The Man Himself
asked for a tagline change and all I got was this.
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2013
- Messages
- 22,406
It is really incredible to see that someone could make 264 in a 50 over game.
I don't understand why people are undermining what he did simply because he did it in India and is used to the conditions. If it was that simple, it would have been happening much more regularly.
The 5 highest runs in test cricket (Lara, Hayden, Lara, Jayawardene & Sobers) have all come in their own backyards. Does it mean that we should just undermine them?
It is incredible, yes.
No, even in Indian condition, we won't be seeing 200 made so easily, let alone 264.
The problem or difference with all those whom you have named (including Mahela) is that everyone knew they were great players who achieved that feat at some stage whereas with Rohit, you know that more disappointment will be in store for Indian fans.
It is not fair to play down his achievement, even with how shite SL were and how many catches they dropped but because it is Rohit Sharma, you know that this won't mean that he will suddenly become more consistent or deliver for us overseas.