Blood Mage
2+2=united are rubbish
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2019
- Messages
- 8,054
On paper a front 3 of Mbappe, Rashford and Sancho would be fecking scary (if, hypothetically, Sancho were to rediscover his Dortmund form).
McDermott is full of shit though.
Neither do you.A response of someone who has no point to make. I’m convinced you truly believe you have a moral high ground to stand on, which is absolutely hilarious to me.
You do realise that the heads of state in the US and the UK are not involved in bidding for the club? If they were I'm sure a lot of people would be unhappy about that too. The comparison you are making is completely nonsensical.A response of someone who has no point to make. I’m convinced you truly believe you have a moral high ground to stand on, which is absolutely hilarious to me.
Obviously it would, but its identity would be gradually eroded through foreign ownership, especially that of a nation state seeking to use United to expand the brand of the state, and all the baggage that comes with it. This is why imo, it has to be owned by a private non-state entity with some degree of connection to the club, either by nationality or being a fan.
You might not understand it but it’s there. Anyone that chooses not to support United under Qatari ownership is free to do what THEY believe is right. The idea that it makes them morally superior is complete garbage, and my posts show exactly why it’s complete garbage.Neither do you.
Your attempt at understanding my point is nonsensicalYou do realise that the heads of state in the US and the UK are not involved in bidding for the club? If they were I'm sure a lot of people would be unhappy about that too. The comparison you are making is completely nonsensical.
fecking childish as well.Your attempt at understanding my point is nonsensical
If PSG is what 10 years of Qatari money buys a club then I wouldn't be opening the Champagne anytime soon...
I'm assuming you meant "it wouldn't".
Again, United has been under foreign ownership for nearly two decades. The stature of this club and the status it affords is due to its global appeal - something that United is more than happy to court for financial gain - weird that having an English owner would be core to its "identity", especially when considering it's not owned by English folks.
the whole "selling its identity" just comes off like a dogwhistle - though I don't believe that's your intent.
Proclaiming something is nonsensical without actually understanding it is however the epitome of maturityfecking childish as well.
It should be the owners facilitating Ten Hag in signing the players he wants, not the owners going all out to sign the players they want.
Pretty sure ten Hag would want Mbappe.
Your first mistake was believing Tom Mcdermott what has this wannabe Romano ever got right or exclusive?It should be the owners facilitating Ten Hag in signing the players he wants, not the owners going all out to sign the players they want.
Quite possible.I haven't really followed this. If it's the Qataris would that mean they'd run the club in a similar fashion to how they run PSG? Like an extremely short-term galactico collection with no regard for playing philosophy, squad balance, or managerial authority?
Nobody knows, impossible to answer that really.I haven't really followed this. If it's the Qataris would that mean they'd run the club in a similar fashion to how they run PSG? Like an extremely short-term galactico collection with no regard for playing philosophy, squad balance, or managerial authority?
If so, that would be on par with the two inbred cnuts buying out their siblings and riding on ETH coat-tails whilst plunging the club further into debt and neglecting the stadium/facilities.
All their massive rule breaking aside, City have at least put some thought into how to build the club up. PSG seem to be all about today, or yesterday even.
You only have to look at psg to not want their owners anywhere near us, they are another set of owners that treat their club like a brand first and foremost just like the glazers and they allow the players way too much power at the club over managers, we don't need to be turned back into a circus act of a club again, we will be back to a recruitment strategy of players like the past it ronaldo and pogba's of this world for their brand appeal
Rashy, Osimhen/Kane, Mpabbe looks betterOn paper a front 3 of Mbappe, Rashford and Sancho would be fecking scary (if, hypothetically, Sancho were to rediscover his Dortmund form).
McDermott is full of shit though.
To be fair they sign players for CL success and have a shallow pool of players who would want to leave for the French League.I haven't really followed this. If it's the Qataris would that mean they'd run the club in a similar fashion to how they run PSG? Like an extremely short-term galactico collection with no regard for playing philosophy, squad balance, or managerial authority?
If so, that would be on par with the two inbred cnuts buying out their siblings and riding on ETH coat-tails whilst plunging the club further into debt and neglecting the stadium/facilities.
All their massive rule breaking aside, City have at least put some thought into how to build the club up. PSG seem to be all about today, or yesterday even.
Yup.Musk and Qatar. Musk or Qatar. It’s too grim for words.
All their massive rule breaking aside, City have at least put some thought into how to build the club up. PSG seem to be all about today, or yesterday even.
I haven't really followed this. If it's the Qataris would that mean they'd run the club in a similar fashion to how they run PSG? Like an extremely short-term galactico collection with no regard for playing philosophy, squad balance, or managerial authority?
If so, that would be on par with the two inbred cnuts buying out their siblings and riding on ETH coat-tails whilst plunging the club further into debt and neglecting the stadium/facilities.
All their massive rule breaking aside, City have at least put some thought into how to build the club up. PSG seem to be all about today, or yesterday even.
Didn't this guy borrow money to buy Twitter?
City’s signings before Pep were hit and miss. Much like Liverpool before klopp. The manager really does make a huge difference. Thankfully we now have a top one.Yup they still seem to have on idea what they're doing even with a DOF.
City is part skill and part Pep. Remains to be seen if they'll be this disciplined after he leaves.
All speculation as no one knows the answer. Could be anything from „We (the owners) want to show who we are, we will appoint a new manager, buy whichever player we want, we make the decisions, big name players are more important than the manager” to “we trust ETH, we will support him and invest in further improving the current team as well as stadium and training facilities”.I haven't really followed this. If it's the Qataris would that mean they'd run the club in a similar fashion to how they run PSG? Like an extremely short-term galactico collection with no regard for playing philosophy, squad balance, or managerial authority?
If so, that would be on par with the two inbred cnuts buying out their siblings and riding on ETH coat-tails whilst plunging the club further into debt and neglecting the stadium/facilities.
All their massive rule breaking aside, City have at least put some thought into how to build the club up. PSG seem to be all about today, or yesterday even.
Pretty sure ten Hag would want Mbappe.
City’s signings before Pep were hit and miss. Much like Liverpool before klopp. The manager really does make a huge difference. Thankfully we now have a top one.
Didn't this guy borrow money to buy Twitter?
Your first mistake was believing Tom Mcdermott what has this wannabe Romano ever got right or exclusive?
Yeah that is the big worry. They’re briefing they’ll give him whatever he wants…hopefully that isn’t just PR. If he does know football he won’t be getting rid of ETH.And if the new owners have any sense they'll back him. It's a worry to be fair.