MexicanCowboy
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2022
- Messages
- 551
- Supports
- Barcelona
Is sad to see Cristiano like this. He should go back to Portugal or go to the MLS and stop the cringe. Maybe in winter.
Is sad to see Cristiano like this. He should go back to Portugal or go to the MLS and stop the cringe. Maybe in winter.
Who is the 1 outfield player?I think one thing that gets overlooked with Ronaldo is not just his advanced age but the sheer amount of games he’s played in his career. He has an insane amount of mileage on his legs that’s almost unparalleled.
A quick look at the list of players with the most appearances in the history of the sport and he’s 8th with 1,165 appearances.
Giggs is 27th with 1044 and he retired in his 40s and wasn’t playing every minute of every game like Ronaldo was throughout his career:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_men's_footballers_with_the_most_official_appearances
The only people ahead of Ronaldo for appearances on this list are goalkeepers and 1 outfield player meaning he’s had the 2nd most appearances EVER in football for someone not in goal meaning that he’s played more games than the likes of Buffon, Xavi, Zanetti, Alves, etc who all also racked up appearances playing at a lower level unlike Ronaldo.
We talk of players like Rooney, Owen, Torres etc being burnt out early because they played a lot as young players. The same applied to Ronaldo so it’s pretty incredible he kept going as on of the best into his early to mid 30s and it’s more or less miraculous he’s held it into his late 30s. And what makes it more unbelievable is that he was always someone that relied on explosive pace which usually leaves by the late 20s.
He did well to adapt like he did but “Father Time” ultimately remains undefeated.
Is sad to see Cristiano like this. He should go back to Portugal or go to the MLS and stop the cringe. Maybe in winter.
Scottish player. Tommy Hutchinson. Played from 1964-1994.Who is the 1 outfield player?
I think one thing that gets overlooked with Ronaldo is not just his advanced age but the sheer amount of games he’s played in his career. He has an insane amount of mileage on his legs that’s almost unparalleled.
A quick look at the list of players with the most appearances in the history of the sport and he’s 8th with 1,165 appearances.
Giggs is 27th with 1044 and he retired in his 40s and wasn’t playing every minute of every game like Ronaldo was throughout his career:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_men's_footballers_with_the_most_official_appearances
The only people ahead of Ronaldo for appearances on this list are goalkeepers and 1 outfield player meaning he’s had the 2nd most appearances EVER in football for someone not in goal.
He’s played more games than the likes of Buffon, Xavi, Zanetti, Alves, etc who all also racked up appearances playing at a lower level unlike Ronaldo.
We talk of players like Rooney, Owen, Torres etc being burnt out early because they played a lot as young players. The same applied to Ronaldo so it’s pretty incredible he kept going as on of the best into his early to mid 30s and it’s more or less miraculous he’s held it into his late 30s. And what makes it more unbelievable is that he was always someone that relied on explosive pace which usually leaves by the late 20s.
He did well to adapt like he did but “Father Time” ultimately remains undefeated.
This is remarkably irrelevant to the fact he skipped pre season. Which is a dreadful idea as an older pro.He's 37. Try as he might he can't go on escaping father time. It will catch up with him and any time now.
Well said, I would usually say he will prove youse wrong but after the other night I’m not so sure, looked a fraction of the player he even was last season never mind at his best. Hope I’m wrong and he continues to defy logic but think this may finally be it.I think one thing that gets overlooked with Ronaldo is not just his advanced age but the sheer amount of games he’s played in his career. He has an insane amount of mileage on his legs that’s almost unparalleled.
A quick look at the list of players with the most appearances in the history of the sport and he’s 8th with 1,165 appearances.
Giggs is 27th with 1044 and he retired in his 40s and wasn’t playing every minute of every game like Ronaldo was throughout his career:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_men's_footballers_with_the_most_official_appearances
The only people ahead of Ronaldo for appearances on this list are goalkeepers and 1 outfield player meaning he’s had the 2nd most appearances EVER in football for someone not in goal.
He’s played more games than the likes of Buffon, Xavi, Zanetti, Alves, etc who all also racked up appearances playing at a lower level unlike Ronaldo.
We talk of players like Rooney, Owen, Torres etc being burnt out early because they played a lot as young players. The same applied to Ronaldo so it’s pretty incredible he kept going as on of the best into his early to mid 30s and it’s more or less miraculous he’s held it into his late 30s. And what makes it more unbelievable is that he was always someone that relied on explosive pace which usually leaves by the late 20s.
He did well to adapt like he did but “Father Time” ultimately remains undefeated.
I think one thing that gets overlooked with Ronaldo is not just his advanced age but the sheer amount of games he’s played in his career. He has an insane amount of mileage on his legs that’s almost unparalleled.
A quick look at the list of players with the most appearances in the history of the sport and he’s 8th with 1,165 appearances.
Giggs is 27th with 1044 and he retired in his 40s and wasn’t playing every minute of every game like Ronaldo was throughout his career:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_men's_footballers_with_the_most_official_appearances
The only people ahead of Ronaldo for appearances on this list are goalkeepers and 1 outfield player meaning he’s had the 2nd most appearances EVER in football for someone not in goal.
He’s played more games than the likes of Buffon, Xavi, Zanetti, Alves, etc who all also racked up appearances playing at a lower level unlike Ronaldo.
We talk of players like Rooney, Owen, Torres etc being burnt out early because they played a lot as young players. The same applied to Ronaldo so it’s pretty incredible he kept going as on of the best into his early to mid 30s and it’s more or less miraculous he’s held it into his late 30s. And what makes it more unbelievable is that he was always someone that relied on explosive pace which usually leaves by the late 20s.
He did well to adapt like he did but “Father Time” ultimately remains undefeated.
Et Tu, Mister?! From his biggest fan and now a huge doubter.
Chance compilation was posted so we don't even need the usual subjective back and forth to describe why this is the definition of a gash performance.Am i the only one who thinks he wasn't that bad ? All our decent chance came from him , and I don't think Rashford would have done any better. Some people underestimating sociedad as if they weren't better team than the likes of leicester and Southampton who we struggled to beat with Rashford as 9. We have abysmal record against spanish side no matter what rank they are in La Liga , we never beat them comfortably.
1st chance Rashford wouldn't be able to finish it either since he couldn't shot with his leftChance compilation was posted so we don't even need the usual subjective back and forth to describe why this is the definition of a gash performance.
Even that offside goal, why the hell? 8 players were in box when the original chance got cleared. He shouldn't even have been offside to begin with, talk less of spending an eternity strolling back.
Shilton & perhaps Bastock are a long shot but he’s getting to 3rd on that list easy, which is insane really.I think one thing that gets overlooked with Ronaldo is not just his advanced age but the sheer amount of games he’s played in his career. He has an insane amount of mileage on his legs that’s almost unparalleled.
A quick look at the list of players with the most appearances in the history of the sport and he’s 8th with 1,165 appearances.
Giggs is 27th with 1044 and he retired in his 40s and wasn’t playing every minute of every game like Ronaldo was throughout his career:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_men's_footballers_with_the_most_official_appearances
The only people ahead of Ronaldo for appearances on this list are goalkeepers and 1 outfield player meaning he’s had the 2nd most appearances EVER in football for someone not in goal.
He’s played more games than the likes of Buffon, Xavi, Zanetti, Alves, etc who all also racked up appearances playing at a lower level unlike Ronaldo.
We talk of players like Rooney, Owen, Torres etc being burnt out early because they played a lot as young players. The same applied to Ronaldo so it’s pretty incredible he kept going as on of the best into his early to mid 30s and it’s more or less miraculous he’s held it into his late 30s. And what makes it more unbelievable is that he was always someone that relied on explosive pace which usually leaves by the late 20s.
He did well to adapt like he did but “Father Time” ultimately remains undefeated.
1st chance Rashford wouldn't be able to finish it either since he couldn't shot with his left
2nd and 3th , he was even worse at heading
4th Rashford first touch isn't better than his left foot , so that kind of chance would have failed as well
5th , see 2nd and 3th
6th Don't see anything wrong with this , Sociedad defender read the attack well and quick to cover
in the end Rashford isn't the solution for us especially if we faced against a team who didn't put a high line defense .Although the quality of the chance created by us isn't as good as , let's say city , see how Haaland literally scoring tap in week in week out, he just have to be big and strong to outmuscled defender . We need Ronaldo back to at least half his best or buy another striker who can create for himself. And don't mention Martial can be our solution, guy hasn't score a single league goal for the last 365 days.
I don't know why you think you can hide a Ronaldo performance discussion behind Rashford and Martial. One has an assist in only 45 minutes of play and the other is on 5 goals for the season. Literally everyone has better chemistry without. The notion that current Ronaldo is automatically better is pure arrogance and comes from name value. Since he joined I'm not sure we've even put together a decent stretch of results with Ronaldo starting. The drop off in team functionality is crazy. Even the highlights show a problematic pattern, an excessive amount of in-field crosses and direct balls being forced into the middle. Highly predictable pattern most teams have no problem snuffing out.1st chance Rashford wouldn't be able to finish it either since he couldn't shot with his left
2nd and 3th , he was even worse at heading
4th Rashford first touch isn't better than his left foot , so that kind of chance would have failed as well
5th , see 2nd and 3th
6th Don't see anything wrong with this , Sociedad defender read the attack well and quick to cover
in the end Rashford isn't the solution for us especially if we faced against a team who didn't put a high line defense .Although the quality of the chance created by us isn't as good as , let's say city , see how Haaland literally scoring tap in week in week out, he just have to be big and strong to outmuscled defender . We need Ronaldo back to at least half his best or buy another striker who can create for himself. And don't mention Martial can be our solution, guy hasn't score a single league goal for the last 365 days.
Apart from when we beat this exact team 4-0 just last year you mean?Am i the only one who thinks he wasn't that bad ? All our decent chance came from him , and I don't think Rashford would have done any better. Some people underestimating sociedad as if they weren't better team than the likes of leicester and Southampton who we struggled to beat with Rashford as 9. We have abysmal record against spanish side no matter what rank they are in La Liga , we never beat them comfortably.
I think one thing that gets overlooked with Ronaldo is not just his advanced age but the sheer amount of games he’s played in his career. He has an insane amount of mileage on his legs that’s almost unparalleled.
A quick look at the list of players with the most appearances in the history of the sport and he’s 8th with 1,165 appearances.
Giggs is 27th with 1044 and he retired in his 40s and wasn’t playing every minute of every game like Ronaldo was throughout his career:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_men's_footballers_with_the_most_official_appearances
The only people ahead of Ronaldo for appearances on this list are goalkeepers and 1 outfield player meaning he’s had the 2nd most appearances EVER in football for someone not in goal.
He’s played more games than the likes of Buffon, Xavi, Zanetti, Alves, etc who all also racked up appearances playing at a lower level unlike Ronaldo.
We talk of players like Rooney, Owen, Torres etc being burnt out early because they played a lot as young players. The same applied to Ronaldo so it’s pretty incredible he kept going as on of the best into his early to mid 30s and it’s more or less miraculous he’s held it into his late 30s. And what makes it more unbelievable is that he was always someone that relied on explosive pace which usually leaves by the late 20s.
He did well to adapt like he did but “Father Time” ultimately remains undefeated.
No, there are a handful of others who are just as delusional and who also have their head firmly planted inside his anusAm i the only one who thinks he wasn't that bad ? All our decent chance came from him , and I don't think Rashford would have done any better. Some people underestimating sociedad as if they weren't better team than the likes of leicester and Southampton who we struggled to beat with Rashford as 9. We have abysmal record against spanish side no matter what rank they are in La Liga , we never beat them comfortably.
Brilliant, what a constructive and non inflammatory post. Well done.No, there are a handful of others who are just as delusional and who also have their head firmly planted inside his anus
What’s his fans got anything to do with it?I don't think anything is overlooked. If Ronaldo and his fans accept that he doesn't have to started every game there won't be any big issues. Actually we have to take it one step forward, if Ronaldo and his fans accept that he should be bench player and come on as impact sub then most of the issues would be resolved. But then he is on insane wages to play that role.
What’s his fans got anything to do with it?
I think most people agree he hasn’t been good.On the pitch argument - Ronaldo
Off the pitch argument - his fans.
There’s extremes on both sides. Either he’s terrible or world class. Surely the answer is somewhere in the middle.The bottom line is that at this point there are tonnes of strikers just in the Premier League who can offer more to a side than Ronaldo does. In fact, I can quite honestly say I struggle to think of a starter in a Premier League side who is less effective up front than Ronaldo.
He's just too old.There’s extremes on both sides. Either he’s terrible or world class. Surely the answer is somewhere in the middle.
It's patent that Ronaldo's outstanding striker instincts are still there. I've never seen someone better at making runs off of the last defender and anticipating passes and crosses, and he still has that. The issue is he no longer has the explosive burst of pace so unless he timed his runs absolutely to perfection, he'll either be offside or the defender will catch him.
Those players will have been used to not having that kind of explosive pace though, so they will have tailored their movement to account for it. It's seriously difficult for a player like Ronaldo to adapt when that goes because even into his thirties he's always been a physical freak. Your instincts are still telling you to make those runs but your body just cannot keep up any more. A similar thing is happening with Vardy.If his striker instincts were still outstanding, better than anyone else at making those runs, then he wouldn’t be offside or caught by the defender. Loads of strikers scored bucketloads of goals without the kind of explosive pace Ronaldo had, many were even fairly slow, but those instincts got them the goals anyway.
Very good point.I think one thing that gets overlooked with Ronaldo is not just his advanced age but the sheer amount of games he’s played in his career. He has an insane amount of mileage on his legs that’s almost unparalleled.
A quick look at the list of players with the most appearances in the history of the sport and he’s 8th with 1,165 appearances.
Giggs is 27th with 1044 and he retired in his 40s and wasn’t playing every minute of every game like Ronaldo was throughout his career:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_men's_footballers_with_the_most_official_appearances
The only people ahead of Ronaldo for appearances on this list are goalkeepers and 1 outfield player meaning he’s had the 2nd most appearances EVER in football for someone not in goal.
He’s played more games than the likes of Buffon, Xavi, Zanetti, Alves, etc who all also racked up appearances playing at a lower level unlike Ronaldo.
We talk of players like Rooney, Owen, Torres etc being burnt out early because they played a lot as young players. The same applied to Ronaldo so it’s pretty incredible he kept going as on of the best into his early to mid 30s and it’s more or less miraculous he’s held it into his late 30s. And what makes it more unbelievable is that he was always someone that relied on explosive pace which usually leaves by the late 20s.
He did well to adapt like he did but “Father Time” ultimately remains undefeated.
That's what i was thinking. Remember the matchdayvposts of his feet won't do what his brain wants to anymore and stuff and then he started scoring regularly. Twat for missing pre season though.I mean he did have plenty of games where he played similarly last season so last night shouldn't be a huge shock to anyone. Sure he can still contribute this season.
Chance compilation was posted so we don't even need the usual subjective back and forth to describe why this is the definition of a gash performance.
Even that offside goal, why the hell? 8 players were in box when the original chance got cleared. He shouldn't even have been offside to begin with, talk less of spending an eternity strolling back.