Telsim
Full Member
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2021
- Messages
- 5,837
That is not what I meant when I said I wanted to see Fred play more, feck's sake.
Wishing a injury on someone , well doneBlessing in disguised, sign a midfielder in January. Caceido let's go.
Recall DeanRecall Amad.
Wishing a injury on someone , well done
Feck , there goes our season. That's 2 midfielders out.
He carried on the game, probably used crutches as a precaution. Besides, he’s been nowhere near good enough for us to consider our season over if Eriksen has a knock.
Didn’t he play 5-10 minutes after the tackle, and then walk off the pitch? Hopefully just a precaution - don’t think we are talking months here.
Also, that tackle not even being worthy of a yellow is a disgrace.
Claiming there is a risk in any game and then insinuating risk of injury is not lessened if you are rested in certain games is stupid.Moaning about an injury is stupid. Every single minute of every game he plays he could get injured. The only reasonable criticism if picked up a muscle injury due to fatigue. The manager knows how tired the players are and obviously thought he could play an hour. Which he could have.
We dominated the 45 mins with a fair few chances whilst they only had one touch in the box.The first 45mins showed exactly why
He’s naive in regards to thinking he can get away without rotation in the Prem over the long haul.This is hilarious, “Naive”
Yes you’re right, performed like a brand new coach in his career to date with us
Hes not being blamed for the tackle. He's being rightly criticised for playing Eriksen in a needless game that would have eliminated this scenario for at least another game.ETH being blamed for that cretins awful tackle now I seen it all. This team isn't even close to be capable of resting players.
Sorry I don't agree we are having a tough time finishing off games even with our best team on the pitch. Having a 100kg twat running about hacking down players is a problem for the ref, who just had a mare of a game. ETH has found his group and he will stick with them.Hes not being blamed for the tackle. He's being rightly criticised for playing Eriksen in a needless game that would have eliminated this scenario for at least another game.
And the second bit is bollocks, we faced a mid table championship side. Fred or McT, or both were more than capable of starting.
I dont think we have a tough time creating chances. And I don't think we would have struggled remotely to put Reading aside if we played Fred for Eriksen yesterday.Sorry I don't agree we are having a tough time finishing off games even with our best team on the pitch. Having a 100kg twat running about hacking down players is a problem for the ref, who just had a mare of a game. ETH has found his group and he will stick with them.
I don't think anybody is pretending Carroll didn't make the tackle. He is a meat, bellend that probably should have been sent off earlier than he did.Carroll went out there looking for rough challenges in the second half, you could see how he was lurking around the pitch like a linebacker, and the blame should be laid fully at his door for the outcome of Eriksen, he should be ashamed.
It would be totally unfair to blame ETH or anyone else for the action of an opposition player who cannot control himself.
I don't think anybody is pretending Carroll didn't make the tackle. He is a meat, bellend that probably should have been sent off earlier than he did.
Thing is though, ETH is accountable for putting key players in these games. Most people see these as dead rubber games that could have been won below full strength. ETH doesn't see it that way. He sees the conjested fixture list as an opportunity to reduce the time taken to improve team chemistry and the players understanding of the system. Mainly because we're still new to the system he's trying to introduce and he's willing to risk injuries on this idea. He accepts the injury risk he's taking, even mentioned it, in some many words, in the post match presser himself.
I actually agree with ETH and fully support his approach but what we can't do is pretend he wasn't taking a risk in the first place.
But why take the risk against fecking reading. This is squarely on ETH.
Conpletely different skillset and not a replacement for eriksenBlessing in disguised, sign a midfielder in January. Caceido let's go.
Rightly criticised according to you. Then the same people are always first to blame the manager for not starting X or Y when we fail to win. I would guess the plan was to rotate half of team yesterday and another half against Nottingham. I am sure ETH knows better about the condition of the players than anyone here.Hes not being blamed for the tackle. He's being rightly criticised for playing Eriksen in a needless game that would have eliminated this scenario for at least another game.
And the second bit is bollocks, we faced a mid table championship side. Fred or McT, or both were more than capable of starting.
When we fail to win? Read the post again, I said before kick off it was abundantly obvious and there were posts in the matchday thread surprised at the choice of Eriksen.Rightly criticised according to you. Then the same people are always first to blame the manager for not starting X or Y when we fail to win. I would guess the plan was to rotate half of team yesterday and another half against Nottingham. I am sure ETH knows better about the condition of the players than anyone here.
When we fail to win? Read the post again, I said before kick off it was abundantly obvious and there were posts in the matchday thread surprised at the choice of Eriksen.
The whole manager knows better than anyone is such a bollocks argument. The best managers in history make mistakes. Ten Hag is doing a terrific job but let's not blow him off to the extent we can't reasonably critique him.
What if he only played Casemiro out of all first team midfielders and then Casey got injured because Andy Caroll is a prick? will he still be naive then? that injury wasn't due to fatigue or forcing Eriksen to play through minor injury, it's beyond the manager's control.He’s fecking naive, you don’t need to play the same team in a cup comp against reading ffs. This isn’t the Dutch league, our players will burn out at this rate in the business end of the season.
Eriksen's minutes on the pitch are managed well. Since the WC break he played 77, 61, 68, 72, 83, 90 minutes in the league and 83, 57, 30, 71 in cups. People being surprised that someone plays should not matter at all. Injuries happen, we can't wrap everyone in bubble wrap.When we fail to win? Read the post again, I said before kick off it was abundantly obvious and there were posts in the matchday thread surprised at the choice of Eriksen.
The whole manager knows better than anyone is such a bollocks argument. The best managers in history make mistakes. Ten Hag is doing a terrific job but let's not blow him off to the extent we can't reasonably critique him.
It's squarely on Andy Carroll.But why take the risk against fecking reading. This is squarely on ETH.
He’s fecking naive, you don’t need to play the same team in a cup comp against reading ffs. This isn’t the Dutch league, our players will burn out at this rate in the business end of the season.
But why take the risk against fecking reading. This is squarely on ETH.
Nah this is just daft. Those players won’t be playing midweek this week, 10 days off doesn’t help anyone. Starting them today to leave them out Wednesday was the correct call.Our line up was way stronger than it needed to be, surely everyone can agree on that. Playing too many games leads to fatigue and injury and also clearly increases risk of being badly injured by a stupid tackle which is exactly what happened last night.
Fellas like Eriksen need to be carefully managed. Playing him when not needed in the middle of an absaloutely ludicrous run of fixtures is not the way to carefully manage such players. Hopefully ETH learns from it.