Just to clarify. You’re struggling to work out why a club owned by a not very likeable yank businessman that just spunked over a billion quid on new players in two seasons - during a global economic downturn - isn’t more popular?
Well, even the if I conceded that Borglum is unlikeable aside from his American-ness, and that he owns Chelsea (which I’m not, he’s regarded pretty favorably all over the world) …
He is not the owner. He is ONE of the representatives of the ownership group. A diverse group from several different countries, including a poor refugee whose family escaped Iran and worked his way up to where he is in Eghbali.
People cheer Arsenal and they are owned by the wal mart vulture… a truly despicable person.
People are hyped about Newcastle even …. And … c’mon.
When it was announced Barcelona had been bribing refs people talked about the only good thing being it kept Chelsea from winning another CL.
The people in Britain who are opposed to Chelsea openly cheered the fact the people that worked in their cafeterias weren’t even allowed to receive their paychecks during the still unexplainable complete government freeze (lawsuit still pending)
At a certain point you have to ask: are Chelsea the bad ones here?
What people don’t like is that the club survived and continued. The refs even volunteered to step up and openly as
It to fixing at least one match for sure after the takeover…. And we’re still here.
There are a few teams I don’t like. I don’t like Arsenal, but I want to do better than them fairly. I wouldn’t want to find out there had been an organized effort to limit them held at higher levels, or an agreement to largely look the other way that led to players getting hurt. Maybe that makes me weird.