Have you learned nothing from Ronaldo? Never ever go backI'm considering texting an ex
Have you learned nothing from Ronaldo? Never ever go backI'm considering texting an ex
I think Ratcliffe’s all talk. He offered to buy them for £4m after the deadline was set for potential buyers to make their offer. He would’ve known fine well they’d have no intention of accepting his “bid”.
There were some fairly massive mitigating factors with Chelsea mind, it’s not something we can point to as a normal deal.Think it will be one by January tbh. How long did the Chelsea one take?
How was your last day at work?Ronaldo gone. Glazers looking to sell.
Going to walk up to my boss and demand a 100% hike today at work
It's going to feck up our transfer window isnt it. Can't see them agreeing to any sizable transfers whilst things are in motion.
Some good points, but you have a pretty narrow definition of cash cow. Imo, a cash cow is an asset that returns largesse either now (dividends) or in the future (proceeds from sale).This has been on the cards for a while hasn't it.
The idea that Manchester United was a 'cash cow' for the Glazers was and has always been a huge myth.
Due to gross mismanagement resulting in outrageous amounts of money wasted on dud transfers and in wages paid to undeserving players, the club has been just about breaking-even financially.
The dividends the Glazer family took were a total Red Herring. It creates good clickbait because it causes outrage amongst fans who don't really understand the numbers involved but the money take was such an insignificant amount in the grand scheme of things it was always a total non-story. When you consider the opportunity cost of the Glazers having their cash tied-up in United (i.e. the cost of the options they haven't chosen) then it's actually a massive loser for them.
Sure, huge amounts of money have been drained out of the club, but most of it has been paid to the investment banks who loaned the Glazer family the money to buy the club. Incredible waste and incredibly frustrating for fans...but again, not something the Glazers profited from directly. We often see that £2BN figure banded about by the Green & Gold campaign but it needs to be understood....the Glazers haven't taken that and banked it, it's been spent paying interest!
So with the club not really generating profit (after transfers etc...), the stadium crumbling, the facilities requiring major investment, oil money clubs making it increasingly difficult to secure top four, the ESL on the back-burner for now...the only real way for the Glazers to make big money on United is to sell.
Of course, when they do sell, they'll have made a huge profit without spending a penny of their own money and despite grossly mis-managing their asset....but that's the World we live in people! The system is rigged and the wealthy are too big to fail!
I think we’re more likely to spend something if they are confident of a sale. They need to protect their investment, won’t want to drop away from top four and it will just be more debt that won’t be their problem.
How was your last day at work?
Yep, as @crossy1686 mentioned before recent earnings call, people were betting on the stock hitting a certain price by a certain date.
This usually happens when you have some catalysts e.g. rumours of sale. And given that options activity for our stock is limited (people don't speculate on it much), what you see above is way out of the ordinary and shows the insiders with connections made money.
You may like to believe it, but there is absolutely no chance.Makes you think whether thats why they ended up spunking that 200m+ when they knew it didnt matter to them anymore?
I would like to believe Mr (or Mrs) New Owner agreed to spend it in the Summer which would be a good sign.
You may like to believe it, but there is absolutely no chance.
The Glazers needed to protect their investment. Now there’s more of a good feel around the place they can sell for many times more money than what they put it, as forecasts are much better. Look after the pennies and they make the pounds etc…
Can see them being potential buyershttps://www.arabianbusiness.com/lif...ubai-on-red-alert-to-make-surprise-10-6bn-bid
It's a few hours old. Is Arabian Business a reputable news outlet?
Yes, in the Middle East they are reputable.https://www.arabianbusiness.com/lif...ubai-on-red-alert-to-make-surprise-10-6bn-bid
It's a few hours old. Is Arabian Business a reputable news outlet?
Dubai don't officially own Manchester City, it is someone from Dubai, so you would think another person from Dubai could buy United. Same with states who apparently don't own Newcastle and PSG either.
Yes, in the Middle East they are reputable.
I live in Dubai and it's actually been rumoured here for a while that Dubai/Owners of Emirates Airlines were interested in buying Manchester United. The crown prince of Dubai is a well known fan of United.
It does not. It is around 40-50m extra per year, which is still a large sum of money.Utd with no debt and no dividends being taken out puts an extra £100m every year in the coffers for players. That’s huge. That’s before the owner even puts any of their own money in.
Glazers really have drained us!
Are they as rich as Newcastle/City owners?
No one is as rich as the Newcastle owners. City owners are richer than Dubai but the thing is, with Dubai in charge of United, with the takeover clearing our debts, we will be more than self sufficient to compete. Add in the influx of cash they’ll provide, we’d be able to match any of them financially. I’m more excited by the infrastructure they’ll provide to the club from Carrington, to Old Trafford and the reserves and female stadium.Are they as rich as Newcastle/City owners?
Not even close.
How far off are we talkingNot even close.
No one is as rich as the Newcastle owners. City owners are richer than Dubai but the thing is, with Dubai in charge of United, with the takeover clearing our debts, we will be more than self sufficient to compete. Add in the influx of cash they’ll provide, we’d be able to match any of them financially. I’m more excited by the infrastructure they’ll provide to the club from Carrington, to Old Trafford and the reserves and female stadium.
I have family in Milesplatting, Ancoats in Manchester and I’ve been around the surrounding areas and to see what Abu Dhabi has done for City and the area is remarkable. Back then it was just the Asda supermarket that was the flagship of that area but they’ve developed the whole area and added so much value. Dubai would really do the same for United. With our fan base and commercial viability, we’d be the top guns in all areas once again soon.
I am not great at geography.So, all Emiratis look the same to you eh?
Glazers are really going to make billions after years of mismanagement and neglect to invest in infrastructure
I can't think of anyone with 5 billion (let alone 10) to spend that I would really welcome.
True but still rich. Still more able to afford the club than a us investor, consortium or a billionaire. In regards to arab state ownership they are probably the lesser of 2 evils. I don't really care about them being as as rich or close to Manchester Citys owners wealth. Just want them to run the club well.Not even close.
I do not think Glazers care about what happens with the club when they are out. it can all get burned for all they care, as long as they get the money.I think the best we can hope for is like a Boehly type consortium leathered with rules and regulations to protect the interests of the club.
Which is somewhat fair enough, considering this is a business asset to themI do not think Glazers care about what happens with the club when they are out. it can all get burned for all they care, as long as they get the money.
Think we have spent, but more signings in the hope of attracting sponsors and social media coverage. When instead if you sign players who are the right player to propel you to success the other things come anyway. They wanted to make a quick buck.It's never boring is it! Honestly, ETH has finally managed to cobble together a team and tactic that doesn't wobble too much and we can use as a platform to build on, then Ronaldo goes into full toys out of pram mode, now we have a possible ownership change, what a soap opera... Just hope it doesn't damage the morale of the squad as it did look like we were starting to get something going.
The Glazers have spent money at least as comparable as most other big clubs during their ownership, just such as pity they've never seemed to have a cohesive plan in place, so the majority of it was wasted, like, Sanchez was a massive mistake as his legs had gone and the wages were ridiculous, then they repeat that with Ronaldo, fingers crossed they go and the new owners kill the debt, renovate the stadium, give the fans a voice and put a management structure in place that actually involves people who know how to run a successful sport operation.
Nowhere near.Are they as rich as Newcastle/City owners?
Makes you think whether thats why they ended up spunking that 200m+ when they knew it didnt matter to them anymore?
I would like to believe Mr (or Mrs) New Owner agreed to spend it in the Summer which would be a good sign.
No one is as rich as the Newcastle owners. City owners are richer than Dubai but the thing is, with Dubai in charge of United, with the takeover clearing our debts, we will be more than self sufficient to compete. Add in the influx of cash they’ll provide, we’d be able to match any of them financially. I’m more excited by the infrastructure they’ll provide to the club from Carrington, to Old Trafford and the reserves and female stadium.
I have family in Milesplatting, Ancoats in Manchester and I’ve been around the surrounding areas and to see what Abu Dhabi has done for City and the area is remarkable. Back then it was just the Asda supermarket that was the flagship of that area but they’ve developed the whole area and added so much value. Dubai would really do the same for United. With our fan base and commercial viability, we’d be the top guns in all areas once again soon.