Chesterlestreet
Man of the crowd
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2012
- Messages
- 19,791
I strongly disagree with this statement. I hold up my own national team as a great example of this - we are at best a below average ability international side but at home with the incredible atmosphere we generate as fans we are also one of the toughest sides to beat at home in Europe. A huge part of that is down to the connection the players have to the fans and they raise their game. If you lose that connection and atmosphere then we are nowhere near the same team.
Statistical evidence very much supports what you suggest here. Playing at home is - statistically - a significant advantage.
Not least for national teams, one could add.
That said, how much a particular crowd of supporters will actually influence the performance of their own team is a matter of pure conjecture, really: in other words, it seems far-fetched to claim that playing behind closed doors would negatively impact Team X more than Team Y.
Every set of fans think they're the greatest around, that's a given.
The - and again, it's absolutely a real thing - home advantage is most likely down to the mentality of the visitors: a draw is usually considered a decent result away from home, and you play accordingly.
I don't know if anyone has done a study on it, but it would be very interesting to see the stats pertaining to the following scenario(s): the visitors have to win (to win the title, or to stay in the race, or to escape relegation, or to progress in a knock-out competition, etc.). I suspect those numbers will be somewhat different.