Club Sale | It’s done!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well he seems awfully keen to get into bed with them for starters.

And explain to me how you could expect our fortunes to change with him as owner? Because I've not read anything promising from his camp regarding debt clearing or investing infrastructure. Just some brexit-esque slogans like 'putting Manchester back into United'. Nice's fans don't seem particularly keen with him either.
None of that is relevant to the takeover process though. Qatar made all those promises and - shocker - the Glazers didn't give a shit because it doesn't matter to them.
 
If the reports are true about there being call and put options with the Ineos bid then from a financial point of view the Glazers would be correct in accepting the ineos bid. Regardless of what rise in value the club has over the next 3 years, the glazers will be able to force the sale of their shares at a pre-agreed price and likewise SJR can enforce a buy.

This ignores the opportunity cost of having the money today rather than in 3 years. You can stick the money in an investment fund and make 8-10% annually. So even if the money in 3 years is a bit higher, its still not a better offer
 
Disappointed Qatar obviously don’t feel like they need to own the biggest football club in the world. That would be such a win for them I don’t understand the lack of desire to get the deal done.
It's the bidding game. If they appear too desperate then they will be taken for a ride.
 
The way it was explained to me, Ratcliffe has offered more money to the Glazers. The payout scheme or the timetable is completely irrelevant to them as long as they get their money. If Jassim wanted the club so much, he should have offered more than Ratcliffe. Ratcliffe simple gave the Glazers the better offer. That's the long and short of it. Whether it's best for the club or not ultimately doesn't matter.

This latest bid by the Qatari is their way to save face. I think the deadline put forward is not coincidental. I imagine Ratcliffe wants the announcement done this weekend, as a way to shit on City's treble parade, and Qatar are getting ahead of it.
I dont think thats going to have the desired effect hes (Rat) hoping it will.
 
If you still want the Qatari's in after watching their bidding process you need your head shaking.
 
None of that is relevant to the takeover process though. Qatar made all those promises and - shocker - the Glazers didn't give a shit because it doesn't matter to them.
Be that as it may, I still don't see where INEOS are going to secure the capital to make those investments. They're already having to compromise with the takeover bid by keeping the Glazers in a minority capacity, I just don't see how from that position they're going to secure the finance needed to clear the debt, and build a stadium and continue to invest in the team.
 
I think the issue is SJ clearly wants the club, but his father (and likely premier financier) has gone on the record in saying he doesn't like football clubs as an investment. Hence why he's not just been able to blow Brexit Jimbo out the park with a much bigger offer.
The problem is he was equally able to do the same negotiation as Ratcliffe, but did not have the business sense to do it. It's a multi billion pound deal. You don't need to do it in one go. We would all love for it to be sorted out asap. But being realistic, it's a long term ownership plan, if it takes some time to take full ownership but you get control now, that's still a win. Ratcliffe understood that. Qatar did not.
 
Why are we removing the debt for SJ's offer? Surely he pays off the Glazers that amount and pays off the debt in a separate proposal completely, why would the debt removal be included in any proposal offer? Surely that's something he plans to do once he owns the club...

Talk of the devils said Ineos won't clear the debt
 
Reckon that will be that. Glazers have done what they are best at, squeezing the lemon until there’s nothing left and taking the cash.


This is why I'm not fearful of Ratcliffe not pumping in a tonne of investment and/or clearing the debt, If there was even a whiff of a chance to make another dollar off this club without putting any money in the Glazers wouldn't be selling.

Who ever takes over can't take over just to milk us dry like the Glazers did because there is nothing left to give.

Both prospected buyers know the Club needs major investment every where to compete at the top with the ever increasing competition in this league and they wouldn't waste their time bidding if they weren't prepared to do it.
 
Even if Sheikh’s bid was higher valuation than Ineos, it would be true Glazer arrogance to still reject it just because they didn’t like the fact he gave them a deadline.

See, you even get it yourself. It crossed my mind as well. Like when they got offended that the Qatari statement threw shade on their period of ownership of the club.

The Glazers are scum. Petty, greedy, selfish, and dishonorable of the absolute highest order. The Qatari have continuously made the mistake of thinking they are dealing with shrewd and sensible businessmen. That they would accept a far easier option for slightly less money, and bow out of the club. Well, they were wrong.
 
If this is true, I don't see what everyone is shouting at Qatar for.

They're offering full buy-out at a slight discount. It's literally 5% but you get to walk away with all the money and invest in something that might deliver 10% in one year.

The Glazers are just clueless pricks.

Yeah, payment up front would definitely be taken into consideration by the Glaziers as it gives them returns on whatever they invest it in. It's also got a negative tax-wise though so they'd have to run the numbers on it.
 
As much as I don't want the Glazers staying on in any capacity, it's a surprise how unimpressive Qatar have been.
I'd say it's the Glazers causing the problems, they're the ones that set deadlines then never made a decision. I think whatever bids came in they would of dragged it on as long as possible to make more money
 
People think Sir Jim is being used to up the Qatari bid, I honestly feel that it is the other way around. The Glazers always wanted to stay, and wanted investment to cash out in the future with even higher returns. Jim knows this and went ahead and gave them everything they wanted.

If that was the case they'd have accepted Jim's offer weeks ago
 
I’m not sure why people are removing debt from the Qatar offer. The offer is to buy Glazers out of the club. The club owns the debt sadly, not the Glazers.

Something that is a bit odd though is this $1bn investment on top. Why would they put that in their offer? It’s essentially saying to the Glazers “We have an additional $1bn but you can’t have it”. Any worthwhile negotiator is going to look at that additional $1bn the Qataris have and think “So you have more money, how about you add it to the offer instead?”
 
What a bunch of cope. Do you also think that the Glazers were smart and clever by finding a way to leverage a buyout back when they first took over? Financing the sale of the club was a brilliant move by them, they were real pros in getting the asset they wanted for very little up front.

If anyone’s being amateurish it’s the fecking Glazers here, who have ran a process that could have been wrapped up in April at the latest, well into June because the stupid siblings can’t make a decision.
Sure the Glazers have been a joke. You still have to know how to negotiate to buy the business from them. It was a hugely competitive bidding process. Qatar was very well capable of doing what Ratcliffe has. Does it matter in the grand scheme if they have full ownership now vs in 2 years? Not in the slightest. Qatar have just lost the bidding process by not being good negotiators, that's all there is. Glazers own the club as much as we hate it, they get to decide if some want to remain as minority holders.
 
Ratcliffe could be playing this clever as well. He can manipulate the share price of the public stake by stopping dividends until he buys out the Glazier shares at their fixed priced in a few years. That would make the buyout of 100% at the end a lot cheaper for him if he wants to do that.
I think the remainder would be strucuted via call options so the price per share is fixed for Glazers in advance if he wants to buy the whole club.
 
So, not only do we get Glazers 2.0 we actually keep Glazers 1.0 as well. I don't understand how anyone can think this is anything but a total unmitigated disaster and a worst case scenario. Ratcliffe has promised us absolutely nothing about what he's going to do, absolutely nothing. I don't think there's any reason to believe the club will be run even slightly differently to how it is being done now. I'm half expecting him to give Avram and Joel advisory roles.
 
Nobody really knows anything about the behind the scenes of these bids, it's tedious as feck reading about how one or the other is "amateur".
 
The Qatari bid hasn't exactly come off looking very professional here. And I imagine the optics are important for them. Expecting some damage control, Glazer bashing PR if they don't succeed.
 
If that was the case they'd have accepted Jim's offer weeks ago
They've been directly negotiating on finer details for weeks while Qatar has been left behind still trying to get back to the table. Getting a deal this big done takes time. Yes it's taking too long, but they are clearly progressing with Ratcliffe.
 
If this is true, I don't see what everyone is shouting at Qatar for.

They're offering full buy-out at a slight discount. It's literally 5% but you get to walk away with all the money and invest in something that might deliver 10% in one year.

The Glazers are just clueless pricks.

It's a strong bid. The only issue with the Qatari bid from the start until now is the obsession with immediate 100% ownership. It's principled but just tying their own hands behind their backs.

But people just hear Rat has valued the club higher without clocking his offer is a measly $3bn for 50.1% with no mention of debt repayment. Not a strong bid at all, it's a 'bend over for the Glazers' bid.
 
Nobody really knows anything about the behind the scenes of these bids, it's tedious as feck reading about how one or the other is "amateur".

Yeah this is true. Posters saying if you've watched the qataris bidding and still want them in you're crazy. Ignoring that none of us have watched them bidding, we're just getting reports from journos that have been consistently wrong
 
Newcastle cost 300m, not 6B+ though

Very different. Ashley was also 100% trying to get out
Exactly. City cost next to nothing as did Newcastle compared to us. The Glazers have run us into the ground and neglected the infrastructure. Whoever buys us is basically buying the history and fanbase. The winner has a big job on their hands and the perpetrators hovering about like a swarm of flies round sh*t in the background.
 
I think the remainder would be strucuted via call options so the price per share is fixed for Glazers in advance if he wants to buy the whole club.

That's only for the Glazier shares (including the public ones they own I assume). They can't discuss selling the other public ones yet which is where they could run the final price down by not paying dividends.
 
That's only for the Glazier shares (including the public ones they own I assume). They can't discuss selling the other public ones yet which is where they could run the final price down by not paying dividends.
Those shares (assuming you refer to class B) can be converted into normal shares. In fact they need to be converted before the takeover because they have 10x more voting rights.
 
I’m not sure why people are removing debt from the Qatar offer. The offer is to buy Glazers out of the club. The club owns the debt sadly, not the Glazers.

Something that is a bit odd though is this $1bn investment on top. Why would they put that in their offer? It’s essentially saying to the Glazers “We have an additional $1bn but you can’t have it”. Any worthwhile negotiator is going to look at that additional $1bn the Qataris have and think “So you have more money, how about you add it to the offer instead?”
And maybe Ratcliffe thought this through from the beginning and therefore hasn’t provided any figures regarding infrastructure investment.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.