Club Sale | It’s done!

Status
Not open for further replies.
But… in that post he admitted he believed in Allah. So he does believe they’ll be punished.

I tried to send a DM to the guy apologising if I’ve been overly harsh. I admire his faith but just don’t agree with how that post was phrased.
So what, man? This is a United forum. Everyone has a variety of different beliefs and backgrounds. We're not a monolith

Leaving aside everything else, I'd hope we we wouldn't actually be run like PSG have been with the insane deals for Neymar and Mbappe as well as the stink of player power that constantly hangs over the club.
Absolutely agree with this. PSG are badly run Madrid Galacticos circus. As bad as the Glazers are, one good thing about their ownership i'd say is that they're relatively hands free. I wish the new owners are like that too. Invest in the outside stuff, but keep the running of the club to the manager.
 
Better not be Musk. The way he is running Twitter makes one wonder if he wants to be known as Alone Musk.
 
When Elon Musk bought twitter did that mean every twitter employee and user now represents his values and beliefs?

Will anyone who was previously anti tesla instantly change their view?

If I'm a lib dem voter and the tories are in power, am I responsible for all the awful policies they bring in? Will I become a tory myself?

I'm not arguing for Qatar ownership here I'm highlighting a flawed argument that whoever owns United will represent us as fans. We have zero say in who buys the club. We lost that chance when the club was floated and not enough people joined shareholders United / bought a couple of shares, to get us the collective 10% needed to block any sale.
 
Sadly the western media just spin spin spin and people lap it up.

I wonder how many have actually been to the ME and lived there for a period of time.

No country or regime is perfect. But a lot of people clearly have an agenda.

So Amnesty International are part of the western media now?
 
Leaving aside everything else, I'd hope we we wouldn't actually be run like PSG have been with the insane deals for Neymar and Mbappe as well as the stink of player power that constantly hangs over the club.
I think that's more of a case for raising the clubs profile and the leagues profile. No one wants to play in France unless the money is daft and the club were only founded in the 1980's.
 
But… in that post he admitted he believed in Allah. So he does believe they’ll be punished.

I tried to send a DM to the guy apologising if I’ve been overly harsh. I admire his faith but just don’t agree with how that post was phrased.

As opposed to let's say Leviticus 20:13?
"If a man also lie with mankind as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death."
 
Have you followed the conversation?

Because if you have that post makes no sense.
Yes. Relatively. You have a problem that his religion is against homosexuals. So fecking what? Is it any news that Islam is against homosexuality and that Muslims are followers of United? I don't get it.
 
Middle Eastern blood money, the worlds smartest idiot or our very own ‘soccer loving’ asset stripping yank?

Jeez it’s like picking which member of your own family to f.uck.
 
he doesn’t say that.

he says he is not against individuals but due to his religion believes the nature of it is wrong. He then implies they will be punished in the afterlife.
I’m literally reading what he said. He’s telling you he can separate religious beliefs from his own and be tolerant to those who who don’t share them. There’s not much more we can ask.
It’s like Ireland. Incredibly catholic but we are one of the most liberal countries on earth, overwhelmingly voting in gay marriage etc.
Anyway I’ll leave it at that. No point in going around in circles
 
When Elon Musk bought twitter did that mean every twitter employee and user now represents his values and beliefs?

Will anyone who was previously anti tesla instantly change their view?

If I'm a lib dem voter and the tories are in power, am I responsible for all the awful policies they bring in? Will I become a tory myself?

I'm not arguing for Qatar ownership here I'm highlighting a flawed argument that whoever owns United will represent us as fans. We have zero say in who buys the club. We lost that chance when the club was floated and not enough people joined shareholders United / bought a couple of shares, to get us the collective 10% needed to block any sale.
Nobody feels as connected to their place of work, the manufacturer of their car, or their political party as they do to the football club they support (unless they are complete weirdos). It's a false equivalence which seem to be regularly made in this thread in attempting to justify why United being state backed is completely fine.
 
I can’t say I’ve ever been impressed by the way PSG has been run. Yes they’ve spent money, but it’s often looked so poorly managed and as if no one really knows what they’re doing on the football side or things.

Hopefully they get the right people in place here, and if the right people are already in place, leave them to it.
 
I’m literally reading what he said. He’s telling you he can separate religious beliefs from his own and be tolerant to those who who don’t share them. There’s not much more we can ask.
It’s like Ireland. Incredibly catholic but we are one of the most liberal countries on earth, overwhelmingly voting in gay marriage etc.
Anyway I’ll leave it at that. No point in going around in circles

Is suggesting they’ll be punished in hell and that they’re against homosexuality because of his religion the most we can ask for?
 
Yes. Relatively. You have a problem that his religion is against homosexuals. So fecking what? Is it any news that Islam is against homosexuality and that Muslims are followers of United? I don't get it.
I thinks it's a good thing to be against any and all forms of homophobia.
 
So assuming Mbappe will play off the left, will we put Rashford through the middle or shove him out to the right to accommodate Haaland?
 
So fecking what? That’s a pretty big so what.
Can we leave the social issues outside of this board? This is a football forum. Why is everything got to be so political? You don't even know the guy and you're more than likely never going to meet him. Can we just discuss the football club?
I thinks it's a good thing to be against any and all forms of homophobia.
I didn't argue otherwise, I just don't find any point in trying to argue over something like this with someone you don't even know. I mean, is there a specific set of requirements that a United supporter has to adhere to in order to be eligble?
 
I wonder how much of this more recent groundswell for Qatari/Middle Eastern ownership is pushed by Arab/Muslim fans who want their club owned by an Arab/Muslim and are more desensitised to the horrors of those nations.
 
That’s a hell of an argument. Pick the guy who won the Champions League twice.

My point is, it's hard to win champions league, the times when we walked the league even then we were beaten by teams, also there is lots of luck, injuries refree decisions etc involved that's why I would not hold not winning the champions league against their ownership.

If they were knocked out in group stages of round of 16 all seasons then I would have been with you and critisizing their ownership, but winning the champions League is very tough.
 
As much as the Qatar option brings with it problems, I'd choose them ahead of the Elon Musk, whose rumoured to be interested. He's made a complete shite-house mess of Twitter and I simply don't think he's the financial genius others belevee him to be. Plus I don't find his politics any more inviting than many others. possibly the only worse option is the (rumoured) bid of two glazer brothers to buy out the others
 
I wonder how much of this more recent groundswell for Qatari/Middle Eastern ownership is pushed by Arab/Muslim fans who want their club owned by an Arab/Muslim and are more desensitised to the horrors of those nations.
I think it's more to do with most fans being worried about being left behind with the direction football is going in.
 
Thank feck for the tweets only thread. It really does get quite depressing coming onto a football forum and reading discussions relating to rape, murder, racism, homophobia etc.

Well if we're owned by Qatar then its inevitable that those sort of topics will obviously come up pretty often. So you should probably brace yourself mate
 
I’m literally reading what he said. He’s telling you he can separate religious beliefs from his own and be tolerant to those who who don’t share them. There’s not much more we can ask.
It’s like Ireland. Incredibly catholic but we are one of the most liberal countries on earth, overwhelmingly voting in gay marriage etc.
Anyway I’ll leave it at that. No point in going around in circles

It's legal to be gay in Ireland.
 
So assuming Mbappe will play off the left, will we put Rashford through the middle or shove him out to the right to accommodate Haaland?

Nah. You've got it all wrong.

It's the Qataris ffs!

Benzema, Pogba, Salah, Kante, Partey, Ansu Fati, Gueye, Konate, Dembele....

There's also going to be a mosque in the middle of Stretford end.
 
You must love a bit a yoga. Just don't stretch any further or you'll do some damage to yourself!

You must love a bit a yoga. Just don't stretch any further or you'll do some damage to yourself!

It's a serious point. One of hypocrisy.

Ok, even if you want to make the distinction on this point between direct owner and the state where the football club/company is located (I don't think it's that simple) - many of the same people who will protest against Qatari ownership for human rights abuses will know nothing of, and say nothing about the human rights abuses of the state where the club is located and which has ultimate oversight.

I think 'sports washing' is a very simplistic concept that is lazily attributed as the motivation behind these purchases. If that's the case, the Qataris bought PSG to 'sportswash'. Yet I don't think their ownership of that club helped them one iota with regards the global perception of their country for the World Cup. In reality, the considerations these people make before buying assets like football clubs are far more complex and less controversial.
 
Can we leave the social issues outside of this board? This is a football forum.

Obviously not. In a world where a team I love is being owned by a group that according to Amnesty International (and other human rights organisations) treat migrant workers, women and homosexuals badly - then obviously that’s worth of a discussion. We can’t just bury our heads in the sand. This is a massive reckoning for our fanbase and some will feel awful about it happening. It’s not something we can just ignore - it’s massive and has tk be spoken about.
 
Obviously not. In a world where a team I love is being owned by a group that according to Amnesty International (and other human rights organisations) treat migrant workers, women and homosexuals badly - then obviously that’s worth of a discussion. We can’t just bury our heads in the sand. This is a massive reckoning for our fanbase and some will feel awful about it happening. It’s not something we can just ignore - it’s massive and has tk be spoken about.
Not a fan of whataboutisms but I thought you were referring to the Tories for a second on that bolded line.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.