Whitwell from The Athletic said, today, that HBJ has a lot of money. One of the wealthiest men in the world.
Jim Ratcliffe is easily among the 100 wealthiest individuals in the world (as per published lists and whatnot).
Do you think HBJ is somewhere in that ballpark? He isn't on any of the lists, of course, but let's say that much of his actual wealth is unknown.
Anyway, let's say he's in the ballpark for the sake of argument.
Do you think that someone like - say - Jack Ma is likely to spend anywhere between one fourth and one third of his
personal fortune on buying a football club? No financing, no deals, no loans - just buy it, with a third/fourth of his
own money?
Because that's the sort of figures we're talking about (Jack Ma is among the 100 wealthiest individuals in the world, around the middle of the list, he's worth something like 25 billion dollars, much like ol' Jim).
Are we supposed to believe that HBJ (as an individual, a private party, spending his own money independently of anything to do with the Qatari ruling family) would spend a quarter to a third of his personal fortune to buy Manchester United?
Or are we supposed to believe that he's actually considerably/significantly richer than someone like Jack Ma?
How rich is he?
The only party I can think of that would be willing to slap six to seven billion on the table (no financing, no loans, no nothin')...would be someone
extremely rich even in the context of the richest individuals on this planet. Someone whose wealth would positively dwarf that of, say, Jack Ma or Jim Ratcliffe. Or any individual, really.