Absolutely no one predicted Ronaldo would become as decisive in big moments as he did in his 30s. The argument for Ronaldo back then was that you couldn't possibly expect him to be decisive on such a regular basis - your idea that he
"always had IT but didn't always show it" is pure fantasy. Take this conversation as an example, back when he was a 28 year old "baby":
Or it would go one step further and the argument was all about Ronaldo's movement, his invisible contribution to the attacking line - judging him on decisive goals was just silly, apparently.
It's all
here.
Why be insincere about it? Ronaldo will be defined by that decisiveness, absolutely - even if it only was for a short period of his career. And that decisiveness in that short period is right up there with the best there's been. But you have to stretch that point until it has no credibility, no basis in reality - why?
We know what Ronaldo was like at United - exceptional overall, but not remotely exceptional in big games, or in crunch moments. He absolutely didn't live for them. Up until his last season here, the only remaining criticism of him was his big game performances. He did pretty well on that front in 08/09, but his last ever performance for us underlined the fact it was a long way off being a strength of his, never mind something to define him by. And that continued through the Pellegrini and Mourinho years at Madrid.
It was a relatively sudden turnaround when his reputation went from "flat track bully" to "the player for the big moment". That's something to celebrate now but let's not rewrite history. At least wait a decade to tell it to folks that didn't watch him.