Christopher Nkunku

Wouldn't particularly make sense to me. He isn't a #9, and most of our other current attackers are already obviously better suited to the #10 roles in Amorim's system than any other position. Meanwhile we have more obvious issues at wing-back, which I assume he wouldn't be bought to address.
 
He’s not a 9 so where would he play?
Probably that no 10 next to Bruno behind striker. We need more goals and assists. Nkunku has it in his locker.

———————— Onana —————————
—— Yoro —— de Ligt —— Martinez ——
Amad - Casemiro - Mainoo - Mazraoui
————— Bruno —— Nkunku —————
——————— Gyokeres ————————
 
Probably that no 10 next to Bruno behind striker. We need more goals and assists. Nkunku has it in his locker.

———————— Onana —————————
—— Yoro —— de Ligt —— Martinez ——
Amad - Casemiro - Mainoo - Mazraoui
————— Bruno —— Nkunku —————
——————— Gyokeres ————————
I'd rather use Amad/Garnacho/Rashford there and sign two top wing backs
 
Probably that no 10 next to Bruno behind striker. We need more goals and assists. Nkunku has it in his locker.

———————— Onana —————————
—— Yoro —— de Ligt —— Martinez ——
Amad - Casemiro - Mainoo - Mazraoui
————— Bruno —— Nkunku —————
——————— Gyokeres ————————
I see you’ve bought a new striker as well. How did he slip in?
 
I think we are much more likely to make a statement no signings in January.

I think the board will give this as a free hit for Amorim, get to know your squad, see what you can get out of them and we will see what you need in the summer.
Would be the most sensible option, also seeing as Amorim has already stated he won’t buy any Sporting players in January either.
 
Probably that no 10 next to Bruno behind striker. We need more goals and assists. Nkunku has it in his locker.

———————— Onana —————————
—— Yoro —— de Ligt —— Martinez ——
Amad - Casemiro - Mainoo - Mazraoui
————— Bruno —— Nkunku —————
——————— Gyokeres ————————

Would seem an odd way to approach squad building in the immediate term.

You have Mazraoui playing wingback on his less-favoured side. And Amad playing wingback even though he seems more obviously suited to the #10/IF role. Just to sign Nkunku who would occupy that same position that Amad, Rashford, Garnacho, Bruno and Mount all most obviously fit into.

As opposed to just signing a player to play wingback, the actual problem position in this set-up.
 
Wouldn't particularly make sense to me. He isn't a #9, and most of our other current attackers are already obviously better suited to the #10 roles in Amorim's system than any other position. Meanwhile we have more obvious issues at wing-back, which I assume he wouldn't be bought to address.

They may be better suited but I don’t see where we have the options of inside 10 in our squad which make sense.

Bruno - maybe but can’t dribble.

Amad - perfect

Garnacho - undecided, still very raw and might be better suited to wingback.

Rashford - Perfect but he’s probably finished at this club.

Zirkzee - Needs to play central with the 10’s and wingbacks running past him.

Mount - Perfect but never fit.

We only really have Amad and Bruno but I think the position needs more quality. Rashford and Mount who can play the role probably aren’t the future and aren’t playing at a level which will improve us. Which leaves Garnacho and Zirkzee as viable rotation options which leaves us light in quality.

A wingback and striker is only 1 position where is we will always play with 2 10’s.
 
The new formation is going to leave a lot of attackers twiddling their thumbs as it is. Next summer, we may want to bring in more attacking options, when we're sure which players don't fit the new formation. But I can hardly see the point in January, especially for a player that has question marks over both their ability to play in our league, and their fitness. Doubly so when you consider the lack of options for left wingback.
 
Costs a lot - check
Big unearned wages - check
Injury prone - very
Prolific - no

Yeah looks like a perfect signing.
 
I like how the new regime is still the old regime... Chelsea's unwanted, why?
 
Probably that no 10 next to Bruno behind striker. We need more goals and assists. Nkunku has it in his locker.

———————— Onana —————————
—— Yoro —— de Ligt —— Martinez ——
Amad - Casemiro - Mainoo - Mazraoui
————— Bruno —— Nkunku —————
——————— Gyokeres ————————
No Ugarte? Surely he has to play.
 
Remember being gutted when Chelsea signed him . Looked like he was going to become one of the best forwards in Europe at Red Bull. About time we got one over on chelsea after the Mount deal. But conceded he has lost a bit since the injury . If we got him for a good price not against it. Imagine he is going to want crazy wages also
 
If that is a caveat for any potential player, then it should be a hard no from the start.



Cunha would be one I'd be looking at too.

Wouldn't be cheap though, Wolves paid about 50m for him.
Just offer £70/80m for Gyokeres and be done with it get him asap.
 
For that type of player, I would prefer either Cunha or Marmoush.
Cunha would be a good signing for us and looks like his direct running would fit in with Amorim. His technique is also of a high standard.
 
He'd probably cost about the same as Gyokeres considering how much Wolves paid.
Quite likely true. I do like the look of Gyokeres but if we want to be serious why not both ? Cunha has quite a bit of versatility too. Would have to ship a couple out though and obviously we would be looking at the summer.

Either way Nkunku should not be a serious option for us we have enough injury prone players as it is.
 
Would seem an odd way to approach squad building in the immediate term.

You have Mazraoui playing wingback on his less-favoured side. And Amad playing wingback even though he seems more obviously suited to the #10/IF role. Just to sign Nkunku who would occupy that same position that Amad, Rashford, Garnacho, Bruno and Mount all most obviously fit into.

As opposed to just signing a player to play wingback, the actual problem position in this set-up.
I don’t know much about Amorim but someone mentioned that last season and this season he plays his wingback like an inverted winger. Hence why Amad and Mazraoui are in there. Amad been doing good on the right hand side recently while Mazraoui been doing good on the left side recently.
 
I'd rather use Amad/Garnacho/Rashford there and sign two top wing backs

My concern about this is that they have been disappointed in their end product and decision making in the final third. The level of our current attacking players are below average. I think we need two new attacking players.

People mentioned that Amorim’s wingback are originally midfield and wingers. I could see Amad being converted as wingback in Amorim’s system.
 
I don’t know much about Amorim but someone mentioned that last season and this season he plays his wingback like an inverted winger. Hence why Amad and Mazraoui are in there. Amad been doing good on the right hand side recently while Mazraoui been doing good on the left side recently.
The wingers in the 3-4-3 play as inverted wingers, not the wing backs.
 
Massive injuries worries and about 3 goals in his time with Chelsea? No thanks
 
Yeah he's a good player but he's too injury prone and he's not an out-and-out number 9 which is what we badly need right now. We need to stop buying Chelsea's sicknotes.
 
Feels like a terrible signing.

27 years old, big fee and big wages. Injury prone, hasn't looked as prolific as he did in Germany.

If he's not good enough for Chelsea he's not good enough for us!
 
Makes sense that we are in for him, as he doesn't answer any of the problems in our current squad.
 
For that type of player, I would prefer either Cunha or Marmoush.

Marmoush for sure, but I'm sure both would cost more and most likely it'd be a big bidding war. Nkunku we might get for a similar deal we gave them Sancho

Cunha's best season was 12 goals and 7 assists. Not sure he's got enough end product
 
Loan with an option to buy is the only way here. Anything else is too risky and our money is better spent elsewhere, like an actual striker