Bebestation
Im a doctor btw, my IQ destroys yours
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2019
- Messages
- 11,862
Yeah, like in the Wolves game, where we conceded 15 shots and were saved by a couple of goal line clearances and then smash & grabbed the win with a flukey Greenwood shot that went under the keeper! And unless you think Henderson would’ve played the majority of games had Ronaldo not re-signed, you’re kind of agreeing with me….
I’m not denying he brought a bunch of issues with him, but the idea that we were so open and got thrashed so readily last season solely because one central striker didn’t press enough (a thing we never did under Ole anyway) just isn’t sensible - to me, at any rate…. And way too convenient.
I mean, if that was the case, why didn’t we play glorious free flowing football every time he was out of the side? When he flew back to Portugal for R&R and whatever? If the muscle memory was there, what was stopping us? Were we all traumatised by the spectre of Ronaldo that we instinctively played as if he was still there? If anything IIRC our stats were slightly worse without him. (Which isn’t to say he improved us btw, just that surely there would’ve been some difference if he was the main cause?)
For me, pressing is the least thing I was frustrated with Ronaldo’s by.
As a striker he has no link up play or hold up play which made our wider players have bad seasons as seen with Sancho’s first season even if he was settling in. No one was good out wide except him through the Centre.
What made us worse is that we became extremely predictable because we would only target Ronaldo with our passes as our main and only threat.
What would then happen with our main passes going to Ronaldo and having no link/hold up play as a striker ?
We would get cought on the counter and players like Lindelof and Maguire and De Gea would get caught out whenever they were playing a high line.
That’s why our defenders were extremely bad last year with no goal difference.
Last edited: