laughtersassassin
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2014
- Messages
- 11,870
Mike Keegan also saying the same as the times!
You are deluded. And one day you will regret your words as the incompetence continues
What is the point in buying 25% in MUFC?
Class A shares don't pay dividends, so no value there.
The club won't sell 100% any time soon as even Qatar cant get a deal done, so no return on investment for 25%.
Clearly Ineos's first step to full control. Remember, The Glazers increased their stake in MUFC incrementally. And that was at a time when the ownership structure was far simpler.
SJR autocorrects to this.. the caf mods have tuned rawkish..Sir James Arthur Ratcliffe FIChemE outbidding Qatar.. hahah.. this is hilarious.
Prepare yourself for another 10 years of Arnold like incompetent corporate men in charge, winning the occasional Carling Cup and fighting for top 4.
Mike Keegan also saying the same as the times!
Mike Keegan also saying the same as the times!
Jim isn’t putting up any money. INEOS are and their goal will be the exact same as the Glazers.
Let's fecking hope so and let's hope it won't take another decade
Bring Dave Brailsford and his dodgy drugs. At least the team will have more energy.Ratcliffe will be dead long before any plan to acquire 100% of the club comes to fruition.
And we know his track record of hiring utterly incompetent people for these projects anyway.
Arnold like? Glazers are staying as owners. So not Arnold like. Arnold is here to stay. Along with Murtough.Prepare yourself for another 10 years of Arnold like incompetent corporate men in charge, winning the occasional Carling Cup and fighting for top 4.
Don't get me wrong I'm gutted, but I do think there would be an element of short term gratifcation and long term regret if we ended up been owned by Qatar,.
I mean just look at how much contempt and lack of respect anyone shows for City, and soon to be Newcastle, whether we generate the money fairly or not we'd always be doing mental gymnastics to jusfiy ourselves.
This club is absolutely unequivocally fecked.
kinda ironic.Soul destroying.
So are the Glazers and Sir Jim going to walk onto the pitch before a game, hand in hand to get the adulation from the crowd.Wanting to co-own the club with the glazers is a red flag unto itself. Not even as a temporary arrangement. You know how they got the club to this point, you know it's problematic to provide liquid funds for their awful wealth draining management. It needs to be full sale or we might as well just wait for the glazers to hit rock rock bottom in another year.
Could it be the Sheikh playing games and he'll come back in?
It really wasn't, we as a club have outspent most.
Our problem is we haven't spent wisely or properly... we need sound people in charge to compete not some sugar daddy.
It's incredibly obvious that it's just a gradual takeover. Which is fine. Better than no takeover. This is very good news.
Prepare yourself for another 10 years of Arnold like incompetent corporate men in charge, winning the occasional Carling Cup and fighting for top 4.
By the time Ratcliff gets full control in the next 3-5 years, he will be nearly 80 years old! WTH are we going to see change?
Definitely not in our lifetime.By the time Ratcliff gets full control in the next 3-5 years, he will be nearly 80 years old! WTH are we going to see change?
Didn't somebody say he invested after they were successful. Not sure they are succesful now.How? His cycling and F1 teams have been hugely successful?