There's not enough faces or palms for shit like that.
Cop in America doing a bad job, again
- Thread starter Sigma
- Start date
Racing to the bottom is my home state…
It's just the confrontation in the video. The rest is explained in the news clip.
I'm mean surely that stupid as feck. So literally they just challenged some gun toting mass shooting hopeful wannabe, to take up the challenge.
As well as ignoring any semblance of due process (not that there ever one was in the first place). These feckers kill for much less than a person with a gun.
Another execution...
Ridiculouser and Ridiculouser
Jesus fecking christ.
Right through the neck. And then handcuffed him...
Most mass shooters are looking for suicide by cop. He's just promised them the police will oblige as long as the perpetrators fulfil their end of the bargain by commiting more shootings.
Oh ffs that's horrendous...
What fecking scum would do that? I can't read the article (blocked in Europe), but I hope there are at least some consequences.
No doubt he’s on an unplanned vacation with pay. No doubt he wrote in the police report that he saw the suspect’s hands move & he feared for his life. No doubt the police union has rallied around him.
"You fecked with the wrong Marine."
I swear that deputy will hear it from that poor dog's owner (the Marine) again. That deputy is a total cnut for starters.
My advice is to keep your dog leashed and on your own property.
The deputy may have had small children or the dog might have displayed aggressive behaviour. Some dogs are poorly socialised and many dog owners are selfish and negligent when it comes to the safety of others
How does cop semen taste?
How does shooting the dog with a pellet gun resolve your invented scenario?
Do you not think the roided up cop might have said that when the dude confronted him if that were the case? He's just a cnut, like so many cops in America.
Stick to sympathising with dog murderers.
Do you even make a little more research beyond reading just the text in the tweet? That dog was very friendly with the owner's son, so much they were almost inseparable. How about you watch the bloody video?
Honestly, shove your advice where the sun doesn't shine. That deputy is just like most cops in the country: intellectually deficient and unfit for the job.
What up with the unnecessary aggression.?
Firstly, the only video I saw was the one when the man charged onto the Deputy's property accusing him of shooting his dog.
Secondly, I never made any pronouncement as to the Deputy's innocence or guilt. I simply said that dog owners should keep their dogs leashed and on their property. If a dog ventures onto someone else's property and is improperly socialised it might pose a threat to small children and others.
I have been attacked by a trained Belgian Malinois narcotics dog. The dog went for my throat and I was only saved by my great height and preternatural
reflexes. A colleague of mine was not so lucky and he was bitten and had to spend some time in hospital. The dog was deemed sufficiently socialised to be handled by new recruits.I just don't understand the motivation to 'ackshually' here. There is no indication that what you're suggesting is remotely relevant.
Semper dork.
What up with the unnecessary aggression.?
Firstly, the only video I saw was the one when the man charged onto the Deputy's property accusing him of shooting his dog.
Secondly, I never made any pronouncement as to the Deputy's innocence or guilt. I simply said that dog owners should keep their dogs leashed and on their property. If a dog ventures onto someone else's property and is improperly socialised it might pose a threat to small children and others.
I have been attacked by a trained Belgian Malinois narcotics dog. The dog went for my throat and I was only saved by my great height and preternatural
If you had anything about you you might consider why Deputy Dickhead wouldn't say anything about the dog being "improperly socialised" if it were the case. He's just a bloodthirsty cnut. With permission to kill people and animals. Yay.
Why do you see it necessary to devolve into name calling after only hearing one side of the story?
I have never been a cop sympathizer. I find that American police are too quick to resort to their firearms as a means of resolving conflict but I have sufficient experiences in life to actually want to hear both sides of a story before forming an opinion.
Because he didn't even try and put forward a sensible reason for why he killed his neighbour's dog. What's difficult to understand about why that would be extremely weird if he had actually done it for a good reason? De-escalation doesn't appear to be his strong point there does it?
It's more likely that the cop is improperly socialised based on the evidence we have.
Indeed.
Offer it to whom...the guy who entered onto his property cursing and screaming at him?
Yes. Because he's a policeman who ought to be able to imagine his neighbour might be angry that he'd just shot his dog and who ought to be trained in de-escalation of such a situation. But if you're both thick and fully guilty then there isn't much you can say really is there?
I guess you are an expert in de-escalation.
Some may see him getting an angry man off your property without violence as de-escalation.
But to each his own. I guess
Haven’t watched the video. Did he actually use the ‘A Few Good Men’ line?
I've managed to go through life without shooting anyone's dog without explanation so if that makes me an expert in de-escalation, let's go with that. I think I'm just going to assume you're brainwashed and/or daft if you can't admit his reaction was as guilty as the crime he'd just committed.
Really? He squared up to him and then said he was proud that he shot the man's dog. Some de-escalation.
His wife was actually trying to de-escalate, by trying to get him to come inside.
He had ample opportunity to make excuses or explain himself. It's not like it was a monologue from the dog owner.
The way the conversation went it also seems that the poor dog went on his property for the first time.