Let’s face it, a big portion of our fanbase are wankers
More than other big clubs you reckon?
Let’s face it, a big portion of our fanbase are wankers
It's so childish and pathetic. Imagine actually tweeting a footballer to give them stick... Weirdos
Dismissing our own fanbase flaws and toxicity is what gets us to this point imo.I would say there is a part of it that is that. But I reckon the larger amount of that will be from non-United fans who simply hate United and all things connected.
I know a lad who supposedly supports Villa, but they only make up around 30% of his football outlook. Another 20% is spent worshipping City and Liverpool while a full 50% is spent actively hating United.
Even after a decade of irrelevance on the field, don't underestimate how much we live on inside the heads of opposition fans.
What is the purpose of this post? Why not attempt to engage in conversation?
40% of all abusive tweets concerning PL footballers in that time period were levelled at Ronaldo, Maguire and Rashford. This in a year where Ronaldo signed for United after coming close to signing for City, and just after a major international tournament where we saw Rashford, Maguire and other lads on the end of shocking abuse from England fans and other elements.
You think it's laughable to suggest not all of those tweets were sent by United fans? Why is it so important to you that we insist all of it is United fans? Do you feel that by acknowledging that United are a club that invoke strong responses from rival fans or that Twitter has a well documented and serious problem with bots and sinister external influencers, we are somehow suggesting that United fans who abuse players are not also wrong and worthy of attention as well?
Not to mention their DMs, it's no surprise they all have people doing their social media for them.
How is the threshold met or managed though?I think you can criticise players without being personal and abusive though?
If people can’t do that then that’s on them really
How is the threshold met or managed though?
During our 5-0 defeat to Liverpool if I described Harry Maguire as a ‘shit cnut’ for his performance. Is that personal ? It’s not directed at him either because it’s on here.
Sometimes language used doesn’t necessarily equate to a person trying to be abusive, that’s how they talk. Doing the job you do I think you can relate. I know I throw around explicit wording with our players when they play like a bunch of toss bags and I’d find it absurd if I was banned or warned for it.
Half of that abuse was directed at just 12 individuals - eight from United.
Certainly the online fans I’d say soMore than other big clubs you reckon?
Got to admire the likes of Ronaldo, Lebron, Mayweather et al ... Imagine if your work was there for everyone one to see - every line of computer code that you're writing or wrote, every financial model you're building or built - and it is being critically assessed and publicly debated by millions of people, most whom are no where as good as you. Imagine if they debate this while you're working, even before your deliverable is finished. And imagine if most of them have a negative opinion of you - maybe you are perceived as arrogant - and that influences their thinking.
Ronaldo is obviously paid well but that still doesn't hide the human element in all of this.
Feel a bigger story here is we have 8 of the top 10 (well 2 have recently left but still)
I swear I've seen this exact set of sentences on Instagram. Are you an influencer, life-coach or motivation guru on the Internet?No different to the muscle it must be destroyed / broken down in order to be rebuilt stronger. Grapes goes through fermentation to create wine this methodology is cultivated within nature and my belief is that these athletes and professionals have learnt to adapt turning the negative into the positive.
I didn't say United fans aren't doing any of the abusing. What I'm implying is that there are a lot more non-United fans in the world than there are United fans.If it's not United fans, how do you explain the abuse on here?
Feel a bigger story here is we have 8 of the top 10 (well 2 have recently left but still)
I swear I've seen this exact set of sentences on Instagram. Are you an influencer, life-coach or motivation guru on the Internet?
Let’s face it, a big portion of our fanbase are wankers
Wouldnt surprise me most of that abuse is from our own United 'fans'.
United have the worst online fanbase..
More than other big clubs you reckon?
What on earth is Fred doing at 6th on that list?
Who doesn't like the Pastor?
How are they defining abuse?
If it's as I suspect such as: "Maguire is terrible" or more likely "Maguire is abslute sh*t", then that is an opinion and not abuse if it isn't taken any further.
From a Reddit post on the study:
- Abusive: The tweet threatens, insults, derogates, dehumanises, mocks or belittles a player. This can be implicit or explicit, and also includes attacks against their identity. We include use of slurs, negative stereotypes and excessive use of profanities.
- Critical: The tweet makes a substantive criticism of a player’s actions, either on their pitch or off. It includes critiquing their skills, their attitude and their values. Often, criticism is less aggressive and emotive.
- Positive: The tweet supports, praises or encourages the player. It includes expressing admiration for a player and their performance, and wishing them well.
- Neutral: The tweet does not fall into the other categories. It does not express a clear stance. neutral statements include unemotive factual statements and descriptions of events.
What differentiates an Abusive insult from a substantive Critical criticism?
Making a definitive statement on a player's character or ability, such as "[Player] is worthless/lazy/arrogant/selfish" is considered an Abusive insult.
Substantive Critical criticisms that convey a similar message could include phrases like "[Player] has been poor today" or "[Player] has appeared to lack effort today." The differentiation from an Abusive insult comes from the lack of a definitive statement about a player's overall character or ability.
Maguire is shit is abuse. Maguire was shit today is not abuse.How are they defining abuse?
If it's as I suspect such as: "Maguire is terrible" or more likely "Maguire is abslute sh*t", then that is an opinion and not abuse if it isn't taken any further.
This place is embarrassing and many can’t act like “fans”. This news is truly embarrassing and a massive issue that will impact the club.
If you're faltering to depression because you've put on a lot more weight than you wanted to carry (hopefully) you aren't going to get your mental boost from a diet plan and a personal trainer.Post of the year
If anyone's in any doubt about this then look at the last few weeks. We've gotten an awful lot of what we were asking for. The club has been restructured & we hired probably the best available manager out there. There are now genuine reasons to believe that the club are getting its act together.
Will our fans be patient and draw the line under what's happened? Of course not. Too many people have (consciously or otherwise) decided that they rather like abusing the club and they don't want to stop doing it.
It's hardly a compliment, even though it's probably only a 2/10 at most on the abusive post scale.So saying a player such as Maguire has no place in the team as he moves slower than a wardrobe and shouldn't be captain of the club would be considered 'belittling' and therefore, abuse?
Jesus Christ.
That's a lame argument, given it's being published on a public forum.How is the threshold met or managed though?
During our 5-0 defeat to Liverpool if I described Harry Maguire as a ‘shit cnut’ for his performance. Is that personal ? It’s not directed at him either because it’s on here.
Sometimes language used doesn’t necessarily equate to a person trying to be abusive, that’s how they talk. Doing the job you do I think you can relate. I know I throw around explicit wording with our players when they play like a bunch of toss bags and I’d find it absurd if I was banned or warned for it.
So saying a player such as Maguire has no place in the team as he moves slower than a wardrobe and shouldn't be captain of the club would be considered 'belittling' and therefore, abuse?
Jesus Christ.
Stop this online abuse of overseas fansIf you are tweeting that at him, its absolutely abuse.
I see it at Chelsea players in replies to the most innocuous thing. " here's a pic of my dog" = "that's nice but get out of my club" (and the MY CLUB comment comes from someone you know has never been to a game).