K2K
Full Member
Good luck with that.
Smalling admittedly is not great on the ball, but from what we've seen under Van Gaal I would assume he would fit like a glove to the high-line and rigid defensive shape of Guardiola's team. The problem for City is that their defenders lack pace and awareness to go with the aggressive press. Smalling would provide that and actually stand out foreal, from a defensive standpoint. Dominating an area high up the pitch to sustain offensive pressure is Smallings ideal setup i would say. Also, he would mostly be so close to his teammates via a triangle so his safe short-passes would be enough to keep Guardiola pleased i reckon. Im not saying Guardiola would go for him, but if he was already at City when he came in he would probably be a mainstay there i reckon. Or maybe i just touched on Guardiolas weak point
Fair enough. Agree to an extent but i think their defenders have rigid instructions on how to position themselves in those situations, which i think would also help Smalling and could maybe even remove some of Smalling's pondering on the ball etc as i believe his lack of composure is caused by a confidence-issue. Him having clear instructions might help. But of course is his passing limited even if it did improve his composure, but i don't think its even that bad. Probably too bad for Guardiola, you are rightVan Gaal recycled possession for the sake of it. Guardiola uses possession differently, so much so that I'm baffled at numerous people linking the two. They're as similar as Pulis is to Mourinho.
This season, both Stones and Otamendi have been instrumental at actively providing themselves as outlets for Ederson to release the ball (thus bypassing the press), or serving as conduits to switch the play. Replacing either one with Smalling would degrade the team's ability to withstand the press and create overloads, which would negate any positive qualities Smalling brings as a defender in a more traditional setup.
Every sane person would choose Aguero as a striker over Jesus, devoid of context. But in a Guardiola team, the latter fits better. Same concept with Smalling IMO.
Fair enough. Agree to an extent but i think their defenders have rigid instructions on how to position themselves in those situations, which i think would also help Smalling and could maybe even remove some of Smalling's pondering on the ball etc as i believe his lack of composure is caused by a confidence-issue. Him having clear instructions might help. But of course is his passing limited even if it did improve his composure, but i don't think its even that bad. Probably too bad for Guardiola, you are right
If we swap ozil for mike smalling then ed Woodward is clearly some kind of genius.
That works on the presumption that a world class centre back becomes available. Just selling him with the hope of signing a better player would be risky. Look at lindelof, people were raving about him but he looks pretty average really.He’s our worst defender in my book.
But I think everyone knows my opinion on him.
I’d take the cash and invest it in a world class CB to partner Bailly.
A few reports that Arsenal want him!
I’d be delighted if he moved on tbh. He’s ok but not great. I understand folks that like him as a squad player though.
Would you sell if reasonable offer comes in?
Lindelof was always one for the future.That works on the presumption that a world class centre back becomes available. Just selling him with the hope of signing a better player would be risky. Look at lindelof, people were raving about him but he looks pretty average really.
Well, I'm not anti smalling but ozil is a better player and we'd actually sign him rather than face competing for him in the summer window which is typically mayhem. If it was a choice then I'd rather give them mata.That'll be silly move.
Miki & Sanchez deal was indeed a smart swap since Miki isn't our main starter, and we swap attacker with a better attacker. But why would you want us to make a straight swap deal between our regular centre back who can defends better than Arsenal's defense with an attacking midfield who only has 4 months left in his contract?
This.. Our only CB that has top class arial ability..Nope. He's a good defender and our lone CB that is strong in aerial duels although he had a rough go of it against Burnley this weekend.
He'd be a beast of a CB if he wasn't so crap with the ball at his feet.
I would imagine Wenger fancies Smalling for a couple of reasons.
1) He's very fast and can recover should someone get in behind him. Arsenal plays a much higher line than United. Koscielny is also fast, but the rest of their centre backs are not.
2) He's great in the air, and bar Mertesacker, none of their defenders are brilliant there.
3) He doesn't make many mistakes compared to most defenders and keeps things simple.
4) He seems to have gotten over his worst injuries
We would be mad selling him. There's this new norm on here that "we support the team and not individual players", but the negativity on here is toxic concerning our own players. He has been our most consistent defender this season, yet people want to slag him off at every opportunity, yet failing to praise him when he does well.
Considering he would be perfect for Arsenal's high line, and he did so well under LVG's high line, I do wonder why Mourinho persists which such a low line. There is too much space between our players, and our stretched team does little favor to that. All our first choice defenders are very fast, so I don't see many attackers getting away from them. Different discussion.
Well, I'm not anti smalling but ozil is a better player and we'd actually sign him rather than face competing for him in the summer window which is typically mayhem. If it was a choice then I'd rather give them mata.
I'd argue Wenger is a poor defensive coach so it wouldn't make a huge difference. Attack is our main weakness, we don't score enough and ozil would be a real assist machine for us in the way we all hoped mata would be.We can sign Ozil in February if he actually wants to play for us. We are allowed to talk to him in February since he's going to be out of contract in the next window. With Sanchez now in the team & Bailly is still injured, I think we need Smalling now more than Ozil. Defense has been Arsenal main weakness & Smalling will only improve Arsenal's defense.
I'd argue Wenger is a poor defensive coach so it wouldn't make a huge difference. Attack is our main weakness, we don't score enough and ozil would be a real assist machine for us in the way we all hoped mata would be.
It is if you get mesut ozil, one of the best number 10's in world football for a just decent centre back. Do you disagree that ozil is a better player than smalling?Our discussion was about you think it's a genius move if we swap Smalling with Ozil. Not if we swap Mata with Ozil.
Letting go our regular centre back for a player with only 4 months left in his contract to a team who has been terrible in defense isn't a smart idea.
Because he’s just not the quality we require at United. I would never trust him in a pressure cooker situation in the semi-final or final of the Champions League against a top club because he would just shit the bed. We’re playing Stoke and Burnley and fecking Leicester and he can barely cope, what do you think will happen if we played Barcelona, Real and PS fecking G? We’ll get absolutely mauled!
A few reports that Arsenal want him!
I’d be delighted if he moved on tbh. He’s ok but not great. I understand folks that like him as a squad player though.
Would you sell if reasonable offer comes in?
It is if you get mesut ozil, one of the best number 10's in world football for a just decent centre back. Do you disagree that ozil is a better player than smalling?