LordSpud
Full Member
- Joined
- May 22, 2017
- Messages
- 2,797
Its gone very quiet. The calm before the storm?
Shit is about to off nuclear style
Its gone very quiet. The calm before the storm?
Nuclear explosion in the toilet?Shit is about to off nuclear style
You're not answering anything though. Just claiming to know more yourself. I asked you things and you weren't even man enough to directly respond.
I still believe that Elliott is a bad fit for United but it would be unfair not to post this video as it makes very valid points. There's also a good review about Goldbridge in the end as well.
Are the drains at Old Trafford that bad?Nuclear explosion in the toilet?
Of course it makes a difference on a moral level. A huge difference.
And no way are the Jassim family so rich that they can afford to spend 6 billion plus in cash for no commercial return.
And no way are the Jassim family so rich that they can afford to spend 6 billion plus in cash for no commercial return.
If your research is so good and conclusive why not publish it for the world to scrutinise as it contradicts all the research of financial media, ngo's, think tanks and academia.My research shows that Sheikh Jassim's family are THAT rich and that he can afford to buy the club without state funds.
But in any case I'm not that bothered if it's state backed or not but it's certainly not as certain as some make out - others seem to think this makes a difference on some moral level.
On the conflict rules, as mentioned Red Bull have already paved the way for others and shown that a bit of a boardroom reshuffle is enough to get around these rules. UEFA themselves obviously recognise this and have openly talked about changing the rules which are clearly not enforceable.
If your research is so good and conclusive why not publish it for the world to scrutinise as it contradicts all the research of financial media, ngo's, think tanks and academia.
Why do you believe it will be as controversial? Do you think majority of the fans will be against Jassim, like fans are now against the Glazers?
No, I think it is clear from the (albeit not especially rigorous) polling I have seen on this, that a majority of online fans are in favour of state ownership of United, including on the Caf. Polling on the UWS fanzine suggested the opposite, which is perhaps an indication that match-going fans are not overwhelmingly in support, but even there I suspect it would at least be a sizable minority in favour (if not an outright majority).
While there will remain a significant number of vocal United fans opposed to Qatari ownership even after the takeover, overall opposition will not be as widespread or as vehement as the current opposition to the Glazers (you'd be hard-pressed to find a single United fan anywhere who thinks that the Glazers are good owners). However, unlike in the case the Glazer takeover, where many United fans rightly felt that the media were nowhere near vociferous enough in their criticism of the LBO that has strangled the club for 17 years, external criticism of a Qatar-owned United will be enormous and sustained and will ensure that this takeover, if it happens, will be among the most controversial in the history of the sport.
And the estimates of their wealth from the likes of Forbes are pathetic
Convincing themselves? I'll wait in vain for an example of that. People are saying they don't find it likely, and the reasons given are quite valid but you won't address them because you can't.Answer what exactly?
I don't claim to know more myself, I just try to objectively assess the publicly available info and give a view on it. I see a lot of people convincing themselves that the Glazers will definitely sell and I think it's fair game to call that out.
I will usually answer back if I see the post (sometimes I might miss it or forget it). On occasion I won't answer back because the post is too unintelligible/irrelevant/incoherent and a reply would only initiate a time wasting tit for that would clog up the thread. You don't have an automatic right to a response and getting ingnored doesn't always mean the person doing the ignoring is running scared - although I appreciate that is another common mistruth people tell themselves rather than undertake some self reflection.
Are you saying this research is done using only information on the internet?I've posted it more than once already in both relevant threads
And the estimates of their wealth from the likes of Forbes are pathetic - no idea what NGO, think tank or academia you are referring to
For Hearts?A good example of an extremely wealthy individual buying a football club (just buying it, as it were) would be Roman, I guess.
He paid (reportedly) around 150 million (pounds) at the time.
I don't know exactly how much he was worth at the same time (in terms of supposed private fortune), but he was certainly a billionaire. So, even if he was only worth a single, puny billion, yeah - do the math.
One of the backers for SJR!
For Hearts?
Succession joke... just testing the waters
I've seen numerous posts on here confidently proclaiming that the Glazers can't do a minority deal.
Why exactly do they think they know more than Elliott Investments, who clearly think a minority deal is possible (otherwise they wouldn't be involving themselves this far into the process!)
Also, they talk as if they know the financial situation of the Glazers and know their interests/intentions better than the Glazers do themselves. You don't! There is only a limited amount of public information about the Glazers (based on scrappy briefings and speculation - nobody can 100% stand up the story of a sibbling split or the extent of it) and the in-depth financial picture of the club. Elliott Investments certainly know more about all that stuff than you do.
Telling yourself things you desperately want to be true won't actually make it true.
Succession joke... just testing the waters
That might be (I don't dispute it).
The question is whether Jassim realistically sits on enough (private, individual) wealth to make it plausible that the bid is - genuinely - private/individual in the sense that it is not, in reality, Qatar (the Emir, the state) behind it.
And if you want to, you can throw his dad into the mix: does his dad sit on that kind of money as an individual?
I don't remember what your estimates were (regarding daddy's personal fortune) - but, again, common sense dictates that he'd have to be worth extremely much in order for it to make sense for him to spend 6-8 billion on buying Manchester United with only long-term profit in mind.
The link to properties you say they own says they're owned by QIAYes I believe they do sit on that kind of money via the family office Al Mirqab Capital. This was started by the father (HBJ) and his main focus after leaving his state role in 2013, Jassim himself ran it for several years overseeing various investments in real estate, hospitality etc on behalf of the family.
Some bits of info about the kind of things they own here:
https://www.redcafe.net/threads/act...tential-qatari-ownership.475659/post-30339348
All's quiet on the middle eastern front
For Hearts?
Rubbish, they won't reverse negotiate. They might however see that price and stay firm to 6 bil.No news to the pint the Sky's Kaveh saying the Glazers could raise the price due to the NFL team going for $ 6 billion.
That shows how desperate news corporations are for developments.
The link to properties you say they own says they're owned by QIA
Edit: It doesn't say he owns the Belgravia mansion either.
Ah, right. Never watched it, I'm afraid.
He owns the Belgravia mansion (Forbes House) which will be the most expensive home in the UK:
https://www.standard.co.uk/homesand...ncil-vetoes-staircase-renovation-a135876.html
Yes some of the assets in the long list were deals he did on behalf of QIA