FrankDrebin
Don't call me Shirley
A Forest double.
Why did Newcastle sell him?
Delete this before you're banned from NZ for sacrilege against Jonah Lomu.Possibly the greatest Kiwi sportsman of all time
Why did Newcastle sell him?
Weghorst was way worse. He scored 2 in 29. That’s less than a goal every ten games. An absolutely shocking return for a striker.He was rubbish for them. Could have persevered although it would have been a bold decision to do so.
Brought him in during January because Wilson was injured and scored 2 in 17 starting every week. Wout Weghorst at United form. Wilson with 8 in 18 that season overall.
Signed Isak the following summer and with Wilson fit again there was no place for him, just bit part minutes until they loaned him out in January then eventually sold him.
That half season at Newcastle is the only time he's really failed when playing regularly. Wilson with 18 the following season, Isak with 10 while missing quite a few through injury while Wood's minutes were reduced greatly in the first of the season before they loaned him out. Was never going to get ahead of those two.
Weghorst was way worse. He scored 2 in 29. That’s less than a goal every ten games. An absolutely shocking return for a striker.
True. Both are absolutely honking.True in terms of overall appearances, and true overall to be honest. I was using Wood's league only stats there. Wout never scored a league goal for us.
Still, minutes wise in the league:
Wood 21/22 for Newcastle = 2 in 1331
Weghorst for United = 0 in 798
Can't divide by zero so Weghorst was worse. Not good enough for Wood then either.
They only signed him to send Burnley down, he was surplus as soon as Newcastle stayed up.Why did Newcastle sell him?
They only signed him to send Burnley down, he was surplus as soon as Newcastle stayed up.
I love him but he is well down the list unfortunatelyPossibly the greatest Kiwi sportsman of all time