red thru&thru
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2004
- Messages
- 7,657
Deeply concerning...
Concerning? Why?
Deeply concerning...
You can't guarantee shit mate.
Thanks, makes more sense that way, still reckon we are being over valued here considering the baggage we come with.
Looking into itDeeply concerning...
Wow, first to indicate the valuation is similar.
Wow, first to indicate the valuation is similar.
Don't leave this out.
Can’t compete at this table. He’s trying to snake his way in with bullshit tactics.Ratcliffe will be back tomorrow
If he can't compete at the table he'll just chop off the legsCan’t compete at this table. He’s trying to snake his way in with bullshit tactics.
Once again contradicting himself.
Don't leave this out.
Deeply concerning...
Not a scooby do and he’s shown it time and time again yet people seem to lap it up. He’s a charlatan.Is it on top of or is it inclusive? He hasn't got bloody clue has he?
Sounds like hes trying to get too clever with his wordplay to not sound the same as everyone elseThat's embarrassing reporting from Ben Jacobs.... He clearly doesn't have a clue what he's talking about
For who…? City, Newcastle and Liverpool fans? Or Utd fans who want to see the club thrive again?
In addition to Ratcliffe’s offer to buy the Glazers’ 69 per cent shareholding, the billionaire founder of the petrochemicals giant Ineos also made a proposal to take a 50.1 per cent share for around $3bn that would allow the Glazers to retain a minority stake for three years before being automatically forced out.
It's over Jim
For United fans that don't want Qatar, clearly. There are a number of us. As you well know and we don't need to cover old ground.
If he can't compete at the table he'll just chop off the legs
Going by the recent reports Ratcliffe is the favorite...Someone said that a hot favourite preferred bidder was leaked for Chelsea about a week before Raine suddenly chose Boehly. Hopefully they pulled the same trick with Ratcliffe
Not a scooby do and he’s shown it time and time again yet people seem to lap it up. He’s a charlatan.
He’s an astrologist.I read Ben Jacobs twitter thread and I still have no clue what is Qatar bid. Why can’t journalists write in simple English? Just tell us what the bid is without pledged investment for both and then compare which is bigger. Is that so hard?
It does but unfortunately the Glazers don't give a shit about pledged investment it's all about how much money they can makeThen that makes their offer very good if true.
I think this is it. Given the high base rates at the moment, cash in the bank makes you money.Is it not a choice between
Ill buy your motor now for £1000 cash upfront or
Give me it now and Ill give you £1200 in 2 years
Even if the Qatar bid is higher now I'm guessing the Glazers will be hoping if they keep 20% with the INEOS bid that will be worth more in the future so they'll make more money eventuallySo Ducker has said
$3 Billion dollars is £2.4 Billion
Ben Jacobs is saying Qatar are at £5.6 billion inclusive of investment (£800 million) which works out at £4.8 Billion for the club valuation. 69% of that is £3.31 Billion.
Even if the Qatar bid is higher now I'm guessing the Glazers will be hoping if they keep 20% with the INEOS bid that will be worth more in the future so they'll make more money eventually