He obviously did a far better job than Rangnick, I don’t think anyone was trying to claim it would be otherwise either. We’ll have to see how thing pan out with ETH before judging that decision.
Also, just because Spurs had a bad start, let’s not forget they have Kane and Son. Arsenal have no one near that level of quality.
And who's fault is that? Arteta was given 250+mln.So all the complain about players is a sore excuse. Same situation as us.
And Kane was terrible, cause he wanted to leave. Here is the stats:
Tottenham with Nuno was 9th.
They have played 10 matches, which they lost 5 and won 5. They scored just 9 goals and conceded 16. Their GD was -7. They were dead last in the running department. They were also 2 points behind us. They were at 1.5 PPM.
Let's see them now:
They obviously finish 4th. Conte had 28 league matches, they won 17, lost 6 and drew 5. They scored 60 goals and conceded 24, they earned 56 points, which is 2 PPM. They also finish 13 points above us.
And some Conte haters are saying he wouldn't be able to turn our season. I can't do anything but laugh at this people. Tottenham was nothing before him.
Erik Ten-Hag is nobody compare to Conte, who once again proven that he is top 5 manager in the world, and comes winning the league he is top 3 material.
Short term, long term, this hugely depend on the board and if they backup the manager. Conte is a smart guy and he is searching for the right place to stay for longer. Tottenham isn't that place. But we could have been that place, but board once again failed us.
The difference between being the CL and not be in it, it's huge.