Ecstatic
Cutie patootie!
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2015
- Messages
- 13,787
- Supports
- PsG
@A-man
I agree with you. That said, there is no frustration amongst PSG fans who are "proud" (I don't like this term) of its history. After all, we're talking about a club established in 1970!
I've read that his brother had considered PSG as the best springboard to join Barcelona later. So, it seems that the initial plan was 1) PSG 2) Barcelona.
The underlying rationale is sample: "A lot of Brazilian players were successful there so it's a good place to discover the European football".
Sure, suffice to look at Chelsea that did need 10 years to win a Champions League and City at the European stage in the last seasons.
I agree with you. That said, there is no frustration amongst PSG fans who are "proud" (I don't like this term) of its history. After all, we're talking about a club established in 1970!
I think the beautiful city of paris might have been a bigger influence on the decisions. because competing for important trophies certainly wasn't.
I've read that his brother had considered PSG as the best springboard to join Barcelona later. So, it seems that the initial plan was 1) PSG 2) Barcelona.
The underlying rationale is sample: "A lot of Brazilian players were successful there so it's a good place to discover the European football".
You know it’s not the same. That being said, if PSG do manage to win day, 3/4 champions leagues in the next 10 years I’ll respect them because even with unlimited funds, it doesn’t guarantee the success.
Sure, suffice to look at Chelsea that did need 10 years to win a Champions League and City at the European stage in the last seasons.