Rightnr
Wants players fined for winning away.
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2015
- Messages
- 14,768
Did you get confused with the Ligue Un thread?Just seen Nice are second in Ligue Un- ahead of PSG.
And who was top before the matchday?
Did you get confused with the Ligue Un thread?Just seen Nice are second in Ligue Un- ahead of PSG.
Just seen Nice are second in Ligue Un- ahead of PSG.
More likely is that Uefa change their competitions into something resembling more of this structure. The new 36 team format next season is the start of a transformation into the idea of more of the top teams playing each other in a league format. The problem for the Glazers is that 5 teams may well qualify for this new format going forward but United under Glazer ownership would still be a yo yo club 3rd-5th one season 6th-9th the season after.
I keep hearing they are waiting for the FIFA world club cup, we’ll they are not qualifying for that either as they are not wining the CL this year and they will not win the PL or generate enough ranking points.
So what are they waiting for, next summer they will have to invest £30m of their money or Jimmy Rats money, otherwise they won’t be able to make any transfers.
Did you get confused with the Ligue Un thread?
You are aware that PSG is owned by a completely different group of people than those bidding for Utd, right…?
Or are you seriously suggesting that because one group of Qataris are running PSG, you assume Utd will be run in the exact same way, with the exact same outcomes…?
Cuz that would be a comically xenophobic rationale to be guided by.
Interesting. God forbid we emulate PSG though, that is not what we should aspire for as a club post-Glazer.Just seen Nice are second in Ligue Un- ahead of PSG.
We’d become even more of a laughing stock and hated than we are now.Interesting. God forbid we emulate PSG though, that is not what we should aspire for as a club post-Glazer.
You didn't answer either question but keep playing the WUM. Everyone sees through your bullshit act.You’ve made over 20 posts in this thread prior to this post talking about Nice being shit.
Couldn't agree more.We’d become even more of a laughing stock and hated than we are now.
It’s one thing rivals understand the Glazers a terrible owners but failing with a literal country backing you is as embarrassing as it gets surely.
Disagree completely. Liverpool did great for years and have far less power than we do in the game financially so had to gamble more with players which ran out eventually.Qataris are our only salvation, hope. Faustian deal with Mephistopheles(The Devil himself) as I like to call it. Red Devils will have to sell their soul to the Devil in order to be a formidable force in football they once were. There is no other way. Quite ironic, isn't it?
But I have a feeling Joel and Avram will push the Ratcliffe deal through(annoy the Qataris enough in the process). They want to stay as leeches at any cost, it looks like. It's almost look like a pathology/sadism, they just so enjoy destroying(doing what's wrong for) United, it's more than money, maybe.
PSG is the perfect example of what happens when the sheikhs get bored of their project. They are a shambles now.Just seen Nice are second in Ligue Un- ahead of PSG.
You didn't answer either question but keep playing the WUM. Everyone sees through your bullshit act.
I am not aware of that and I am not at all aware that thinking it’s a state bid for the club makes you comically xenophobic.
Isn't Beckham Qatar ambassador for awhile now?
Wouldn't read much into it
It’s one thing rivals understand the Glazers a terrible owners but failing with a literal country backing you is as embarrassing as it gets surely.
To echo the above, it would be textbook market abuse if the Glazers flippantly floated the idea of a sale in an attempt to raise share prices. The SEC would have a field day.
PSG is the perfect example of what happens when the sheikhs get bored of their project. They are a shambles now.
You are aware that PSG is owned by a completely different group of people than those bidding for Utd, right…?
Or are you seriously suggesting that because one group of Qataris are running PSG, you assume Utd will be run in the exact same way, with the exact same outcomes…?
Cuz that would be a comically xenophobic rationale to be guided by.
PSG is owned by Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, the Emir of Qatar, via QSI. United are being bid for by Jassim bin Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani, his brother, who abdicated his position as heir for Tamim to become Emir.
Completely different group of people! Massive xenophobia!
You sure about that?
I mean, as sure as I can be from copying very long royal names from Wikipedia articles.
Which bit is wrong?
Me watching Round 673 of the Anti-Qatari vs Pro-Qatari "debate" with the exact same talking points from 8 months ago
PSG is owned by Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, the Emir of Qatar, via QSI. United are being bid for by Jassim bin Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani, his brother, who abdicated his position as heir for Tamim to become Emir.
Completely different group of people! Massive xenophobia!
I think you have got your Sheikh Jassims all mixed up, bud.
However, the one who is supposedly bidding for United is a member of the country's royal family and has a job in a state-backed institution QIB.
What happened mate? I’m out of the loop.Hopefully he is right about that
They were referencing the comments made by David Beckham yesterday alluding to the Qatari bid.What happened mate? I’m out of the loop.
Sounds to me like he's gonna be part of it if Jassim takes over
More likely is that Uefa change their competitions into something resembling more of this structure. The new 36 team format next season is the start of a transformation into the idea of more of the top teams playing each other in a league format. The problem for the Glazers is that 5 teams may well qualify for this new format going forward but United under Glazer ownership would still be a yo yo club 3rd-5th one season 6th-9th the season after.
I keep hearing they are waiting for the FIFA world club cup, we’ll they are not qualifying for that either as they are not wining the CL this year and they will not win the PL or generate enough ranking points.
So what are they waiting for, next summer they will have to invest £30m of their money or Jimmy Rats money, otherwise they won’t be able to make any transfers.
I see! Hate it when when that happens. Thanks for the heads up.
Apologies then @Rhyme Animal, but I still don't see how you can have a member of the same royal family as the PSG owners, and who have been reported using Al-Khelaifi to mediate part of the process as a completely separate entity.
Thank you, was that at the F1?They were referencing the comments made by David Beckham yesterday alluding to the Qatari bid.
Sounds to me like he's gonna be part of it if Jassim takes over
I think those other posters were reading into Beckham's comments as an indication the bid is still alive and well.Thank you, was that at the F1?
It’s kind of a nothing burger, no? Becks just saying we need better owners? What am I missing here?
tbf I'd get bored if I owned a football club in France too. Woo PSG won League 1, who fecking cares...PSG is the perfect example of what happens when the sheikhs get bored of their project. They are a shambles now.
how many Al Thani family members are there that are ‘connected to the Royal line’…
Hint - it’s a 3 figure number.
Could be three hundred million but it's by the by. The proqatar lads think it's Jassim.
So, that is just one member of the ruling qatari family.
The (real) Jassim is a state actor. Not racist to point out these facts.
Furthermore i have never liked Beckham. Fake. Always prwferred Nicky Butt.
It’s unquestionably xenophobic to suggest that the same individuals running PSG are the same ones bidding for Utd.
Its not ignorant at all. You labeled them as one entity because they belong to the same family of probably thousands of individuals.Not really. I'd agree it's a bit ignorant but not at all xenophobic.
As you alluded to, the ruling Qatari family is rather vast and the confused parties are both frequently referred to as Sheikh Jassim. Seems an honest mistake which the poster was fit to retract.
One of the anti-Qatar bunch was on hand to clear up the confusion. The notion it's a state bid has not been in anyway debunked, either.
Think there's a tendency in the pro-camp to 'call out' naysayers as being 'xenophobic' and 'racist' when there is this type of error, and to ise it as 'proof' of their argument, but most of the time it is just an innocent mistake and nothing more.
theres a tendency in the anti-camp to label everything related to state bid,
why your Jimmy boy is neve
there’s enough hypocrisy to go around, I’ll wait for you to acknowledge yours.