Floyd
Doesn't like his Tagline played with
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2000
- Messages
- 8,545
Make it happen.
Not sure about the collar, otherwise that is just pure sex.
Make it happen.
Fans were saying this twenty years ago. The cannibalism of other leagues tv income has a lot g way to go and that’ll drive the price up alone
The Glazers bought us for less than £800m in 2005 and we're now worth (give or take) around £5b which is an absolutely phenomenal increase.How will the price/value raise? Super League is the only one that would ramp up its value. Or United sells its games on streaming direct.
State owners.
Pretty much every likely candidate would be from that part of the world, of course, but the problem with 'em isn't that they're "Arab".
If we somehow ended up being owned by the Norwegian oil fund, I'd be against that too.
Okay. Is it like an NHS thing then for you? Where you are just against governments?
The Glazers bought us for less than £800m in 2005 and we're now worth (give or take) around £5b which is an absolutely phenomenal increase.
No super League required there.
I'd expect new owners (particularly if ME) to significantly grow our match day, broadcast, commercial revenues and invest in a old Trafford refurb or new stadium build.
We're a bohemoth world wide that beyond the rake of sponsorship deals we've signed is still relatively untapped.
But they don’t have huge money because it’s being funnelled to the EPL and it isn’t finished yet. I remember when Qatar offered Glazers 1.5b in 2011 and we were told that was too good to turn down, the value had reached its peak. Well it’s ballooned in value since then without a super league so I can’t see why it’s a super league to increase value or bust.The other leagues don't really have huge TV money (for domestic or even their foreign markets) compared to the PL. My guess will be direct to supporters TV streams and/or the super league. Someone like Ratcliffe will buy United and spend 5-6 billion quid hoping for those two possibilities in 10-15 years' time. That's a helluva gamble.
Logically, when it's up in the 5-6 billion quid range it will be some ME/sport washing endeavour. Its just too big a risk financially to spend that much on United.
City sell their shares to themselves via 3rd party companies to inflate their value and income.City's owners run the club as a business for example, they have sold shares repeatedly throughout their tenure as majority owners, in order to make money!
They way they have done that is by becoming successful (how they did that is another matter), but they grew the club into what it is now with the pretence of making money.
Every football club is a business, it's how that business is run which is the kicker.
There was never going to be a queue of buyers. It’s the Mount Everest of sport acquisitions, air is thin up there
EXCLUSIVE Sir Jim Ratcliffe vicino all'acquisto del #ManchesterUnited dai Glazer per 4 miliardi di sterline circa. È l'uomo più ricco del Regno Unito, numero uno di INEOS e proprietario del Nizza #MUFC @TuttoMercatoWebWhat does it even say?
Google TranslateWhat does it even say?
What does it even say?
Google Translate
"Sir Jim Ratcliffe close to buying #ManchesterUnited from the Glazers for around £4bn. He is the richest man in the UK, number one at INEOS and owner of Nice"
ThanksI cleaned it up because certain phrases in Italian would look stupid when translated in English.
Sir Jim Ratcliffe is closing in for Manchester United. He's buying the club for around 4B sterling. Ratcliffe is the richest man in the UK he's the owner of INEOS and he's the owner of Nice.
I cleaned it up because certain phrases in Italian would look stupid when translated in English.
Sir Jim Ratcliffe is closing in for Manchester United. He's buying the club for around 4B sterling. Ratcliffe is the richest man in the UK he's the owner of INEOS and he's the owner of Nice.
Sounds more like some no-mark making shit up in the hope of getting clicks.Sounds like a leak to drive up prices ie auction
No one is doing things quick and discreet to try and beat the competition, or if they are, they're wasting their time. The Glazers have set up an auction to get the most money, that's their only criteria. So if SJR comes in with a good deal, they'll just take it to Dubai and ask them to beat it. They aren't going to jump on SJR's offer like there aren't anymore coming in.Unlikely news from Italy.
Italian journalists have the scoop on the sale of a british club being brokered in the US by a british billionaire.
Unlikely indeed.
Also I wouldnt say that its completely out of the question their interest was very public and SJR would want to avoid any gazumping by wealthy individuals from the middle east. ALSO its rumoured our new sponsor is close, INEOS?
Make it happen.
Not quite true, Chinese investors own 13% of City, whilst it's true that some of the investors have a Mansour buddy on the board, most are independent.City sell their shares to themselves via 3rd party companies to inflate their value and income.
Failing sporting ventures
I’d love to know how he’s so wealthy in that case.
Huge failure
On the sporting level they are all failing. Don't give two shits about how his business runs.
Sounds like a leak to drive up prices ie auction
A billionaire's never going to seek your approval after spending 5-6 billion quid. He will tell you some PR-driven plan/spin to keep you off his back.
If he invests the 5-6billion, it will buy up the debt i would imagine.
Wouldn’t be the end of the world that, would it? We’re punching above our weight already on the verge of a title challenge. We also have one foot in a cup final and a good chance of going deep in 2 other cups. If that plays out every season from here on in and we don’t have to be a vehicle for sportswashing I’d be one very happy fan.
Not quite true, Chinese investors own 13% of City, whilst it's true that some of the investors have a Mansour buddy on the board, most are independent.
If Mansour wants money he sells a stake in a club he owns.
They run the club for profit now, as the club is self sufficient, largely down to financial doping to get to this point of course, but the point remains Mansour makes money from City and they are run as part of the CFG business model.
Again, it's not sponsorship, it's the stakes they sell to investors that makes them the money.They're run for profit?
Is that if you pretend their sponsorships are real deals and not just their own money with a state-owned company's sticker on it?
They are his businesses.
tutto mercato are the equivalent of tribal football
How much have Girona won since their change of ownership?As long as we're successful both on and off the pitch, that is fine.
But with the resources that SJR has, I'd expect more success with his football clubs.
Explain to me how Nice are failing?
Ok you are deliberately acting like a child now. His investments are underwhelming from a sporting perspective which is the only one I care about for Manchester United. We've been handled like a pure business for long enough now. Everything involving Ratcliffe screams red flag. Don't want him anywhere near our club.
Again, it's not sponsorship, it's the stakes they sell to investors that makes them the money.
The dodgy sponsorship is for the clubs coiffeurs, if Mansour wants cash he sells a stake in one of his many clubs.