TheLord
Full Member
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2018
- Messages
- 1,859
They need a CF and a CB above everything else.
We need a striker too. We are crying out for oneWe've far too many players, that is for sure.
Just need CB, not for ridiculous price. Ampadu should also get a chance.
Kovacic isn't inconsistent.
How did they play? Missed the game
He's a consistent 8/10 player. Probably our best midfielder. The only thing that is inconsistent about him is his injury record.Ok, you would know better than myself, it is an impression I have gained from watching 10-15 Chelsea games a season. I really like him as a player when he is on, why has he struggled to hold down a starting spot? Injuries?
How did they play? Missed the game
Whatever broja did in his little time impressed me lot more than mount and Kai in their time. But we are not upto speed. You can add kouly too in good performance list.Much the same as last season. Plenty of possession but did little with it. Attack lacks a focal point and they are crying out for a CF replacement for Lukaku.
Silva and Sterling played well. The game was very average though and a draw would have been the fairer result given what Everton created.
Two games are never the same.I pray we have the greatest week of training we have ever had before playing against Conte’s Spurs. Todays performance would have been us getting an ass kicking against them.
Opening match at Stamford bridge I doubt spurs will do any thing meaningful. We will win it easily.I pray we have the greatest week of training we have ever had before playing against Conte’s Spurs. Todays performance would have been us getting an ass kicking against them.
Settle down lad.A horrible game to watch.
New season and old sensations.
Tuchel, you need to change the chip mate, focus on the job because you have a lot to do, claiming signings and insisting on this soporific and inefficient model will not finnish well.
If there wasn't a penalty we wouldn't score a goal even if the game lasted 250 minutes.
Havertz and Mount were two ghosts on the pitch.
Sterling was the only one able to unbalance a bit, the only one who tried, back there the pure class of Silva.
More than signing new players we need to change the system and style.
Our bench today had Kepa, Cucurella, Chalobah, Kovacic, Pulisic, RLC, Gallagher, Zyiech, Broja.
Either Tuchel turns this around or it's impossible to watch two hours or four hours of this horror a week.
You have one of the best squads in the world.
Started time wasting when the clock hit 55 minutes.
First win away to Everton in 4 attempts. Koulibali, Sterling and Cookie looked decent.
Good at the back, disjointed upfront. The game was gash.
ThanksMuch the same as last season. Plenty of possession but did little with it. Attack lacks a focal point and they are crying out for a CF replacement for Lukaku.
Silva and Sterling played well. The game was very average though and a draw would have been the fairer result given what Everton created.
The age obsession is too much at times. While i'd agree Azpi is waning and should have a more reduced role going forward the other 2 are still playing at an insanely high level.I find this Chelsea side pretty unconvincing honestly. That back three has an average age of 33 with almost no cover, and Jorginho and Kante are both past their best. They still have some top players in attack, and Reece James remains an excellent player, but with a shaky defence and no recognised striker, I think they could have a tough season by their own standards.
You say he'll have a reduced role, but who's covering for him? By my count you have three senior CB's at the club right now. I know you're chasing Fofana, but the clock is ticking and Leicester are pulling a Maguire on you.The age obsession is too much at times. While i'd agree Azpi is waning and should have a more reduced role going forward the other 2 are still playing at an insanely high level.
You say he'll have a reduced role, but who's covering for him? By my count you have three senior CB's at the club right now. I know you're chasing Fofana, but the clock is ticking and Leicester are pulling a Maguire on you.
The age obsession is too much at times. While i'd agree Azpi is waning and should have a more reduced role going forward the other 2 are still playing at an insanely high level.
Think Tuchel gets away with a lot of ‘boring’ football. This was probably the worst match of the weekend till now. Also, it’s clear that Chelsea need a striker but what type is the biggest question. So far none of Lukaku, Werner or Havertz have looked any good in the system. If they were to bring in Ronaldo, it will make them even more static with an addition of frustration filled arm waving.
Can Chelsea fans shed any light on spending over 50/60 million on a left-back when you already have Chilwell? That's over 100 million on let-backs alone. It seems Chelsea are going the United route with the new owners. Marina seems to be a miss already just as we missed Gill and Sir Alex in the recruiting department.
Werner looked great for the system, but the issue was that he couldn't score to save his life. Still, they were much more dangerous as a team because of his runs and ability to drag the opposition defence. As Pep said at the time the problem playing against Chelsea was that they were playing so wide thanks to their wingbacks, but at the same time, and thanks to Werner, who was making constant runs behind CB's could switch the play and go direct almost instantly if you press them. Now, they are far more predictable and easier to defend with a lot of sideways passes relying mostly on their wingbacks to be the biggest attacking threat.
Why did they moved from previous formula is a mystery because am pretty certain (despite all Werner flaws) that they created more chances and were much more fluid. Even if you want to upgrade Werner (which is logical) certainly you would want a similiar type of player as him and not go for Lukaku or play Havertz in his role. Not sure who would that be in today's game, but peak Luis Suarez would be perfect fit for example.
At this point, you have to question Tuchel as well. He went from being one of more creative and attacking coaches in Dortmund to one of the most conservative and defensive ones. While it's still a great formula for cup competitions no way they can challenge for a title playing in this manner. Either he will find the right striker, shake up things differently or this could easily be his last season in Chelsea.
Werner looked great for the system, but the issue was that he couldn't score to save his life. Still, they were much more dangerous as a team because of his runs and ability to drag the opposition defence. As Pep said at the time the problem playing against Chelsea was that they were playing so wide thanks to their wingbacks, but at the same time, and thanks to Werner, who was making constant runs behind CB's could switch the play and go direct almost instantly if you press them. Now, they are far more predictable and easier to defend with a lot of sideways passes relying mostly on their wingbacks to be the biggest attacking threat.
Why did they moved from previous formula is a mystery because am pretty certain (despite all Werner flaws) that they created more chances and were much more fluid. Even if you want to upgrade Werner (which is logical) certainly you would want a similiar type of player as him and not go for Lukaku or play Havertz in his role. Not sure who would that be in today's game, but peak Luis Suarez would be perfect fit for example.
Not really a mystery. We stopped playing wide a lot through Chilwell and James because they both had got injured and the backups were nowhere near capable of doing the same role.
I think with Chillwell coming back to fitness & Cucarella coming in, we'll see a return to a much "wider" play as we have a bit of balance on the flanks again.
Werner looked great for the system, but the issue was that he couldn't score to save his life. Still, they were much more dangerous as a team because of his runs and ability to drag the opposition defence. As Pep said at the time the problem playing against Chelsea was that they were playing so wide thanks to their wingbacks, but at the same time, and thanks to Werner, who was making constant runs behind CB's could switch the play and go direct almost instantly if you press them. Now, they are far more predictable and easier to defend with a lot of sideways passes relying mostly on their wingbacks to be the biggest attacking threat.
Why did they moved from previous formula is a mystery because am pretty certain (despite all Werner flaws) that they created more chances and were much more fluid. Even if you want to upgrade Werner (which is logical) certainly you would want a similiar type of player as him and not go for Lukaku or play Havertz in his role. Not sure who would that be in today's game, but peak Luis Suarez would be perfect fit for example.
At this point, you have to question Tuchel as well. He went from being one of more creative and attacking coaches in Dortmund to one of the most conservative and defensive ones. While it's still a great formula for cup competitions no way they can challenge for a title playing in this manner. Either he will find the right striker, shake up things differently or this could easily be his last season in Chelsea.
Will the issue of having someone like Werner running centrally not still be there though as @Jim Beam suggests or do you not see that as a problem?
From yesterday I think Sterling is wasted in that central area and would be much more useful off someone else. I was surprised to see Broja and Havertz both shunted left.
Not really a mystery. We stopped playing wide a lot through Chilwell and James because they both had got injured and the backups were nowhere near capable of doing the same role.
I think with Chillwell coming back to fitness & Cucarella coming in, we'll see a return to a much "wider" play as we have a bit of balance on the flanks again.
Interesting. I don’t I’ve watched enough of Chelsea when Werner started as the main striker but do recall him always looking dangerous barring the goals. The striker market is quit shallow right now so can’t even think of a striker who can be a prolific version of Werner.
Was questioning why you moved from Werner or to be more precise why you didn't upgrade him with a similiar type of striker.
Think Tuchel gets away with a lot of ‘boring’ football.
Werner has barely played as a striker for Tuchel, because he's kinda shit at it in a side who has a lot of possession.
All his best stuff came from out wide where he had a little more space and didn't have his back to goal.
I guess the manager has decided the good that Werner's runs do (and they are very effective) are not worth everything else Werner brings to the table.
We'll see how the season progresses. I don't think Sterling is wasted there at all, he had a goal disallowed (replacing Werner nicely!) and another denied by a fantastic last ditch tackle. If he plays like that every game he'll be fine.