Heard there was covid exposure. Sad as the tournament was going good.PSL postponed? Wtf happened @ha_rooney ?
Heard there was covid exposure. Sad as the tournament was going good.PSL postponed? Wtf happened @ha_rooney ?
Heard there was covid exposure. Sad as the tournament was going good.
PSL postponed? Wtf happened @ha_rooney ?
First a hattrick
And then this
Read that 6 players within the bubble got CovidPSL postponed? Wtf happened @ha_rooney ?
What's going on with the Windies? Didn't think the guys were considered for selection anymore.
Dwayne Bravo
Fidel Edwards
Chris Gayle
Lendl Simmons
Gayle is the one which is surprising me the most to be honest. He is like 40 years old flying around the globe playing in all these franchise conditions with a dodgy heart, I thought he would of slowed down by now. Great longevity to be fair in regards to Edwards as he did ok with Hampshire couple of seasons ago when he was with them. Just checked on Wikipedia he's 39.Fidel Edwards has been bowling well in some of the leagues so is a good addition, Gayle is definitely still an asset to have . Simmons is the one I am unsure about
Jadeja.Just watching the Sri Lanka vs West Indies match and really impressed again by the bowling of Lasith Embuldeiya. I thought he had a great series against England.
There seems to be a great selection in left arm off spinners in cricket at the minute.
Leach
Embuldeiya
Axar
Maharaj
Is that all or have I missed anyone out?
Brilliant by Zaman but De Kock completely outsmarted him there
41.5 Deliberate distraction, deception or obstruction of batsman
41.5.1In addition to 41.4, it is unfair for any fielder wilfully to attempt, by word or action, to distract, deceive or obstruct either batsman after the striker has received the ball.
41.5.2 It is for either one of the umpires to decide whether any distraction, deception or obstruction is wilful or not.
41.5.3 If either umpire considers that a fielder has caused or attempted to cause such a distraction, deception or obstruction, he/she shall immediately call and signal Dead ball and inform the other umpire of the reason for the call.
41.5.4 Neither batsman shall be dismissed from that delivery.
41.5.5 If an obstruction involves physical contact, the umpires together shall decide whether or not an offence under Law 42 (Players’ conduct) has been committed.
41.5.5.1 If an offence under Law 42 (Players’ conduct) has been committed, they shall apply the relevant procedures in Law 42 and shall also apply each of 41.5.7 to 41.5.9.
41.5.5.2 If they consider that there has been no offence under Law 42 (Players’ conduct), they shall apply each of 41.5.6 to 41.5.10.
41.5.6 The bowler’s end umpire shall
- award 5 Penalty runs to the batting side.
- inform the captain of the fielding side of the reason for this action and as soon as practicable inform the captain of the batting side.
41.5.7 The ball shall not count as one of the over.
41.5.8 Any runs completed by the batsmen before the offence shall be scored, together with any runs for penalties awarded to either side. Additionally, the run in progress shall be scored whether or not the batsmen had already crossed at the instant of the offence.
41.5.9 The batsmen at the wicket shall decide which of them is to face the next delivery.
41.5.10 The umpires together shall report the occurrence as soon as possible after the match to the Executive of the offending side and to any Governing Body responsible for the match, who shall take such action as is considered appropriate against the captain, any other individuals concerned and, if appropriate, the team.
Outsmarted? There's nothing 'outsmarted' about breaking the laws. Shouldn't have been given out and 5 penalty runs should have been awarded to the batting side.
Had no idea there was a law against pointing to one end while the ball was actually headed to the other end.Outsmarted? There's nothing 'outsmarted' about breaking the laws. Shouldn't have been given out and 5 penalty runs should have been awarded to the batting side.
Had no idea there was a law against pointing to one end while the ball was actually headed to the other end.
Going by what you posted I guess De Kock cheated by the letter of the law but on a practical level it was quite hillarious that something as simple as pointing to the bowling end completely fooled Zaman
Yea. Umpires had a cockup today, they missed the ball hitting Bavuma's hat as well, which would've been 5 penalty runs as well. I guess the third umpire cannot intervene on these things even if it's obvious from replays.
10 less runs in that chase with the form Fakhar was in? Could've made a difference.
I get your point and that is what I said that I understand it was a wrong by the letter of the law.The issue wasn't just the pointing, but Fakhar clearly slowed down and even looked back at the bowlers end thinking the throw was going there. Clear violation of the law missed by the umpires, I guess Fakhar didn't complain as well so no one looked into it.
Now this makes sense as the correct definition of deception.Hard to call it a deception when the ball is clearly in play and can be seen by everybody. I think deception would be where a fielder tries to hide the fact that he has the ball and then throws it when the batsmen start running
Hard to call it a deception when the ball is clearly in play and can be seen by everybody. I think deception would be where a fielder tries to hide the fact that he has the ball and then throws it when the batsmen start running
She's a nasty piece of work, and always has been.What a disgusting tweet from Taslima Nasreen about Moeen Ali
What's the little narcissist said?She's a nasty piece of work, and always has been.