Yet the Glazers are still the majority owners of the club.
Do these people think before they spout this crap.
Club ownership | Senior management team talk
- Thread starter golden_blunder
- Start date
Yet the Glazers are still the majority owners of the club.
Do these people think before they spout this crap.
Use white text next time. Or come to realize we are only in this mess because of the Glazers
Hmmm… I take back the common sense thing. This is sensationalist nonsense and really stupid thing to say.
So people really think INEOS in 12 months have been worse than the Glazers whole tenure ?
Common sense is really lacking on here of late
Common sense is really lacking on here of late
What absolute drivel. He normally talks some sense. Any business that undergoes re structuring is going to have lower moral than normal due to uncertainty.
United needs restructuring. We all know it does. It has been very unsuccessful for a long time, things have to change.
United needs restructuring. We all know it does. It has been very unsuccessful for a long time, things have to change.
I'm not sure the staff would agree that Ineos has been any better than the Glazers. More to the club than just the football side. I don't think anyone means Ineos has been worse on footballing matters (so far)
Without Ineos propping them up, the glazers were in a financial position where they would have to sell the club.
Ineos gave them an out, and ensured they could keep owning the business, and then pulled their own level of shitehousing on top.
Ineos have been crap so far. But saying they are making the Glazers look good is a nonsense. Even after a good performance and result we just get pilloried for a week in the media.
It's funny how these 'experts' never bother to explain why all the cuts are happening at the club.
Why are they happening?
It's simple, the Glazers ran the club into the ground.
The christmas party is cancelled because "the Glazers ran the club into the ground"? You'll have to do better than that.
In the context of the whole clip what he says makes sense though. The morale at the club within the staff is at a lowpoint far lower than has been the case at any point during the glazers solo reign. We all agree Glazers ran us in to the ground. But Ineos really do seem to misunderstand United and its core values completely. The idiotic Fulham comments speak to that point.
If the Glazers had never happened, Ineos would have never had the money to buy the club so it is all glazers fault in the end.
It's not so black and white, the Glazers spent badly, appointed badly and ran the club badly. Ratcliffe is also not a nice guy and is running the club as he would any other newly acquired business, streamlining, making cuts and leveraging cash wherever he can. Mass redundancies, cancelled perks and raised ticket prices are all part of this. It must be galling for staff to lose jobs and for fans forced to pay more while millions are paid out to ETH for an extended contract.