charlenefan
Far less insightful than the other Charley
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2005
- Messages
- 33,052
This type of journalism is so funny
is winning the transfer window just who signs the most players? I thought it was who signed the best players?
This type of journalism is so funny
is winning the transfer window just who signs the most players? I thought it was who signed the best players?
Who gives us a feck if they are 10th. They won this transfer window!
We've surely won that as well.
The number of signings they've made since the summer is more than double the amount of wins they have this seasonSo this means they have now signed in the summer and winter:
Sterling
Aubameyang
Fofana
Koulibaly
Casedei
Hutchinson
Chukwuemeka
Cucurella
Zakaria
Slonina
Mudryk
Fofana 2
Santos
Felix
Fernandez
Madueke
Gusto
Badiashile
That is 18! new fecking signings. They still have 18 other players under contract for next season, not including Kante who is likely to sign a new one. To say this is unprecedented is not enough.
I swear they don't even need at least half of the signings they made.
Not particularly.Remains to be seen doesn't it? Trossard looked good for Arsenal the other night against City
Oi.
Do you mind not posting Ipswich videos next time you want to make your point!
It'll be interesting to see how it impacts them if they don't finish in the top four now. Any idea on the wages they're paying these new players?
Well yeah because it's spread out over probably double the usual contract length.Reportedly they are fairly low base fees with built in incentives. Mudryk is on £5m per year, or about £97k per week.
You’d think sales would be amortised over the remaining length of the contract just like purchases. Odd.
It'll be interesting to see how it impacts them if they don't finish in the top four now. Any idea on the wages they're paying these new players?
With the Nkunku deal they've spent over £600m this season.
Absolutely fecking obscene.
Without the Nkunku deal and assuming Enzo is bought for €120m they'll only be 25m short of a round 1 billion in the last 3 seasons.
So … behind the curve of their normal spending when they take over a team still then. Great!Without the Nkunku deal and assuming Enzo is bought for €120m they'll only be 25m short of a round 1 billion in the last 3 seasons.
We just passed United on the 5 year net spend table.Yeah I remember the 2020 summer when everyone was skint because of covid and yet they spent a shit ton, mostly on a load of shite, but still.
Even when compared to City and us and Liverpool and whoever else, it's absolutely fecking obscene.
We just passed United on the 5 year net spend table.
Chelsea: 553m
United: 533m
There was a clear gap between United’s net spend and everyone else’s prior to that.
You'll soon come down. You have sellable assets that want to leave. We have Maguire.We just passed United on the 5 year net spend table.
Chelsea: 553m
United: 533m
There was a clear gap between United’s net spend and everyone else’s prior to that.
How much of that money did the club earn?We just passed United on the 5 year net spend table.
Chelsea: 553m
United: 533m
There was a clear gap between United’s net spend and everyone else’s prior to that.
As shit as Chelsea have been, I can't see either of them two getting a game.
This type of journalism is so funny
This is all so stupid. The majority of big signings doesn’t live up to the expectations. Good luck moving them on 593 year contracts