You haven't heard the end of it, it will be the excuse thrown around for another million years I'm sure.Must be because of injury he had million years ago
Gotta get out quick before everyone gets into how Messi was still better than Ronaldo.
You haven't heard the end of it, it will be the excuse thrown around for another million years I'm sure.Must be because of injury he had million years ago
How is it exaggeration?
Who was better than him today for Real?
Stupid exaggeration. He wasn't the best player but was probably the 4th best player for Real today. Played as a team guy.
Also he turned in the Penalty...
Nonsense.
Carvajal
Ramos
Marcelo
Modric
Kroos
James
Benzema
Isco
were all decidedly better. Maybe Pepe was worse but he improved in the 2nd half.
Ah I seeNo, he's saving himself for Copa America.
You haven't heard the end of it, it will be the excuse thrown around for another million years I'm sure.
Gotta get out quick before everyone gets into how Messi was still better than Ronaldo.
At least Ronaldo is better than Messi tonight.
Must be because of injury he had million years ago
Both were a bit pointless. Penalty apart obviously. Ronaldo made strange decisions and poor passes in the final third where there was so much space at times. Messi lacked the spark that he's had in precious classicos.Him and Messi were just useless.
Him and Messi were just useless.
You are obsessed with Messi more than his fanboys.
No, he's saving himself for Copa America.
I would say same about you and few others in case of Ronaldo
See my other post about him where I talk of fine margins and then decide for yourself.
Well I haven't been in this thread for few months talking about Ronaldo, and especially not in Messi's thread talking about Ronaldo like you are doing all the tim, so I have no idea what are you on about.
There have been other Classico's where Ronaldo was better. This was not the only one. That said, Ronaldo was not particularly great tonight. Then again he didn't have to be in order to have been better than Messi or for Madrid to have won.At least Ronaldo is better than Messi tonight.
I have grand total of 8 posts in Messi thread out of 15k+ posts, so I have no idea what are you on about.
Imagine being this strange that you can't even admit when a player, who doesn't even play for your team has a bad game. Lucky for Barca he was shit as well because it could of ended up about 6 if he was his usual self.Business as usual for Cristiano.
If Benzema could finish, he would have at least bagged one assist. His teammates don't finish the chances Ronaldo makes for them. If he did his assists would be up there.
Nevertheless, another goal. Too easy for the monster.
My point was that you are quite often in Ronaldo's thread talking about Messi as quick search confirms it.
My point was that you are quite often in Ronaldo's thread talking about Messi as quick search confirms it.
He´s probably answering to a certain group of people that bring him up all the time here
What can I do? Ronaldo haters like you are more interested in bringing Messi in discussion and proving how he is lot better and then I want to laugh but I post instead.
We should all just enjoy and masturbate to Ronaldo playing and never criticise him again. No one should even post about him if it's not post like this:"Wow, he is great, look how beautiful he is".
Imagine being this strange that you can't even admit when a player, who doesn't even play for your team has a bad game. Lucky for Barca he was shit as well because it could of ended up about 6 if he was his usual self.
Well I think he only has 3 objectives in this match: 1. Win the match 2. Outscored Messi 3. Scored at least a goal. Given his unselfish play throughout I don't think it really matter to him if many of his teammates outshine him. He even celebrated over his teammates goals today.
Disagree. I'm curious to know what that judgement is based on if I may ask? Have you extensively watched full matches or even just highlight/goal footage of that period? Have you read contemporary match reports describing loads of DF errors leading to goals? Have you concluded this based on the opinions of experts, if so which ones? Etc.
On point, 1950s/60s DFs were very obviously a product of their time and space, meaning they were operating within tactical schemes that by today's standards would seem imbalanced to say the least, common formations of that period would have a minimum of 4 or 5 forwards and only 3 defenders (and 2 or 3 additional bodies in MF to shuffle across and try to connect the whole) until the late 50s/early 60s at least (until Brazil "introduced" the 4-2-4 and its derivative 4-3-3). In such a context the high-scoring nature of the average match becomes more reasonably explainable than just a token "DFs were shit" comment borne out of ignorance of said period. It's very clear to note a correlation between the evolution of the average gpg ratio and the evolution of the tactical set-up, formation & mindset throughout the years, which you could reasonably suggest to be causally connected: there is a gradual decline in most leagues' gpg ratio following the shift from a (nominal) 3-man DF to 4-man DF.
Looking at the historically most high-profile professional national league championships,
1950s La Liga: 3.65
1950s First Division: 3.42
1950s Serie A: 2.79
1960s La Liga: 2.76
1960s First Division: 3.16
1960s Serie A: 2.21
1970s La Liga: 2.45
1970s First Division: 2.54
1970s Serie A: 2.06
Did defenders and goalkeepers improve so drastically? Or did forwards turn to shit? Or both? Or is it perhaps more likely that it has (while still a factor) less to do with the specifics of the talent pool in certain positions in this or that decade and much more so with an overarching mentality shift to a more defensively-natured type of football in the mid-1960s (catenaccio anyone?) and 1970s which has largely, though far more evenly balanced from the late 80s/early 90s onwards, lasted up until the late 2000s at least (some exceptions such as the Bundesliga and Eredivisie aside). Cf. the whole debate about the standard of DFs nowadays -- as mentioned I tend to ascribe greater significance to tactics & mentality shifts. As for the whole classic v modern, nostalgia v progress debate, I subscribe to an idea along the lines of a relative "steady state" (with variances here and there), certainly for the post-WWII era, where the advantages and disadvantages mostly cancel each other out so we're left with a clean slate to compare players from different eras based on their actual performances and achievements and not some randomly or selectively concluded valuation of their eras and by extention those players themselves.
well ... he must be a god then
Business as usual for Cristiano.
If Benzema could finish, he would have at least bagged one assist. His teammates don't finish the chances Ronaldo makes for them. If he did his assists would be up there.
Nevertheless, another goal. Too easy for the monster.
7 out of 10 for what exactly?He was decent I though:7/10. But almost everyone else in the Madrid team was an 8/10.
Stats like this taken out of context show why stats alone often dont give a true picture.Agree with most posters that he wasn't particularly good especially compared to most of his team mates, however he was very involved and tried often to create chances for them (mostly through crosses in the 1st half and passes into space in the 2nd half) but he lacked the telling accuracy apart from one instance where Benzema hit the bar. 7/10 seems about right though, a very good collective performance too. I was especially impressed with Dani Carvajal.
If any game has ever epitomized why Cristiano's passing and/or vision aren't considered the stuff of all-time greatness it was this one... he had the opportunity and the will to set his team mates up many times, sometimes in very advantageous situations, but got it wrong too often (and these weren't even particularly difficult instances). Furthermore, his 60% passing accuracy was the lowest of anyone on the pitch. That one chance he created (while it was a pretty good cross) isn't going to change the fact that he squandered significantly more of his team's attacks than his team mates did.
Re: the bold, I can believe that! Especially when the opp. DF is trying his utmost best to concede a pen like Piqué had been doing