Brownie85
Mes que un muppet!
I do love how many leaks are coming out when everyone is supposedly under NDA's... I know they do happen, but still. Everything is so conflicting
It's almost like they are guessing isn't itI do love how many leaks are coming out when everyone is supposedly under NDA's... I know they do happen, but still. Everything is so conflicting
And over half the British electorate were 'Brexiteers' back in 2016, and Qatar's entire wealth derives from fossil fuels.He’s still a Brexiteering Tory and INEOS are still a petrochemical company. I don’t think people are going to backtrack - most of us disassociate the owners from the club.
At least we'll be champions of the moral high groundSJR taking control would be a bad day for United. The fecking leechers would still be here and SJR doesn't have the cash to catapult us into the 21st century, so that means debt, debt and more debt to fund the OT & Carrington renovations.
Yes, they're all cnutsOver half the British electorate were 'Brexiteers' back in 2016, and Qatar's entire wealth derives from fossil fuels.
The Glazer family has 10 times the voting power. You'd need to own a lot of the club before you outmuscle themSheikh Jassim wants to buy the Glazer shares and the other shares too. Sir Jim apparently just wants the Glazer shares. Neither makes any difference in ownership. As long as you own 51% of the club that's enough and you have full control on anything.
Example: Sheikh Mansoor doesn't own 100% of Man city. He's sold off small chunks to the far East. I think it's about 30% now that he's sold off but he still owns the majority of the club and thus can still do what he likes.
So I think people getting twisted over 69% or 100% are wasting their time and breath. It really doesn't matter that much. It's still a takeover.
We absolutely don’t know that, nothing has been confirmed about how INEOS will fund their bid. It’s just presumed by doom mongers like yourself.
It would sort of be funny if Jassim has pump faked Ratcliffe into overspending by a billionIf jassim wasn't ready to significantly up the bid then he should have pulled out. That would have allowed SJR to lowball the rats and the money spared would have been invested in the club
If jassim wasn't ready to significantly up the bid then he should have pulled out. That would have allowed SJR to lowball the rats and the money spared would have been invested in the club
It's funny until you realise we're payingIt would sort of be funny if Jassim has pump faked Ratcliffe into overspending by a billion
Well yeah i'd say most of it is guesswork. Reminds me of the whole "SJR and SJ bids are in, confirmed" and then a few hours later, no confirmed bid and they've got an extension. Pure guesswork by the lot of themIt's almost like they are guessing isn't it
And? I’m pro Ratcliffe. It’s my favoured bid of the options. I’m not going to twerk for him though. He’s in all likelihood a colossal cnut. A cnut who owns a company doing shit tons of damage to the planet. However, because unlike some very noisy people in this thread I don’t believe a football club is defined by who owns it I can keep supporting the club whilst acknowledging its owner is a cnut. Just like I’ve done my entire life.And over half the British electorate were 'Brexiteers' back in 2016, and Qatar's entire wealth derives from fossil fuels.
Bring back the silly Finnish bloke!If only there was a 3rd bid, I'm not convinced by either Qatar or SJR.
I see people are taking the INEOS news well:
Well apparently Jassim doesn't have the cash to get us in the first place.SJR taking control would be a bad day for United. The fecking leechers would still be here and SJR doesn't have the cash to catapult us into the 21st century, so that means debt, debt and more debt to fund the OT & Carrington renovations.
I see people are taking the INEOS news well:
Fahk awffI heard the Glazers are bringing Kendall Roy in to get the best deal.
Glazers would reject and just take investment from Elliot insteadIf jassim wasn't ready to significantly up the bid then he should have pulled out. That would have allowed SJR to lowball the rats and the money spared would have been invested in the club
Amen.our online fanbase are numpties.
They are under investigation for fraud, they are no longer a factor in thisGlazers would reject and just take investment from Elliot instead
That was their 3rd and final take it or leave it bid. If it’s not good enough they are done here.I doubt Qatar will give up this easy
Met Brian Cox actually at a book signing few months ago. He said he was a United fan and mates with "Alex".Fahk awff
Where'd you hear that, Friendster?That was their 3rd and final take it or leave it bid. If it’s not good enough they are done here.
Good man.Met Brian Cox actually at a book signing few months ago. He said he was a United fan and mates with "Alex".
We’re signing Aaron Ramsey! (Or something, probably)What does this mean for our transfer window
Glazers would reject and just take investment from Elliot instead
Which one?We’re signing Aaron Ramsey! (Or something, probably)
Or Carlyle then. Raine could easily find investors looking to take a minority stakeThey are under investigation for fraud, they are no longer a factor in this
Carlyle and Qatar have very close links/business ties. Unlikely to go up against themOr Carlyle then. Raine could easily find investors looking to take a minority stake
Ownership matters though.And? I’m pro Ratcliffe. It’s my favoured bid of the options. I’m not going to twerk for him though. He’s in all likelihood a colossal cnut. A cnut who owns a company doing shit tons of damage to the planet. However, because unlike some very noisy people in this thread I don’t believe a football club is defined by who owns it I can keep supporting the club whilst acknowledging its owner is a cnut. Just like I’ve done my entire life.
I few thoughts
If you were Joel and Avram Glazer would you trust SJR as a business man and let him have some sorts of control of the majority of your wealth?
Just a quick google search tells you that this man has a history of lies, broken promises and shady business decisions. Not to mention his in political involvement. I’m 100% sure that the Glazers has done their due diligence on this man.
What would you prefer in todays unstable economical times? Cash on the table or a minority stake in a closed envelope locked in a complicated ownership without having any saying on key decisions?
The Glazer siblings are both 50 year+ and with that comes some sorts of financial maturity and for most of us an unwillingness to gamble with our wealth too much. The opportunity to cash in $1B to your own bank account in one single deal don’t come often.
From what I can understand all parties in this sale process is still restricted by a NDA. My bet is still that the NTF with SJ is the preferred buyer and I base that solely on my experience and common logical sense.