Plant0x84
Shame we’re aren’t more like Brighton
Pleasure doing business.well since you asked so nicely.
Pleasure doing business.well since you asked so nicely.
Do you think the 92 foundation will be the ones to buy Liverpool?
True. But there's also nothing to say Qatar won't panic bid a better offer between now and then.I think that was probably the point of this phase to get them to drive their bid up but they obviously just aren’t interested or maybe haven’t budgeted for any more.
Based on what we’re hearing am expecting INEOS will emerge as preferred bidder next week, if /when they do I think they will start leaking more positive PR. There are a lot of negative assumptions about their bid which they’ll want to negate if they can.
I think that was probably the point of this phase to get them to drive their bid up but they obviously just aren’t interested or maybe haven’t budgeted for any more.
Based on what we’re hearing am expecting INEOS will emerge as preferred bidder next week, if /when they do I think they will start leaking more positive PR. There are a lot of negative assumptions about their bid which they’ll want to negate if they can.
Yes they have to finally start talking about how they plan to clear debt,invest in stadium and training facilities,oh and feck off those leeches. Maybe then I can feel a bit more positive about the club’s future again
This point is irrelevant because neither bid has met the Glazer’s long stated £6bn demand, with the Qatari bid (according to the latest reports) placing less value on the Glazer’s shareholding than the INEOS bid.
in addition to this long stated demand is the long rumoured reluctance that 2 of the Glazer siblings have towards selling the club. The INEOS bid simply contains flexibility in response to this. Either way it’s still for full control of the club - for the Glazer’s entire 69% shareholding or for 50%+1, allowing the 2 siblings who are reluctant to sell to retain a minority share.
This is exactly my point you have Tier 1 owners ; State Saudi, Abu Dhabi, Qatar etc then you have Tier 2 - Todd Boehly, SJR , Stan Kroneke with the caveat that SJR might have just outbid a state do maybe he’s Tier 1.5 like Abrahamovic as his company turnover is $60bn annually with net profit from €1-3bnThe real world. Especially if his bid is accepted for 51%. That’s only circa 3bn.
INEOS annual revenues are c.£50bn. SJR net worth is £13bn. His two business partners are worth about £6bn each.
They might not match Qatar state for wealth, but trust they have the money to back their bid.
Ratcliff isn't buying the club on debt?Shame the person selling gives absolutely zero fecks for the clubs future else Qatar would be in the door
50% owner buying the club on debt whilst the Glazers are still sat on the board. Fecking disgusting in all honesty.
I cant wait to see the sums of borrowed money required to buy the club and build/renovate OT
Shame the person selling gives absolutely zero fecks for the clubs future else Qatar would be in the door
50% owner buying the club on debt whilst the Glazers are still sat on the board. Fecking disgusting in all honesty.
I cant wait to see the sums of borrowed money required to buy the club and build/renovate OT
You tell him mate! I’m on your side (for once)Why are you actually here?
This is exactly my point you have Tier 1 owners ; State Saudi, Abu Dhabi, Qatar etc then you have Tier 2 - Todd Boehly, SJR , Stan Kroneke with the caveat that SJR might have just outbid a state do maybe he’s Tier 1.5 like Abrahamovic as his company turnover is $60bn annually with net profit from €1-3bn
I’ve no doubt that they have the actual money to outbid INEOS, but as they have repeatedly stated - they won’t bid recklessly to buy the club. If they did it would have significant knock on effects for future purchases, and that’s bad business.Apparently the Qatari PR machine has mislead us all the way through the process they have always had the second largest bid where’s does this out the Qatari in supporters since money was and has always been their USP.
Yep. I only supported the Qatari bid as I thought they were minted and had limitless cash. If they are really a bunch of tight arses then I will suddenly become all moralistic and support SJApparently the Qatari PR machine has mislead us all the way through the process they have always had the second largest bid where’s does this out the Qatari in supporters since money was and has always been their USP.
Hahahahaha!! So now we are going into geopolitics! I am waiting for what’s the next set of bollocks to come out from you.Pardon me. Putin is white, I forgot. So difficult to raise the racism card then. Sort of.
You are in all seriousness equaling Ratcliffe to Al Thani, both being "business men", while you build your argument on some rubbish about racism and being anti Middel East - totally ignoring the fact that the Al Thani family have ruled Qatar since the late 19th century and been treating their countries resources as their own private property (yes, I know they were also a British protectorate for a long period). But for you he is just another business man?
And countries in the Middle East most be pretty anti Middle East themselves, btw, as Qatar in 2017 were blocked by Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Egypt, UAE and afterwards also Jordan + other countries such as Maldives, Mauritania, Djibouti, Senegal and Comoros. Why? Because of Qatar's close ties to Iran and their support of radical Islamist groups.
But hey, their are going to build us a new stadium.
In that case then they should have bid more mate
Ratcliff isn't buying the club on debt?
A loophole? His bid just contains a compromise option that reflects the long rumoured reality that 2 of the Glazer siblings don’t want to sell.Nah
Nobody on the planet was paying upwards of 6B for the club and then committing a further 1B to the stadium and paying off what 600m of debt. Jim has found a nice little loophole that seems him get 50% and the Glazers stay on, they're all buzzing with that deal aren't they meanwhile the club will suffer in the long term.
Nah
Nobody on the planet was paying upwards of 6B for the club and then committing a further 1B to the stadium and paying off what 600m of debt. Jim has found a nice little loophole that seems him get 50% and the Glazers stay on, they're all buzzing with that deal aren't they meanwhile the club will suffer in the long term.
"Hello Raine Group, no we don't care if Jassim has offered $500 million more now, we are honorable businessmen and will stick to our self-imposed deadline. Tell Qatar to feck off"
We don't know the actual detail do we.They've known about Jim's bid all week. So why did they come in with a lesser offer?
They've known about Jim's bid all week. So why did they come in with a lesser offer?
They are going though so don't see your point? We all agree they have been terrible owners.
We will be getting a new stadium or redevelopment. It has to be done.
Also, don’t forget that the presence of INEOS in the bidding process will have raised the Qatari bid to a level it wouldn’t have been if they’d had a solo run at it.The Qataris were always going to be at a disadvantage due to their insistence of wanting to buy the club 100% outright, whilst SJR was happy with a majority stake at any cost, even if it meant getting into bed with the Glazers and piling more debt onto the club.
SJR knows he cannot compete with the Qataris and so he will use every other method in the book, whether it is popular with the fans or not.
They might be staying by the looks of things. Taking more money from uniteds profits.
Then maybe he should have cut corners mate. Do we need to buy a new 1B stadium NOW? Do we need to pay off all the debt Now? The most important thing should have been to take the club off the Glazers hands
That would be decided by INEOS, unless there's some pre-agreement about the Glazers' dividends.
A loophole? His bid just contains a compromise option that reflects the long rumoured reality that 2 of the Glazer siblings don’t want to sell.
It's a state bid, they could have offered whatever they wanted but have chosen to offer less per share than another bidder. Those promises are worthless to the actual bid, it's like trying to buy a house for less than the asking price and less than another bidder but hoping that they'll accept it because you've promised that you will put a swimming pool in and an extension for yourself if you get it.Then maybe he should have cut corners mate. Do we need to buy a new 1B stadium NOW? Do we need to pay off all the debt Now? The most important thing should have been to take the club off the Glazers hands
well they’re not going to stay just for the sake of it. The only thing they care about is making profit and taking money from United certainly not the football aspect.
This. The dividends are a drop in the bucket compared to the value growth they're expecting. I don't expect dividend policy to be an issue at stake.If Joel and Avram stay, it will be because they think they can make way more from their shares in 5-10 years, than they would now...so "making profit", as you said. There's a world where I can see them sacrificing or significantly lowering their dividends in the case of an INEOS takeover.
This. The dividends are a drop in the bucket compared to the value growth they're expecting. I don't expect dividend policy to be an issue at stake.
It's a state bid, they could have offered whatever they wanted but have chosen to offer less per share than another bidder. Those promises are worthless to the actual bid, it's like trying to buy a house for less than the asking price and less than another bidder but hoping that they'll accept it because you've promised that you will put a swimming pool in and an extension for yourself if you get it.
It's a state bid, they could have offered whatever they wanted but have chosen to offer less per share than another bidder. Those promises are worthless to the actual bid, it's like trying to buy a house for less than the asking price and less than another bidder but hoping that they'll accept it because you've promised that you will put a swimming pool in and an extension for yourself if you get it.
This is wrong. Assuming Jassim has bid 5bn then that is the valuation he places on the whole club, the Glazers only get 69% of that which is roughly 3.4bn between them. The debt and infrastructure investment may well be on top, but those figures are largely irrelevant to the Glazers and probably won’t affect their decision.
Interesting. Gives them the option of a lucrative exit even if the growth pathways they believe in don't end up panning out.Also forgot to mention that if we choose to believe Duncan Castles, the Glazers can sell their shares at a premium in 2024 or 2025, so they could be gone relatively quickly too.