling not cleaned its act up after Armstrong ?
Having piss thrown at him and spat at is pretty nasty.
just to correct, in stage 10, Porte came second and Thomas came fifth or sixth something, Froome definitely had his temmates there. Really no difference between the two afa I'm aware...
Froome didn't restrain himself today.. His teammates had to slow down at times for him to keep up. He seemed empty.. Quintana was one stage away....
The only positive news (for me) is Froome being empty proves he's human, and hopefully all the "cheating" insinuations will stop. I still think what he did on the first mountain stage wasn't human though
Indeed. It's still very sad that statements like "You can't trust any cyclist." exist in the sport though, but I guess it has always been that way.That's bollocks. The evidence is that it wasn't superhuman. Froome doesn't have anything that sticks on him to suggest he has doped. If it would have been Nibali or Contador nobody would have battered an eye lid.
Unlike many of the other competitors. No, failed tests, rumours, eyewitness', etc. I'm not say he hasn't doped, I guess you can't trust any cyclist. But there's no evidence to suggest he's doped.
That's bollocks. The evidence is that it wasn't superhuman. Froome doesn't have anything that sticks on him to suggest he has doped. If it would have been Nibali or Contador nobody would have battered an eye lid.
Unlike many of the other competitors. No, failed tests, rumours, eyewitness', etc. I'm not say he hasn't doped, I guess you can't trust any cyclist. But there's no evidence to suggest he's doped.
Let's compare his times up some mountains against proven dopers. Do the math.
Yeah, no two races are the same. Even when you take two stages that are exactly the same, weather and such will have an influence on the stage anyways.That's a fallacy. You can't compare one race to another. The elements are different in every race and over the past 5 years the mountain stages in the TdF are less gruelling than before.