Club Sale | It’s done!

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think that was probably the point of this phase to get them to drive their bid up but they obviously just aren’t interested or maybe haven’t budgeted for any more.

Based on what we’re hearing am expecting INEOS will emerge as preferred bidder next week, if /when they do I think they will start leaking more positive PR. There are a lot of negative assumptions about their bid which they’ll want to negate if they can.
True. But there's also nothing to say Qatar won't panic bid a better offer between now and then.
 
I think that was probably the point of this phase to get them to drive their bid up but they obviously just aren’t interested or maybe haven’t budgeted for any more.

Based on what we’re hearing am expecting INEOS will emerge as preferred bidder next week, if /when they do I think they will start leaking more positive PR. There are a lot of negative assumptions about their bid which they’ll want to negate if they can.

Yes they have to finally start talking about how they plan to clear debt,invest in stadium and training facilities,oh and feck off those leeches. Maybe then I can feel a bit more positive about the club’s future again
 
Yes they have to finally start talking about how they plan to clear debt,invest in stadium and training facilities,oh and feck off those leeches. Maybe then I can feel a bit more positive about the club’s future again

They will have to, part of the problem is there have been a lot of negative assumptions about the INEOS bid and lots of positive ones about the Qatari bid. The truth is going to be a lot more in the middle.

INEOS will pump money in one way or another, they’ll be big changes on how club is run. Whether that will be good or bad nobody knows but that’s same for any new owner.
 
The weird thing is that Jassim seem to have bid the same bid he has bid before.
 
This point is irrelevant because neither bid has met the Glazer’s long stated £6bn demand, with the Qatari bid (according to the latest reports) placing less value on the Glazer’s shareholding than the INEOS bid.

in addition to this long stated demand is the long rumoured reluctance that 2 of the Glazer siblings have towards selling the club. The INEOS bid simply contains flexibility in response to this. Either way it’s still for full control of the club - for the Glazer’s entire 69% shareholding or for 50%+1, allowing the 2 siblings who are reluctant to sell to retain a minority share.

Apparently the Qatari PR machine has mislead us all the way through the process they have always had the second largest bid where’s does this out the Qatari in supporters since money was and has always been their USP.
 
Shame the person selling gives absolutely zero fecks for the clubs future else Qatar would be in the door

50% owner buying the club on debt whilst the Glazers are still sat on the board. Fecking disgusting in all honesty.

I cant wait to see the sums of borrowed money required to buy the club and build/renovate OT
 
The real world. Especially if his bid is accepted for 51%. That’s only circa 3bn.
INEOS annual revenues are c.£50bn. SJR net worth is £13bn. His two business partners are worth about £6bn each.
They might not match Qatar state for wealth, but trust they have the money to back their bid.
This is exactly my point you have Tier 1 owners ; State Saudi, Abu Dhabi, Qatar etc then you have Tier 2 - Todd Boehly, SJR , Stan Kroneke with the caveat that SJR might have just outbid a state do maybe he’s Tier 1.5 like Abrahamovic as his company turnover is $60bn annually with net profit from €1-3bn
 
Shame the person selling gives absolutely zero fecks for the clubs future else Qatar would be in the door

50% owner buying the club on debt whilst the Glazers are still sat on the board. Fecking disgusting in all honesty.

I cant wait to see the sums of borrowed money required to buy the club and build/renovate OT
Ratcliff isn't buying the club on debt?
 
Shame the person selling gives absolutely zero fecks for the clubs future else Qatar would be in the door

50% owner buying the club on debt whilst the Glazers are still sat on the board. Fecking disgusting in all honesty.

I cant wait to see the sums of borrowed money required to buy the club and build/renovate OT

In that case then they should have bid more mate
 
This is exactly my point you have Tier 1 owners ; State Saudi, Abu Dhabi, Qatar etc then you have Tier 2 - Todd Boehly, SJR , Stan Kroneke with the caveat that SJR might have just outbid a state do maybe he’s Tier 1.5 like Abrahamovic as his company turnover is $60bn annually with net profit from €1-3bn

Qatar cannot be anywhere near tier 1 in this ranking system of yours based on how they've ran Málaga and PSG, unless it's all about wealth.
 
Apparently the Qatari PR machine has mislead us all the way through the process they have always had the second largest bid where’s does this out the Qatari in supporters since money was and has always been their USP.
I’ve no doubt that they have the actual money to outbid INEOS, but as they have repeatedly stated - they won’t bid recklessly to buy the club. If they did it would have significant knock on effects for future purchases, and that’s bad business.
 
Apparently the Qatari PR machine has mislead us all the way through the process they have always had the second largest bid where’s does this out the Qatari in supporters since money was and has always been their USP.
Yep. I only supported the Qatari bid as I thought they were minted and had limitless cash. If they are really a bunch of tight arses then I will suddenly become all moralistic and support SJ
 
Pardon me. Putin is white, I forgot. So difficult to raise the racism card then. Sort of.

You are in all seriousness equaling Ratcliffe to Al Thani, both being "business men", while you build your argument on some rubbish about racism and being anti Middel East - totally ignoring the fact that the Al Thani family have ruled Qatar since the late 19th century and been treating their countries resources as their own private property (yes, I know they were also a British protectorate for a long period). But for you he is just another business man?

And countries in the Middle East most be pretty anti Middle East themselves, btw, as Qatar in 2017 were blocked by Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Egypt, UAE and afterwards also Jordan + other countries such as Maldives, Mauritania, Djibouti, Senegal and Comoros. Why? Because of Qatar's close ties to Iran and their support of radical Islamist groups.

But hey, their are going to build us a new stadium.
Hahahahaha!! So now we are going into geopolitics! I am waiting for what’s the next set of bollocks to come out from you.
 
Yup, puke-worthy stuff. Will struggle to care about us since we've been consigned to mediocrity by the Glazers cnuts and the Brexit rat.
 
In that case then they should have bid more mate

Nah

Nobody on the planet was paying upwards of 6B for the club and then committing a further 1B to the stadium and paying off what 600m of debt. Jim has found a nice little loophole that seems him get 50% and the Glazers stay on, they're all buzzing with that deal aren't they meanwhile the club will suffer in the long term.
 
Nah

Nobody on the planet was paying upwards of 6B for the club and then committing a further 1B to the stadium and paying off what 600m of debt. Jim has found a nice little loophole that seems him get 50% and the Glazers stay on, they're all buzzing with that deal aren't they meanwhile the club will suffer in the long term.
A loophole? His bid just contains a compromise option that reflects the long rumoured reality that 2 of the Glazer siblings don’t want to sell.
 
Nah

Nobody on the planet was paying upwards of 6B for the club and then committing a further 1B to the stadium and paying off what 600m of debt. Jim has found a nice little loophole that seems him get 50% and the Glazers stay on, they're all buzzing with that deal aren't they meanwhile the club will suffer in the long term.

Then maybe he should have cut corners mate. Do we need to buy a new 1B stadium NOW? Do we need to pay off all the debt Now? The most important thing should have been to take the club off the Glazers hands
 
"Hello Raine Group, no we don't care if Jassim has offered $500 million more now, we are honorable businessmen and will stick to our self-imposed deadline. Tell Qatar to feck off"

They've known about Jim's bid all week. So why did they come in with a lesser offer?
 
The Qataris were always going to be at a disadvantage due to their insistence of wanting to buy the club 100% outright, whilst SJR was happy with a majority stake at any cost, even if it meant getting into bed with the Glazers and piling more debt onto the club.

SJR knows he cannot compete with the Qataris and so he will use every other method in the book, whether it is popular with the fans or not.
 
The Qataris were always going to be at a disadvantage due to their insistence of wanting to buy the club 100% outright, whilst SJR was happy with a majority stake at any cost, even if it meant getting into bed with the Glazers and piling more debt onto the club.

SJR knows he cannot compete with the Qataris and so he will use every other method in the book, whether it is popular with the fans or not.
Also, don’t forget that the presence of INEOS in the bidding process will have raised the Qatari bid to a level it wouldn’t have been if they’d had a solo run at it.
 
Then maybe he should have cut corners mate. Do we need to buy a new 1B stadium NOW? Do we need to pay off all the debt Now? The most important thing should have been to take the club off the Glazers hands

Yeah I do agree with that but he was trying to do the right thing I guess.
 
That would be decided by INEOS, unless there's some pre-agreement about the Glazers' dividends.

well they’re not going to stay just for the sake of it. The only thing they care about is making profit and taking money from United certainly not the football aspect.
 
A loophole? His bid just contains a compromise option that reflects the long rumoured reality that 2 of the Glazer siblings don’t want to sell.

Well yeah my initial post stated that it suits everybody but the club it seems

One guy is willing to pay for the club in full and clear the debt/build a stadium

One guy is buying 50% and keeping the Glazers on. The amount of debt that will be made to do this purchase is yet to be seen but I bet it's eye watering. And before we get the 'INEOS will pay the debt' Will they feck. Theres upwards of £600m of debt at the moment and he will borrow to purchase the club. It's not going to sink billions of debt on INEOS for a 50% stake in the club thats for sure
 
Then maybe he should have cut corners mate. Do we need to buy a new 1B stadium NOW? Do we need to pay off all the debt Now? The most important thing should have been to take the club off the Glazers hands
It's a state bid, they could have offered whatever they wanted but have chosen to offer less per share than another bidder. Those promises are worthless to the actual bid, it's like trying to buy a house for less than the asking price and less than another bidder but hoping that they'll accept it because you've promised that you will put a swimming pool in and an extension for yourself if you get it.
 
well they’re not going to stay just for the sake of it. The only thing they care about is making profit and taking money from United certainly not the football aspect.

If Joel and Avram stay, it will be because they think they can make way more from their shares in 5-10 years, than they would now...so "making profit", as you said. There's a world where I can see them sacrificing or significantly lowering their dividends in the case of an INEOS takeover.
 
Are people forgetting SIR Jim won't even be clearing any of the 1 billion debt? We'll be more or less in the same position as we were with the glazers in charge
 
If Joel and Avram stay, it will be because they think they can make way more from their shares in 5-10 years, than they would now...so "making profit", as you said. There's a world where I can see them sacrificing or significantly lowering their dividends in the case of an INEOS takeover.
This. The dividends are a drop in the bucket compared to the value growth they're expecting. I don't expect dividend policy to be an issue at stake.
 
This. The dividends are a drop in the bucket compared to the value growth they're expecting. I don't expect dividend policy to be an issue at stake.

Also forgot to mention that if we choose to believe Duncan Castles, the Glazers can sell their shares at a premium in 2024 or 2025, so they could be gone relatively quickly too.
 
It's a state bid, they could have offered whatever they wanted but have chosen to offer less per share than another bidder. Those promises are worthless to the actual bid, it's like trying to buy a house for less than the asking price and less than another bidder but hoping that they'll accept it because you've promised that you will put a swimming pool in and an extension for yourself if you get it.

I agree. Which makes you wonder why they did that. I think that we can all agree that Qatar has money
 
It's a state bid, they could have offered whatever they wanted but have chosen to offer less per share than another bidder. Those promises are worthless to the actual bid, it's like trying to buy a house for less than the asking price and less than another bidder but hoping that they'll accept it because you've promised that you will put a swimming pool in and an extension for yourself if you get it.


But what was they supposed to do? they could have put together a half assed bid like Jim but they want the club to be a success. They could turn round this afternoon and say ok we're buying the club but will keep the debt and that would be pointless for all involved

Feck the debt, feck the stadium but we'll buy the club? who on earth is going to lay down 5-6B in those conditions it's absurd
 
:nono: This is wrong. Assuming Jassim has bid 5bn then that is the valuation he places on the whole club, the Glazers only get 69% of that which is roughly 3.4bn between them. The debt and infrastructure investment may well be on top, but those figures are largely irrelevant to the Glazers and probably won’t affect their decision.

This is what has been reported by sports journalists whereas Bloomberg have said it all goes to the Glazer’s, it’s only the Glazer’s shares that are for sale which is 69% and which is being bid for.

It was reported months ago that the plan was to buy the other 31% afterwards, if they valued the club at £5 billion then they’d bid 69% of £5 billion to purchase the Glazer’s shares of the club and we’d be hearing of £3.5 billion being the bid.

This whole 100% of the club is simply meaning that they want to buy the whole club but they can’t buy more than 69% when the Glazer’s don’t own 100% of the club therefore can’t sell 100% of the club.
 
Also forgot to mention that if we choose to believe Duncan Castles, the Glazers can sell their shares at a premium in 2024 or 2025, so they could be gone relatively quickly too.
Interesting. Gives them the option of a lucrative exit even if the growth pathways they believe in don't end up panning out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.