Wheato
Full Member
£62million? Makes the Maguire money not seem as bad now
SIXTY TWO MILLION FOR THINGY FROM BRIGHTON. HA HA HA
£62million? Makes the Maguire money not seem as bad now
At the height of the Neymar market. £60m now is fecking absurd for a fullback.That's a steal when we paid 50m for the much scouted AWB.
Sure is but shows how desperate we were to replace Alonso and Emerson. We now have someone who hopefully has 8-10 good years at the top, versatile and could well pay back some of that fee with performances and trophies.At the height of the Neymar market. £60m now is fecking absurd for a fullback.
You’ve pretty much said exactly what we said after signing AWBSure is but shows how desperate we were to replace Alonso and Emerson. We now have someone who hopefully has 8-10 good years at the top, versatile and could well pay back some of that fee with performances and trophies.
I wouldn’t say there was many top tier fullbacks around currently. The ones that are, are not available. So while I have reservations, I’m leaning slightly more towards happier feelings on this deal.
Looks like they got rinsed for this lad. I don't rate Chilwell, but he barely looks like an upgrade, and it was hardly a priority position for Chelsea.
Looks like they got rinsed for this lad. I don't rate Chilwell, but he barely looks like an upgrade, and it was hardly a priority position for Chelsea.
He fecked up on the second yellow for Gallagher but he was generally excellent today. Absolutely full of running and also made multiple huge clearances when we were under pressure.
How many teams have made signings for a good deal this summer? In terms of the big clubs I’m struggling to name a good price because £50 seems to be the new £20. You guys are getting taken to the cleaners for Antony like we are for Fofana.Looks like they got rinsed for this lad. I don't rate Chilwell, but he barely looks like an upgrade, and it was hardly a priority position for Chelsea.
He's obviously not a bad player, but is he much of an upgrade on Chilwell? And, surely this wasn't a priority position for you lot, considering Chilwell is only there a year, and has generally been quite good. I don't particularly rate Chilwell, but from what I've seen, he's been a good signing. Cuceralla, to me, seems more a luxury signing than a necessity.
How many teams have made signings for a good deal this summer? In terms of the big clubs I’m struggling to name a good price because £50 seems to be the new £20. You guys are getting taken to the cleaners for Antony like we are for Fofana.
Think he's most of all meant to be an upgrade on Alonso/Emerson, which he seems to be. An alternative to Chilwell on a similar level is already a massive asset. Lack of high quality cover at LWB/RWB was one of the main factors derailing last season's campaign.Thing about Cucurella is, he really wasn't a priority signing for you lot given Chilwell is decent enough. The fact that he arguably isn't really an upgrade, and the money you spent on him, make the transfer just seem like a luxury signing.
And some brilliant crosses.He fecked up on the second yellow for Gallagher but he was generally excellent today. Absolutely full of running and also made multiple huge clearances when we were under pressure.
Think he's most of all meant to be an upgrade on Alonso/Emerson, which he seems to be. An alternative to Chilwell on a similar level is already a massive asset. Lack of high quality cover at LWB/RWB was one of the main factors derailing last season's campaign.
It's a kind of luxury for sure, but the kind needed for a squad that's built toward challenging the best teams with similar depth. That's why I think he was indeed a priority signing for Chelsea, especially with regards to Chilwell's recovery process. Hence the readiness to overpay.
Not a Chelsea fan, btw. Just saying what I think Tuchel's & Boehly's decisions were based on. If it ultimately pays off, who knows, we'll see.We just signed a leftback to compete with Shaw who is doing really well and staying in the team for 15 million euros
You sign a player for Chilwell and Cucurella fees for them to start on a weekly basis. The Cucurella signing suggests that they're over Chilwell. And he has had injuries. But he's also popped up with a bunch of goals and your team doesnt score a lot... So Cucurella needs to do the same, or vastly outperform Chilwell in general play setting someone else up to make up those goals + more because of the huge fee.
Not a Chelsea fan, btw. Just saying what I think Tuchel's & Boehly's decisions were based on. If it ultimately pays off, who knows, we'll see.
How many teams have made signings for a good deal this summer? In terms of the big clubs I’m struggling to name a good price because £50 seems to be the new £20. You guys are getting taken to the cleaners for Antony like we are for Fofana.
Agreed and the biggest thing is the timing. Spurs, Arsenal and City have all purchased well because the signings were made early in the window. Chelsea have a good excuse to fall back on in this regard with the club being acquired. This is why for me irrespective of who we sign when the window is finished John Murtough should be getting a wave of criticism for his handling of this window. Worst than Woodward at this point.
United have a similar reason for being slow to Chelsea though? I’m not sure you know what’s going on at your own club
This is what I don’t get. A few errors here and there? Yeah. Some of them, by the way, because people could t handle passing as well as Cucurella is used to.Cucurella has 2 assists in 3 starts by the way. He’s been fantastic. Him and Chilwell can coexist and there’s no pressure on Chelsea or Chilwell to rush him back.
Chelsea have seen new ownership overtake much of their planning for the new season due to circumstances outside the influences of football. I don't see how that relates with the transition at United which was merely promotion from John Murtough which was in the pipeline since March 2021. The decisions to rearrange the scouting infrastructure can be criticised. The decisions to axe a manager who was intended to play a consultant role which inadvertently had an effect on United's recruitment can also be criticised. Giving another manager full responsibility over transfers was a key aspect that went against Woodward and is another decision that can be criticised.
No, the contrast between United and Chelsea is not even romotely similar unless the world is black and white with no depth of context.
United sacked Marcel Bout and Jim Lawlor. Both head of global recruitment and chief scout. This was done right at the end of the season and to my knowledge neither have been replaced. We also brought Ten Hag at the start of June and have been gradually putting together a whole new coaching department along side with a make shift recruitment team.
In contrast Chelsea lost both Marina and Cech but have had Tuchel for a while which gives them some consistency.
Id say it’s very similar and infact given the presence of Tuchel, and them being further along in their methods, we’ve had far more change to contend with and that was always going to have an impact on this window.
Except for United shopping in Ajax…PL clubs need to start shopping out of the PL. Not about cucurella specifically but the fees are just bonkers. You'll still get rinsed if you shop outside but it won't be with your pants down
PL clubs need to start shopping out of the PL. Not about cucurella specifically but the fees are just bonkers. You'll still get rinsed if you shop outside but it won't be with your pants down
Those decisions which I reflected on fall on the club / Murtough. They are not random anomalies such as the acquisition of a football club due to war which has caused the government to legislate the sale of a club.
The mere fact that United made those decisions is even more of a conscious choice in association with the hierarchys judgement. United have put themselves into a vulnerable situation which has relfected in the summer window. Chelsea were presented with their own situation outside the remit of any strategic planning and choices.
They made the decisions as they are aware things need to change.
You’re really making zero sense.
I understand where your coming from but your view places no emphasis on the Glazers, Murtoughs and the rest of hierarchys credibility to facilitate those changes which have without doubt negatively impacted this summer window. If Chelsea had a shocking window they are exempt from criticism due to the circumstances surrounding the club. United have rightfully deserved intense scrutiny from the offset. The club have proverbially made their own bed in this regard.
He's obviously not a bad player, but is he much of an upgrade on Chilwell? And, surely this wasn't a priority position for you lot, considering Chilwell is only there a year, and has generally been quite good. I don't particularly rate Chilwell, but from what I've seen, he's been a good signing. Cuceralla, to me, seems more a luxury signing than a necessity.
I’m sorry, I get that we disagree on this and that you are making a point to someone who seems to be making an odd and premature attack on the Murtough transition.Chelsea had a war criminal as an owner. I’m sorry but I’m not sympathetic. I also hate the Glazers and want rid. That doesn’t mean I’m going to ignore the facts though and it was obvious to anyone who knows what’s been going on at United this window was going to be difficult to navigate but hopefully the pay off means we are better prepared for Jan and beyond.