Sandikan
aka sex on the beach
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2011
- Messages
- 55,099
Except there won't be any relegation & promotion if the season gets voided. How would the structure look then ?
The same as now.
Rather then adding teams to The top flight
Except there won't be any relegation & promotion if the season gets voided. How would the structure look then ?
Sorry could only respond after midnight as only allowed 3 posts a day.So you don't think null and void treats every team equally? You're talking about the affect again after the event. That's irrelevant.
I never said he wasn't, I'm just saying he likely wouldn't be saying it if he was in Wilder's position.He’s actually right.
it relies on testing, and having support of medical staff. How can you do that if the tests are required by the NHS.
Furthermore, the questions of squad depth and costs of players wages has been raised by the article - which I have been banging on about for weeks, not for the PL but for the lower leagues.
it’s a shame if didn’t fit your agenda (for you), but to marginalise the issues and challenges would be utter nonsense
I never said he wasn't, I'm just saying he likely wouldn't be saying it if he was in Wilder's position.
Sorry could only respond after midnight as only allowed 3 posts a day.
Let’s just complete the season (whenever that is I say). We can all manage what that means for 2020/21 and beyond. That for me will be the fairness option no matter how difficult that might be. Hell we planned to move a WC to winter after all.
Because once it means that next season can’t be played safely it becomes a matter of whether finishing this year is financially more viable than completing next year.Sorry could only respond after midnight as only allowed 3 posts a day.
Let’s just complete the season (whenever that is I say). We can all manage what that means for 2020/21 and beyond. That for me will be the fairness option no matter how difficult that might be. Hell we planned to move a WC to winter after all.
He’s actually right.
it relies on testing, and having support of medical staff. How can you do that if the tests are required by the NHS.
Furthermore, the questions of squad depth and costs of players wages has been raised by the article - which I have been banging on about for weeks, not for the PL but for the lower leagues.
it’s a shame if didn’t fit your agenda (for you), but to marginalise the issues and challenges would be utter nonsense
They cant allow 50 percent capacity at football matches then not expect people to flock to the pubs or something similar.I mean they could make an exception with extreme testing but I think the social distancing that will be in place after the lockdown will ban crowds of 20+ or something really low, you would wonder how matches of 30-70k people can start up again. Maybe they will only allow 50% capacity with spaces between spectators. Honestly wouldn’t surprise me that. They will do everything to bring football back once the lockdown ends.
Sorry could only respond after midnight as only allowed 3 posts a day.
Let’s just complete the season (whenever that is I say). We can all manage what that means for 2020/21 and beyond. That for me will be the fairness option no matter how difficult that might be. Hell we planned to move a WC to winter after all.
the issue is simpler than that. You can’t put people in grounds due to access issues, fire and safety risks, etcThey cant allow 50 percent capacity at football matches then not expect people to flock to the pubs or something similar.
You cant begin making exceptions like that then expect people to follow it in other situations.
They wont do it
Surprise surprise a manager who will benefit from a void has come out with that.
I'm sure Moyes means well but would he be saying the same if he was in Wilder's shoes? To put it diplomatically, I have my doubts.
When a new season commences we all start on equal footing with zero points. What happens after that is that every club, team, & player, is fundamentally in some sort of control of their respective club's destiny for that season. So the bolded bit isn't really true is it ? You have some teams who do really well, some just OK, & some very poorly. Therefore, by voiding the season you're effectively saying it never existed, so those who didn't make the full use of the control they had get another free hit, whilst the likes of Leeds & West Brom who have battled their way into a great position for automatic promotion get penalized & have to start all over again next season in The Championship. I'm pretty sure this narrative of treating all clubs the same would die a very quick death in the courtroom.
I know that.T
the issue is simpler than that. You can’t put people in grounds due to access issues, fire and safety risks, etc
That is possible in fantasy movies, not in the current situation. You post is so far from reality that I won’t even make the effort of explaining why.I mean they could make an exception with extreme testing but I think the social distancing that will be in place after the lockdown will ban crowds of 20+ or something really low, you would wonder how matches of 30-70k people can start up again. Maybe they will only allow 50% capacity with spaces between spectators. Honestly wouldn’t surprise me that. They will do everything to bring football back once the lockdown ends.
As I see it, we are currently hovering along the middle of a straight line that has two extreme ends: the fairest conclusion and the most profitable conclusion. The fairest conclusion is continuing this season till it concludes, however long it takes - July, October, November or whenever - with total disregard of the new season, and accepting that season 20/21 will be curtailed. The most profitable conclusion is terminating this season as soon as possible and start preparing for the next, so that the more profitable season (20/21 vs 19/20) is least affected. Unfortunately with this virus that refuses to relent, we have “almost” reached the stage where there is no middle-ground, and the European Leagues will have to choose one of the two extreme options. .Let’s just complete the season (whenever that is I say). We can all manage what that means for 2020/21 and beyond. That for me will be the fairness option no matter how difficult that might be.
The idea of 50% capacity is fantasy but my point is they will do anything to continue the season once the lockdown ends even with social distancing. The idea that the Premier League will consider cancelling anything as sensible economics is ridiculous. I’m saying it wouldn’t surprise me if they suggested something mad like 2m between every spectator and testing of every player/TV crew person before every game.That is possible in fantasy movies, not in the current situation. You post is so far from reality that I won’t even make the effort of explaining why.
As I see it, we are currently hovering along the middle of a straight line that has two extreme ends: the fairest conclusion and the most profitable conclusion. The fairest conclusion is continuing this season till it concludes, however long it takes - July, October, November or whenever - with total disregard of the new season, and accepting that season 20/21 will be curtailed. The most profitable conclusion is terminating this season as soon as possible and start preparing for the next, so that the more profitable season (20/21 vs 19/20) is least affected. Unfortunately with this virus that refuses to relent, we have “almost” reached the stage where there is no middle-ground, and the European Leagues will have to choose one of the two extreme options. .
There is no “fairness” in wars. Please drop the notion that this multi-billion pound entertainment industry will prioritise fairness over sensible economics.
It’s really not hard to understand this, spacing people out by 2m in the stands is fine but how do you expect them to get there?The idea of 50% capacity is fantasy but my point is they will do anything to continue the season once the lockdown ends even with social distancing. The idea that the Premier League will consider cancelling anything as sensible economics is ridiculous. I’m saying it wouldn’t surprise me if they suggested something mad like 2m between every spectator and testing of every player/TV crew person before every game.
Even if Liverpool do get the title given to them no one will care. There will be no parade, very little coverage of it and frankly it’s just completely irrelevant right now.
It will surely feel very hollow to the players.
Surprise surprise a manager who will benefit from a void has come out with that.
I'm sure Moyes means well but would he be saying the same if he was in Wilder's shoes? To put it diplomatically, I have my doubts.
It's not far fetched at all, do you expect them to go from no fans to 70k fans at Old Trafford once it's safe to have attendance again? No, it will happen gradually so 50% capacity allowed is something that will happen in the future. Just like having schools at half capacity will happen, having workfloors at half capacity, you name it. It will all happen in different phases. There is a gigantic difference half full or completely full, can't even begin to describe how foolish it is to think otherwise.It’s really not hard to understand this, spacing people out by 2m in the stands is fine but how do you expect them to get there?
Everybody will be passing through ingress/egress points, things like handrails on stairs, turnstiles etc. COVID19 sits on those surfaces waiting to find a new host.
What happens if the stadium needs to be evacuated? How do you think the 2m spacing will go then when everyone is trying to get out in a hurry?
If you’re going to let spectators in, then there’s not really a lot of difference between having the stadium half full or completely full because of the above.
EDIT: not directed at you, just infuriates me the number of people that are talking about letting crowds in.
Even if Liverpool do get the title given to them no one will care. There will be no parade, very little coverage of it and frankly it’s just completely irrelevant right now.
It will surely feel very hollow to the players.
The most glorious silver lining of this situation.It's certainly the least satisfactory way ever to win it.
If they weren't generally such a hateful lot you'd almost feel sorry for them
I guess its 50/50 everyone will treat it as "that year", which is probably very unfair, but they will maybe still get a title. The Liverpool media mafia will go nuts, and remember they managed to get entered into the CL that year by the FA. So I am sure teh FA will be desperate to give it to them. Null and void would be genuinely the "fairest" solution. I don't think the FA have the balls for it.
Simply wear gloves, for example. It's already happening in supermarkets and other places which are being kept open during the lockdown. And no, the social distancing can't always be kept in place in emergency situations, but that's the same for literally every place.
It's not far fetched at all, do you expect them to go from no fans to 70k fans at Old Trafford once it's safe to have attendance again? No, it will happen gradually so 50% capacity allowed is something that will happen in the future. Just like having schools at half capacity will happen, having workfloors at half capacity, you name it. It will all happen in different phases. There is a gigantic difference half full or completely full, can't even begin to describe how foolish it is to think otherwise.
Also I could reach my seat at Anfield without touching anything with my hands, let alone all the things you mentioned. People adapt to situations, and will be more careful and vigilant in stadiums. Simply wear gloves, for example. It's already happening in supermarkets and other places which are being kept open during the lockdown. And no, the social distancing can't always be kept in place in emergency situations, but that's the same for literally every place.
If you follow your "oh you can't do that because X or Y might happen" reasoning than it's just better to keep all of humanity in their own house for the next few years. Which won't happen.
Champions League qualification doesn’t really matter because it might not even return before the second half of next year and if it does it will be behind closed doors and is basically gonna suck.
It offers a lot of protection if done correctly. It's not that hard to advice people on how to do that. It's as if you think no measures will be in place anymore by then? As if they'd let all people leave at the same time? There's plenty of options to let them leave in an orderly fashion, with respect to social distancing. If you don't have the patience to wait 15-30min to exit the stadium, just watch the game at home.Worst advice people were given was wearing gloves. It offers no protection in reality if not done correctly, in fact it spreads bugs as much as hands if not more.
The issue is that if I go to a supermarket there will not be 25000 people trying to leave all at the same time. There is no way they can make 25k people leaving a stadium safe. Either its safe or its not for full attendance.
They will have to if they wanna attend the game, simple as.I suppose everyone queues in a nice orderly fashion when leaving at Anfield do they? 30k of people all leaving at the same time, pushing, showing, all trying to get out. Sounds like a great idea.
Surveillance at the toilets, stewards in the stadium. You don't want an idiot hugging others (if there's anyone close enough to you to hug anyway), so it's just a case of informing people about their behaviour inside stadiums. If they can't adhere to the rules, they're not welcome. That's the way it's gonna be forward for watching football games in the near future. It's not nearly important enough to risk another hike in cases, so if people are stupid enough to act as they please inside a stadium, it'll be back to no fans soon enough after that.Do you really trust the typical football supporter to actually wash their hands when they go for a piss, not to jump up and down and hug people when someone scores, not to have spit coming out of their mouths when they are abusing the opposition. I don’t.
Worst advice people were given was wearing gloves. It offers no protection in reality if not done correctly, in fact it spreads bugs as much as hands if not more.
The issue is that if I go to a supermarket there will not be 25000 people trying to leave all at the same time. There is no way they can make 25k people leaving a stadium safe. Either its safe or its not for full attendance.
Yes. They also have the political support of the two biggest states in Germany. It‘s a big mistake , but they will go ahead with it.German football is going to start up again mid May if the government gives the green light. They've handled it much better in terms of testing though. Four times as many done compared to the UK.
I hate all this talk Uefa is throwing around about nulling and voiding the domestic season in all countries. I must have come across it a maximum of zero times in that statement.