Club Sale | It’s done!

Status
Not open for further replies.
What principles are on being owned by a company which is one of the biggest polluter in Europe, by a few banks, and by a tax dodger?

Add to that the banks in questions are some of the worst on offer with themselves being reponsible for thousands of lives being ruined and violating laws en masse.
 
I hoped Arnold the rest were given more time, I really liked what I saw and I thought they did quite well in their first season in charge, the way the quickly wrapped up the sabitzer deal after the extent of eriksen's injury became apparent was quite admirable i say.
I very much doubt whoever the new owner is will rip it up instantly.

They'll install their own man to work alongside the current 'power' and see how they work. They'll eventually decide if they want to change how things are ran, and who is good enough to stay etc.
 
It seems like there's a coordinated attempt in the media to de-rail the Qatari bid.

Several articles and journalists in the last few days.

I sense they know its game over for a lot of rivals if we get Qatari investment.

The whole moral high ground nonsense doesn't hold any weight when you look into the shady doings of some companies already sponsoring/working with United (maybe they choose to ignore this).
 
The media will be very anti the Qatari bid because they will be cut-off from the easy back channels they have had for the last few years and will just get positive news releases about investment etc from a better organised club structure.

Whilst the Glazers themselves were fairly reclusive we know that Woodward was always briefing to journalists and prepared to wash linen in public, hanging managers out to dry even if it suited his agenda. This media focus meant we chased "big name" signings to make statements rather than maybe the better, up and coming talent.

If Qatari investment makes the club wholly private again, with Credit Suisse accounts, then the media will be cut off from the usual title tattle we have had from board members and execs with an agenda. This combined with ETH's approach to keeping media at arms length, will mean that the media won't be getting easy clickbait stories and the revenue generated from stories about turmoil behind the scenes at Old Trafford.

I'm not suggesting all the problems will miraculously go away - but they will at least be kept behind closed doors.

The media firestorm that's going to be unleashed is another reason I want to see it happen. I don't usually follow them, but the pure hatred and rage will be epochal, not to mention of the absolute highest order of hypocrisy. It would be remiss of me not to bear witness. I expect certain people's heads to split open out of nothing but pure vitriol.
 
Every sale process should have some deadline as they won't be waiting for the bids forever. However it doesn't mean that the bids submitted tomorrow or later won't be considered.
So it's just us saying 'we'd like the bids in by today, please' and if you want to bid later you do so aware of the dangers of coming in late?
 
Its not good, but then again United's share price has generally traded in the same range from 2014 to the present. Therefore, whatever fan disdain there was for the Glazers, it never manifested itself into financial loss for them that would've compelled them to modify their strategy. That strategy appears to have always been to grow equity in the club and sell to the highest bidder, which is what we're seeing right now.
You have to ask yourself though - is the club growing or simply the PL? I reckon it's the latter. 20 years ago we were THE most popular club, bar none, in terms of popularity and revenue. Even ahead of Madrid who even back then, before their run in the last decade, had more trophies than us. Now we are... what? 4th or 5th? We are not growing as a result of the club becoming more appealing, we've plateaued and I'd argue there's no-one more responsible for that than the Glazers. A name can carry you only so far.
 
I very much doubt whoever the new owner is will rip it up instantly.

They'll install their own man to work alongside the current 'power' and see how they work. They'll eventually decide if they want to change how things are ran, and who is good enough to stay etc.
I hope so, ripping up the structure when it just seems to have started working isn't a very wise thing to do.
 
De Jong chase was down to EtH

Not getting Rabiot was down to Arnold/Murtough not bowing to demands

What are you trying to get at here?

Arnold/EtH/Murtough are working wonders
WTF, Arnold and Murtough, flew to Barcelona in their cheap suits and came back with their tail between the legs, embarrassing for the club, and more so them. Tell your bosses they're about to get sacked for incompetence once we get some decent owners.
 
Yeah, you make good points. It's business to business like you say and the way I look at it is that good PR here makes the point for good management. Then, for that level of business, buying a football club for 5 to 6 billions make sense? I don't think so. So it must be some sort of PR thing. There are many, many ways to invest that level of money for much better profit.

To summaries, it just does not make sense to me to buy the club from purely a profit point of view given the price and future investment needed. It just doesn't; otherwise the Glazers would not sell to begin with. So it must be much more then cost vs profit/debt over a period of time. There must be other benefits. For the middle east it's sports washing (for Quatar is more then that imo) and for INEOS it must be a PR badge like the F1 Mercedes team. If that is so, then you do not get a publicly loved entity for good will just to cripple it in debt and make all emotionally involved with said entity hate your soul.

My view is that anyone outside the middle east is buying it to make profit, whether that means a few years of investment then slowly bleeding it or banking on the super League, they all will want something in return and given the huge asking price (not to mention the opportunity cost that comes with 6bn, you can get excellent returns in other areas with that kind of money) I can't see it ending well for us
 
It seems like there's a coordinated attempt in the media to de-rail the Qatari bid.

Several articles and journalists in the last few days.

I sense they know its game over for a lot of rivals if we get Qatari investment.

The whole moral high ground nonsense doesn't hold any weight when you look into the shady doings of some companies already sponsoring/working with United (maybe they choose to ignore this).

What… on Earth?

Do you actually believe that?
 
De Jong chase was down to EtH

Not getting Rabiot was down to Arnold/Murtough not bowing to demands

What are you trying to get at here?

Arnold/EtH/Murtough are working wonders

The fact that it was Rabiot who said turned us down and if he hadn't he would be stinking up OT. We got lucky there.

If you were the new owner would you trust Arnold+Murtough to preside over a hefty budget and the task to lead us back to the upper echelons of world football?
We need total pros who have been there and done that.

The structure we have in place is the remains of Woody's failed disneyland experiment. They aren't the best people for the job. A cultural reset at the top could only do us good.

I'm sure ETH will thrive with more competent people incharge. He is used to the likes of VDS and Overmars.
 
So it's just us saying 'we'd like the bids in by today, please' and if you want to bid later you do so aware of the dangers of coming in late?

Also it's more like you have to provide an outlier of an offer plus proof of funds so that the seller knows you are a serious option.
 
It really depends on how they conduct themselves.

If we're working on a net budget of 150m for transfers then out club will be sustaining itself. If we do a Chelsea and spend 600m in a year then your right.

Newcastle haven't been extravagant and if they get top 4 imo it wouldn't be a hollow achievement

But we have an example on how they conduct their business, and it's not the way Newcastle is doing it. I'm sorry, but I don't buy it for a second that the fans who want them don't want them for their money and the hope of big investments in the squad and that's okay, but at least we should have the balls to admit that this makes us just as bad as the rest of the state sponsored clubs.
 
Morals, ethics and "the right thing" is long gone in today's football, and society in general anyways. Any of you chosing to end your support of a football club because of the owners will do nothing to change that. It's only you who lose out on that. So why bother sitting alone on some pale white horse outside of a castle on a high ground or whatever... For nothing?

If you're so desperate to support a club that will win nothing the next years go check out Southampton or something like that.

Every big ambitious club these days has some shady buisness going on.

Man Utd is as we all know an institute and one of the biggest brands of the world. With owners who actually put money into the club instead of taking it out the club will undoubtedly again start compete and win the biggest titles. As a lifelong United fan I would love to see that one more time. Wouldn't you?

Gas money from Qatar or oil money from Saudi, mob money from Mexico, drug money from you local corner, who cares...
Get down from your high horses, stop being so incoherently snobby.
Be realistic and be supportive of your club.
 
The only way INEOS' investment is justified is if the value of the club increases quite a lot over the coming years, so perhaps some form of future payments tied to some measure of that?

yeah but if the Glazers are selling in total why does future value matter to them.

Surely the value is relative to today!
 
If Qatar comes in and rips up the existing management structure, they can fecking do one. Just now finally after a decade of mismanagement, Ten Hag has got people who are working with him and results are showing on the pitch. They rip it up and bring someone in who is not on the same page as Ten Hag and then he gets the boot and we will have a merry go round of managers just like Chelsea. All these thoughts suddenly make me think that we should ideally just stay put where we are. Cannot let Ten Hag go without setting this club right. He is exactly what the club is looking for. Even Murtough and Arnold have done a good job. It's just our facilities and the stadium which needs renovations and uplifting. Rather get someone in with a minority stake who can deliver on those things.
 
So it's just us saying 'we'd like the bids in by today, please' and if you want to bid later you do so aware of the dangers of coming in late?

Think of it more like the bids that go in today set the benchmark and one of them will likely be the winning bid, but the soft deadline leaves the door open for a latecomer to have a look at whats on the table and come in with an astronomical bid and blow everyone out of the water.
 
It really depends on how they conduct themselves.

If we're working on a net budget of 150m for transfers then out club will be sustaining itself. If we do a Chelsea and spend 600m in a year then your right.

Newcastle haven't been extravagant and if they get top 4 imo it wouldn't be a hollow achievement
Newcastle were facing a relegation scrap and then had the LARGEST EVER net spend in one window to get to where they are now.
 
If Qatar comes in and rips up the existing management structure, they can fecking do one. Just now finally after a decade of mismanagement, Ten Hag has got people who are working with him and results are showing on the pitch. They rip it up and bring someone in who is not on the same page as Ten Hag and then he gets the boot and we will have a merry go round of managers just like Chelsea. All these thoughts suddenly make me think that we should ideally just stay put where we are. Cannot let Ten Hag go without setting this club right. He is exactly what the club is looking for. Even Murtough and Arnold have done a good job. It's just our facilities and the stadium which needs renovations and uplifting. Rather get someone in with a minority stake who can deliver on those things.
Calm down, they have already leaked via media that ETH would be significantly backed.
The people that would be replaced would be the useless lot like Murtough and Arnold.

If you dont think they are useless, we could have got Anthony for 40m at the start of last summer but pontificated and wasted time until we had to pay 100m last min.
 
Oh, yeah, indeed. EtH coaches the players, identified the right transfers (plus a world class player every Tom, Dick and Harry knows about) and Murtough flew to Torino and Barcelona and closed jack shit.

The only distinguishable excellence at this club in the last 10 years can be traced to our new manager. The rest can jog on. This can also be seen in articles like the one at the start of last summer where EtH binned off all their scouting suggestions.

You don't think ETH had no input on the decision to spend so much time & effort in trying to get frenkie? It was clearly driven by his input.
 
My view is that anyone outside the middle east is buying it to make profit, whether that means a few years of investment then slowly bleeding it or banking on the super League, they all will want something in return and given the huge asking price (not to mention the opportunity cost that comes with 6bn, you can get excellent returns in other areas with that kind of money) I can't see it ending well for us
The solution here can only come from the English. Have the government treat football clubs as cultural assets and make a Germany like system with 50%+1 ownership by fans.

That will not happen because the "3ed World country" cities like Manchester and London and what not are in so much need of gangster and dictators investment that any and all are ok. It took literal War on a big scale for England politicians (and pundits and "respectable" people) to even look at all the russian gangsters taking over businesses and laundering money in England.

Just seen a video from TIFO how watching football in England is by far the most expensive in Europe. Like almost 2 times more expensive then Germany. So all that money from gangsters and dictators has been put to good use in service of the fans then.
 
If Qatar comes in and rips up the existing management structure, they can fecking do one. Just now finally after a decade of mismanagement, Ten Hag has got people who are working with him and results are showing on the pitch. They rip it up and bring someone in who is not on the same page as Ten Hag and then he gets the boot and we will have a merry go round of managers just like Chelsea. All these thoughts suddenly make me think that we should ideally just stay put where we are. Cannot let Ten Hag go without setting this club right. He is exactly what the club is looking for. Even Murtough and Arnold have done a good job. It's just our facilities and the stadium which needs renovations and uplifting. Rather get someone in with a minority stake who can deliver on those things.

A CEO is generally not the SME you see at the coal face - for the team managment ETH clearly is. A good CEO will realise that the whole value of the business is dependent on the team producing and ETH is clearly the best person to do that.

People need to calm down.
The back end business management may change but currently it would be just stupid to relieve ETH
 
PSG - the only ones actually owned by Qatar - have been an absolute shit show, and actively engaged in exactly the same stupid galactico policy as Woodward. Big whoop they’ve won the French league a lot.

They went from irrelevancy to attracting Messi to the club.

The CL isn't exactly an easy trophy to win. But PSG and citeh are always in the mix for it.

Which can only be said for a handful of clubs in the world right now.

I'd be more than happy with that each year. We are sadly far away from that sort of consistency.
 
If Qatar comes in and rips up the existing management structure, they can fecking do one. Just now finally after a decade of mismanagement, Ten Hag has got people who are working with him and results are showing on the pitch. They rip it up and bring someone in who is not on the same page as Ten Hag and then he gets the boot and we will have a merry go round of managers just like Chelsea. All these thoughts suddenly make me think that we should ideally just stay put where we are. Cannot let Ten Hag go without setting this club right. He is exactly what the club is looking for. Even Murtough and Arnold have done a good job. It's just our facilities and the stadium which needs renovations and uplifting. Rather get someone in with a minority stake who can deliver on those things.
ETH and his coaches will be the only ones safe. Arnold and Murtough are gone. The entire structure will be reorganized.

Qatar buys United
Hire Woodward as CEO
Sack ETH
Hire Galtier
Sign Ronaldo
To be fair, dont even need Woodward, Nasser isn't that much better
 
What… on Earth?

Do you actually believe that?
They did the same thing with EtH last year. There weren't any mainstream journalists pushing for EtH, or writing glowing articles on him, because they knew they had zero connection to him, and they wanted the guy they knew and were friendly with in Pochettino.
 
WTF, Arnold and Murtough, flew to Barcelona in their cheap suits and came back with their tail between the legs, embarrassing for the club, and more so them. Tell your bosses they're about to get sacked for incompetence once we get some decent owners.
And they agreed a deal with Barcelona. They did their job there. I quite liked their suits as well.
 
The whole world is waking up to the fact Erik Ten Hag is putting himself into the discussions of best manager currently working in the world. Everyone in the game has taken notice of this, what an absolutely incredible impact he's had on this club. No one in their right mind would be looking to replace EtH, there isn't a name you could put forward that would probably intrigue a small fraction of the fanbase, let alone get them on board with replacing him.
 
From the media have to give respect to Glen Greenwald (had his offices raided, and regularly detained at Airports) probably the only one who did his job during the invasion and occupation and tried to report without any spin

Think you might be misremembering that period, at least the early part. Greenwald wasn’t working as a journalist back then and he has since admitted himself that he accepted the Bush admin’s case for the invasion of Iraq at the time.
 
And they agreed a deal with Barcelona. They did their job there. I quite liked their suits as well.
That's funny, I thought FDJ was wearing the blaugrana last night and not white. In fact that's even more embarrassing, they agreed a deal with a player that had zero interest in coming. Do you know how transfers normally work, you talk to the player, find out if their interested, put a package together, get the go ahead from the player, place a bid. How many players have you seen turn down a transfer to a club that put in a substantial bid for them? Sure sometimes a club like chelsea might pop up, throw ridiculous money at the situation and hijack a move, but these are outlier situations.
 
The whole world is waking up to the fact Erik Ten Hag is putting himself into the discussions of best manager currently working in the world. Everyone in the game has taken notice of this, what an absolutely incredible impact he's had on this club. No one in their right mind would be looking to replace EtH, there isn't a name you could put forward that would probably intrigue a small fraction of the fanbase, let alone get them on board with replacing him.

Chelsea would’ve said the same about Tuchel in his first season

I agree it’s all rosy how, but what about when another flavour of the month comes a long during a dip in form?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.