sglowrider
Thinks the caf is 'wokeish'.
I think that’s quite extreme, and I disagree. I’m under no illusions about US foreign policy but I don’t think you’re right.
Gaza?
I think that’s quite extreme, and I disagree. I’m under no illusions about US foreign policy but I don’t think you’re right.
What is china doing right now in terms of foreign policy that is worse than the palestinian genocide?I think that’s quite extreme, and I disagree. I’m under no illusions about US foreign policy but I don’t think you’re right.
What is china doing right now in terms of foreign policy that is worse than the palestinian genocide?
NK?What is china doing right now in terms of foreign policy that is worse than the palestinian genocide?
British authorities believe the Chinese national, whose name wasn’t released, was working on behalf of the United Front Work Department, an arm of the Chinese Communist Party that is used to influence foreign entities.
China is actively backing the russian destruction of Ukraine and its destabilisation of europe. Haven't you noticed?What is china doing right now in terms of foreign policy that is worse than the palestinian genocide?
I have, but that's not worse than genocide.China is actively backing the russian destruction of Ukraine and its destabilisation of europe. Haven't you noticed?
China is no angel also. He is fecking around in myanmar for decades and is siding with russia on the ukraine invasion. I have little doubts that if china ends being and hegemon, will behave similar than US, but till this happens, there is no comparison
I don't really understand the point you are making but I am sure a Ukrainian would disagree.I have, but that's not worse than genocide.
It's a very simple point, really. The state sponsored genocide in palestine is a worse event than the russian invasion of ukraine.I don't really understand the point you are making but I am sure a Ukrainian would disagree.
Historically speaking I think the US's foreign policy compares on the whole pretty favourably with its historic peers.Stable democracy when a huge chunk of the population were second class citizens up until 1965?
I would be much more sympathetic to the USA defenders in this thread if they actually had any moral superiority when it comes to foreign policy.
Historically speaking I think the US's foreign policy compares on the whole pretty favourably with its historic peers.
I think both events are tragedies but the situation in Ukraine is more dangerous and destabilising to global security, in my opinion.It's a very simple point, really. The state sponsored genocide in palestine is a worse event than the russian invasion of ukraine.
In terms of cruelty and human suffering, one is clearly worse.I think both events are tragedies but the situation in Ukraine is more dangerous and destabilising to global security, in my opinion.
I think the US has less influence over Israel, and China has more influence over than Russia, than people think.That's debatable. But regardless, I'm talking about the present.
I think that is highly debatable, and also pointless.In terms of cruelty and human suffering, one is clearly worse.
I think the US has less influence over Israel, and China has more influence over than Russia, than people think.
It's only pointless if you ignore my original post. How can anyone defend american foreign policy with a straight face while warning us of all the possible dangers of chinese foreign policy?I think that is highly debatable, and also pointless.
It's a very simple point, really. The state sponsored genocide in palestine is a worse event than the russian invasion of ukraine.
Unfortunately the US itself is also contributing to the destabilization of global security and the "rules-based international order" through its unconditional support to Israel and condemnation of the ICC.I think both events are tragedies but the situation in Ukraine is more dangerous and destabilising to global security, in my opinion.
Let's not forget the illegal iraqi invasion/war 21 years ago? GW Bush"s made up evidence of WmD. Over 600,000 Iraqis died as a direct result!
Yet no accountability. And the mainstream press/media at that time, in the lead up to the invasion were so supportive of the presented 'evidence'and cocksure the invasion was justifiable?
Not one White House or CIA official were ever brought to justice.
And yet we're suppose to believe all the media reports? How much are just mouthing off what the cia or pentagon wants you to hear? Surely some if the folks here aren't naive parrots?
The reality is in any conflict there are always two 'truths'. It's never so binary. And in some cases there are even fake 'truths".
Then there is the idea that the past is prologue.
How many conflicts has china started versus the US?
Because we in Europe, and the values we care about, are underpinned by the US backed global order. So I defend it because it helps keep me, and many millions around the world, safe. And also because I think western democratic values are on the whole, good things and worth defending. So yes, while the US tangles itself in some stupid, bad and self defeating acts at times, I'd rather have them running the place than the Chinese, who don't give a shit about any of those values. Sorry if that sounds blunt.It's only pointless if you ignore my original post. How can anyone defend american foreign policy with a straight face while warning us of all the possible dangers of chinese foreign policy?
Yeah china is really bad, mate, now can you please stop committing genocide?
Oh dear. The Pentagon/CIA to blame conspiracy theory shite again.
Also, if I had a penny for every time someone quoted the ridiculous Iraqi Body Count numbers without context I'd retire. On redcafe alone we stand at 4.
Blunt and ignorant as hell.Because we in Europe, and the values we care about, are underpinned by the US backed global order. So I defend it because it helps keep me, and many millions around the world, safe. And also because I think western democratic values are on the whole, good things and worth defending. So yes, while the US tangles itself in some stupid, bad and self defeating acts at times, I'd rather have them running the place than the Chinese, who don't give a shit about any of those values. Sorry if that sounds blunt.
This whole conversation is backwards because people are talking about morality - a geopolitical threat is not an assessment of their morality but an assessment of their intentions.
How does US actions in Iraq or Israel/Gaza correlate anything to how much of a threat China is to the Western world?
But aren't China's current borders internationally recognized though? (including Tibet)Has anyone mentioned the Chinese occupation of Tibet, a country it took by force in the early 1950's and refuses to release to this day?
So you believe the reasons they gave for going to war were sound and based on factual evidence? Please explain
China is definitely a thread. US is fecking up countries left and right. Latin america, middle east, asia ....everywhere. topping democratic goverments and putting dictators. Enabling genocide and initiating wars based on lies
China is a what if. US is reality
Has anyone mentioned the Chinese occupation of Tibet, a country it took by force in the early 1950's and refuses to release to this day?
Who here is saying China's actions towards the Uyghurs is OK though?No sir, Han Ethnonationalism isn't a threat.
I love how people here rightfully condemn Israel's actions in Gaza as a genocide but somehow China ethnically cleansing and putting 4-5 million Uighurs into concentration camps is somehow okay.
Who here is saying China's actions towards the Uyghurs is OK though?
Who here is saying China's actions towards the Uyghurs is OK though?
It's more that people tend to be cynical about Western moral superiority vis-a-vis China when it's Western countries (not all, but the US at least) currently providing unconditional support to Israel in carrying out a genocide.Well, the classic whataboutism is a pretty thinly veiled attempt to defend China.
But aren't China's current borders internationally recognized though? (including Tibet)
But isn't the point here that Tibet is now internationally recognized as Chinese territory and Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories is not? If the argument is that the world should not recognize China's presence in Tibet, then that's a different argument.Not the ones around the land China claims as its territory, no.
It is no defence of Israel but Tibet was taken by invasion is held by force. It's a bigger land grab than anything Israel has done, the mountains are higher too and the Chinese definitely don't want to give it back ever.
Inconvenient I know, but true.