This is one of the silliest posts I’ve read today.They’re the only ones who have confirmed their interest
This is one of the silliest posts I’ve read today.They’re the only ones who have confirmed their interest
Pep Guardiola is a decent manager (but I'd be a decent manager with prime Lionel Messi in my team!). I think we are seeing recently that without a strong assistant manager (e.g. Mikel Arteta) he is prone to making weird decisions - the team setup vs Spurs on Sunday for example, and when he did get City to a CL final he decided to 'experiment' when if he had stuck to the system and the players that had got them there, he would have probably won it.
Yes please...
ok...first off 15% increase in the stock price is insane value for anyone who owns a substantial amount of shares
secondly....anyone who is worth 335billion well taht is just downright disgusting to have that much wealth. The question of that wealth is it liquidable assets?? or is that based on tehm being the ruling family of Qatar and that is based on value of the State for oil and other investments?
Nah Pep has always been an eccentric tactician experimenting all over the place. I mean he was the one that stuck Messi in the middle and popularized the whole "false 9" position in recent times. Also turned Lahm into a DM at Bayern, as well as a bunch of other stuff. Don't think the other day was any different. It's the one drawback you get with Pep, he's always trying to outsmart the game and sometimes it comes back to bite him.
It's his family being worth that much, and definitely isn't liquid to that extent. Definitely more based on them being the ruling family
I'm not a great believer in what he says but Phil Brown said this in Dec:
But whether or not he was just stating what I thought would be an obvious thing I dunno.
I'm not a great believer in what he says but Phil Brown said this in Dec:
But whether or not he was just stating what I thought would be an obvious thing I dunno.
We don't need to do the financial doping bs that City did.Do we really want to risk the club especially after what happen at shitty ?
Isn’t it an easy enough shout when Beckham is working with Qatar before this and Glazer was literally photographed over there?this wouldn't shock me one bit given Beckham's relationship with them from his time at PSG
City are a non-club. They couldn't and still can't afford their spending. We can. All we need is an owner who will take care of the other side of business - debt and infrastructure mainly. The club has more than enough revenue to pay for wages and transfer expenses.Do we really want to risk the club especially after what happen at shitty ?
Haha yearly from memoryIs that financial quarter or yearly quarter?
We get owned by any of them oil states and 7 years from now we'll get dragged down the same mud the city cnuts are in now. Don't trust them for shits. They'll stain the club with their filth. It is a very sad fact that it's looking close to really happening.
I'm not a great believer in what he says but Phil Brown said this in Dec:
But whether or not he was just stating what I thought would be an obvious thing I dunno.
I agree with your statement 100% but unfortunately we are not in an either/or situation which is hard on everyone because every supporter will have a struggle with it one way or another. It's difficult to find a billionaire in the ideal status to invest in this club and much less, a Man Utd supporting billionaire.I always hate this argument. Do you love your hotel, the aircraft you fly, gas in your hob, mobile phone supplier, the car you drive as you love United and have a connection with? Anyone who doesn't like us going that path, just let them. Why always bring up these stupid arguments. I, myself, am not sure how I feel about it and how I will feel if it actually happens. If its a consortium, it might be different, but even then I'm not sure.
His personal wealth is his family's and, therefore, his country's wealth. If he's getting involved, then the Qatari state is definitely getting involved. It's why I don't think this private investment group will involve him.
Is that financial quarter or yearly quarter?
If that's all we need then Ratcliffe or any consortium can do it. We just need them to wipe out the debt and sort the stadium and put the right people in charge. Don't get the obsession with oil.City are a non-club. They couldn't and still can't afford their spending. We can. All we need is an owner who will take care of the other side of business - debt and infrastructure mainly. The club has more than enough revenue to pay for wages and transfer expenses.
Sure sounds like a standup fella
Can we do anything and do the majority really care?Do we really want to risk the club especially after what happen at shitty ?
If that's all we need then Ratcliffe or any consortium can do it. We just need them to wipe out the debt and sort the stadium and put the right people in charge. Don't get the obsession with oil.
I don't think Ratcliffe can do it. He needs to spend 6+ billion, plus another 2 billion for the stadium and training grounds, plus another billion for the debt. And this is not a business decision because the person willing to do that wouldn't expect any sort of profit in the near future for his money. That leaves only oil states or tech giants. The latter is highly unlikely because they don't need to invest in football clubsIf that's all we need then Ratcliffe or any consortium can do it. We just need them to wipe out the debt and sort the stadium and put the right people in charge. Don't get the obsession with oil.
Do we really want to risk the club especially after what happen at shitty ?
For me its not about transfers or even the debt because I believe a few seasons of continuous CL qualifications will see our revenues bring it to an acceptable level or if wished ensure we pay it down over the years.We don't need oil money to compete but it's the quickest path to clearing the debt those leeches saddled us with.
Why would someone simply put money from their own pocket ? If they clear the debt it would be by keeping Club as a collateral. No one is putting their personal money because they love the club.If that's all we need then Ratcliffe or any consortium can do it. We just need them to wipe out the debt and sort the stadium and put the right people in charge. Don't get the obsession with oil.