TwoSheds
More sheds (and tiles) than you, probably
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2014
- Messages
- 13,884
KKJ with another fine knock for Lancs!
KKJ with another fine knock for Lancs!
Ball can’t leave the field, I assume?
So that was a legitimate catch? Regardless, it was a hell of an athletic move.Not 100% but I think it can, just can’t touch the floor and the catch has to be made inside the boundary
Ball can’t leave the field, I assume?
This could very well be the only rule of cricket I now understand!Yeah that was last year and a legitimate catch. The ball/the fielder cannot be touching the boundary rope or floor outside the boundary.
Oh don’t worry about that, it’s cricket it’ll always find a way to be convoluted, like when this happenedThis could very well be the only rule of cricket I now understand!
Not one for the "IPL is killing cricket" bandwagon usually, but it's sure starting to look like that right now
MI Cape Town, MI Emirates? Really..
Not one for the "IPL is killing cricket" bandwagon usually, but it's sure starting to look like that right now
MI Cape Town, MI Emirates? Really..
Test cricket is already on the decline & that will likely continue over the next decade. I think the big-3 will be ok, but I reckon all the other nations will struggle to compete financially against franchise cricket & we’ll see that dominate the calendar.
This cannot be denied but I have never understood why. It’s the best format by a distance. To squander something like that takes some doing.
I have been keeping half an eye on this and wanted to post something in here once I had properly read through the various things that I have noticed but I’ll just share my basic observations so far.
The absence of Dewald Brevis in the South Africa squad for the T20s in England was interesting. Absolutely a player you think South Africa would look at ahead of the T20 World Cup. Turns out he was in England in July, playing for a Mumbai development squad. He’s conveniently been picked up since by MI Cape Town as an uncapped player. Is he the first young player whose career will essentially be dictated by a franchise?
The UAE T20 league which allows up to 9 overseas players and is expected to run parallel to the Big Bash has been causing some tension. It’s been suggested David Warner and Cricket Australia had to negotiate a deal to keep him in the Big Bash. Trent Boult has also terminated his central contract with New Zealand and signed up to this league.
It’s been suggested FTP schedule allows a 2 and half month window for the IPL. If I was to sketch out a calendar for player playing nothing but T20/franchise cricket:
Aug - Sept - CPL
Nov - Dec - Abu Dhabi T10
Dec - Feb - LPL, BBL, UAE ILT20/CSA T20, BPL
Feb - March - PSL
Apr-June - IPL
May - July - T20 Blast
August - the Hundred
That’s a pretty ridiculous schedule. Looking at someone like Will Smeed, a product of the first-class system who hasn’t played a single first-class game but has already played in the Hundred, the PSL and has been selected for the UAE ILT20, it’s extremely foolish to view the franchise circuit as an arena for specialists only however. It’s fast-tracking and directing the careers of young talent too now.
Looking at the calendar and the overlap of so many leagues with an increasing number of common owners it’s not hard to envision wall-to-wall franchise cricket with franchise brands bound together across the globe and players contracted specifically to those franchises. 50-over cricket will surely die and I imagine test cricket will eventually be exclusive to the boards who can afford to run it (imagine how sad it will be to see the West Indies not play test cricket). The game should be focused on sustainability, playing top cricket with healthy players in a way everyone can access whether it be on TV or going to a ground and spreading money fairly to ensure the long term development of the game across the world. Instead the game will be driven by greed.
The Hundred is a bit shit isn't it?
Like, I'm relatively over all of the things that annoyed me about it when it started, but having watched a bit more of it it's just a bit of a crap product with utterly forgettable teams, pretty poor quality cricket and lairy, annoying visuals.
It feels exactly as soulless as you'd expect for a tournament designed by a marketing consultancy firm.
Nice to have you back .
Watched the first game this year which was the first time I had watched it and thought it was the Blast without an atmosphere. With Stokes dropping out 2 years in a row, Bairstow dropping out this year I don’t think this will be around for long to be honest.
50-over cricket will surely die
Nice to have you back .
Watched the first game this year which was the first time I had watched it and thought it was the Blast without an atmosphere. With Stokes dropping out 2 years in a row and Bairstow dropping out this year I don’t think this will be around for long to be honest.
If that happens we’ll probably see MI Southern Brave sooner than expected. The benefit the Hundred has over BBL is the lack of competition during the same period.I can see big name players skipping next year in favour of resting for the more lucrative T20 leagues and then it's pretty much curtains.
Not sure about that, it’s committed with Sky until 2028 and with the growth of franchise cricket elsewhere, the ECB will need to have something similar to offer as well. The big question mark is whether or not they go down the privatisation route as SA have done.
As both Stokes and Bairstow are both on central contracts with big Test commitments, they weren’t really getting anything extra from the Hundred this year so can’t blame them for dropping out.
The Hundred is a bit shit isn't it?
Like, I'm relatively over all of the things that annoyed me about it when it started, but having watched a bit more of it it's just a bit of a crap product with utterly forgettable teams, pretty poor quality cricket and lairy, annoying visuals.
It feels exactly as soulless as you'd expect for a tournament designed by a marketing consultancy firm.
The exact problem with franchise cricket is every board wanting their own piece of the pie. It’s not sustainable. I’m sure the ECB will ride out the Hundred as long as possible but I don’t think it has much star power beyond the Blast already and it’s only going to get worse as players become more selective with which franchise coin they want to get.
It’s a bad look for a tournament if top home based players are dropping out basically because the schedule is so daft. Next year they’re shifting the Ashes to provide a window for this and it won’t surprise me if after 5 tests, players drop out again next year.
If that happens we’ll probably see MI Southern Brave sooner than expected. The benefit the Hundred has over BBL is the lack of competition during the same period.
That could be a double edged sword though. It's the English summer that is incongruous with the international schedule, and if you wanna build on an off season for players constantly on the go it'd be this time which could become vulnerable.
Long term there could be issues although the state of cricket could be vastly different in the long term. Regardless I don’t see it being dropped after next year.
WowwSA are 9/5 against India in a T20 game.
No love for the Asia cup, even though the Ind-Pak game was cracking.
Anyway, almost 25 years since Bangladesh debuted in cricket and they're still just so bad. I don't get it. They have the passion, they have the stadiums. Heck, they even have quality players. How do they still have the mentality of minnows?
Temba Bavuma has got to be one of the worst T20 players I have ever seen. Not only does he not score runs, he takes his time not scoring runs. In this latest T20 series against India he managed a grand total of 3 runs in 3 matches opening the batting. Worse, it took him 19 balls to get those 3 runs. SA are a pretty good T20 team, but if they want a shot at winning this coming World Cup, Bavuma has got to go.
Is the main problem if Bavuma isn’t there then who captains? His form is terrible (if it even counts as form in T20), but there’s a real lack of leadership in that squadTemba Bavuma has got to be one of the worst T20 players I have ever seen. Not only does he not score runs, he takes his time not scoring runs. In this latest T20 series against India he managed a grand total of 3 runs in 3 matches opening the batting. Worse, it took him 19 balls to get those 3 runs. SA are a pretty good T20 team, but if they want a shot at winning this coming World Cup, Bavuma has got to go.
I'd have David Miller as captain and move Bavuma down the order to 12.Is the main problem if Bavuma isn’t there then who captains? His form is terrible (if it even counts as form in T20), but there’s a real lack of leadership in that squad
It’s whether they move him down the order