Castia
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2011
- Messages
- 19,452
Doing some good business this lot. Bit of pressure on Frank though after spending what will be well over 200m by the end of the transfer window, they’ll be expected to challenge next season.
I think Chelsea's defensive problem is mostly down to how bad their goalkeeper has been.A new defensive coach could he just as vital as a GK! That would be very sensible from Lampard in my view. He is an intelligent guy and very well spoken. If he stays humble and recognizes weaknesses, he could have a very good season.
Pulisic was purchased 18 months ago. Kovacic was already at the club and just made permanent.
The point still stands, we've spent a feck tonne of cash whilst they were spending nothing and offloading the best footballer in the league. We even bought Bruno in in January in order to try get past them in the league last season.
They were always going to have a big summer, they have spent very little whilst making loads of money off Hazard.
It's funny to see people say this now when last summer after our signings and them losing Hazard and appointing fat Frank, so many expected us to pretty easily finish above them. it is also largely irrelevant, you can't simply ignore the vast sums we've already spent and go "oh look Chelsea are spending all that money they've saved up by not buying any players and selling Hazard, we should do the exact same even though we already spent that much ourselves!"
Feels like Chelsea's transfer ban worked in their favor. It allowed their young players to get game time and develop chemistry with the established first-team squad. By the end of the season, they knew exactly what they needed to improve the squad while having a lot of money to spend. I would be surprised if they don't challenge for the league next season and/or go deep in the CL. They have a complete squad.
We have spent a shit tonne more money than Chelsea in the last five or six years.
Yeah completely agree.But none of that was relevant to my point, which was that Chelses are currently compensating for having only acquired a single first team player (Pulisic) in the last 18 months after selling the PL's best player, whereas in that same period we have spent loads of money for Ole. It simply can't be excused when taking this summer into account. They came into it from a position of having loads of cash sitting there from selling Hazard, Morata etc. We came into it from a net spend of ~120m odd over the last year.
How poor we've been in the transfer market when it comes to buying the players we do buy wasn't being disputed, though most on here seem to say that our signings under Ole were all great so.. which is it?
I can't emphasize how true your first point in.
Lampard was always going to look towards integrating the young players but the ban forced him to rely on the young players perhaps more than he would have otherwise. They have now played a full EPL season and integrated into the first team, perhaps a year or two ahead of their curve.
Who will sign him? He is going to be cheap with his transfer fee and wages.There's a vanishingly small chance Kepa is playing for us next season. The writing is on the wall for him.
Who will sign him? He is going to be cheap with his transfer fee and wages.
Maybe not, who knows. Football isn't played on paper.They're going to be ridiculously good to watch next season with that front 4.
cnuts
I think Chelsea's defensive problem is mostly down to how bad their goalkeeper has been.
Statistically they were 3rd in the least amount of shots conceded per game in the league behind Liverpool and City.
But they are 10th in the most amount of goals conceded in the league, this mostly down to the goalkeeper having a measly 54% save percentage.
So a change of keeper is more important than a new defensive coach or even a new CB
I’d love to know the science behind this.Their new signings would improve them by at least 20 points, here's the detail breakdown:
- Werner - 5 points
- Ziyech - 3 points
- Chilwell - 3 points
- Silva - 3 points
- Havertz - 6 points
Their new signings would improve them by at least 20 points, here's the detail breakdown:
- Werner - 5 points
- Ziyech - 3 points
- Chilwell - 3 points
- Silva - 3 points
- Havertz - 6 points
It also gave him the time to evaluate those academy players coming through. Naturally only some of them would play well enough to stake their claim as an outright first team starter, the rest will either fall by the wayside and be shipped out or they'll find their place in the squad as good role players. Having the academy supplement the first team is what allows us to spend money on top talent directly improving the first team.
There's no chance we could afford to buy Havertz, Werner, Chilwell and Ziyech in one summer if we were also in the market for squad fillers like Zappacosta, Batshuayi and Bakayoko, we'd probably have ended up settling for Leon Bailey, Dembele from Lyon, Richarlison etc
Find it amusing how much hype the media and Chelsea fans are having over their new front 4, as if they think they are going to hit it off immediately. I'm also not really convinced about Ziyech either, who's spent his entire life playing in the dutch league.
That's why I find it amusing. I'm not saying its wrong to be excited, but past experience has shown me that what looks amazing on paper does not always translate onto the pitch the way you'd expect, at least not immediately.Be honest mate, would you not be hyped if United had signed 4 players in one summer to massively improve your first team?
By who? I don't see press giving them a hard time if they manage top 3, just because they are spending money. Press will be busy focusing on how United have screwed up.Doing some good business this lot. Bit of pressure on Frank though after spending what will be well over 200m by the end of the transfer window, they’ll be expected to challenge next season.
Please don't post such posts. This place will be too toxic otherwise.Chelsea are doing pretty smart business here. I am also surprised to see people starting to complain they are also attempting to 'buy the league' again. From where I am sitting, they are well within budget.
Let's look at their spending from Jan 2019:
In
Pulisic - £58m
Kovacic - £40m
Ziyech - £37m
Werner - £47m
*Chilwell - £50m
*Harvetz - £80m
*Silva - Free
(*tbc signings/fees)
Spend - £312m (approx.)
Out
Hazard - £88m + £12m (add ons) - £100m (I think £100m feels about right from all reports about the structure of the deal. That said, could be as high as £130m or as low as £88m)
Morata - £7m loan fee plus £47m final - £54m
Luiz - £8m
Aina - £9m
Kalas - £8m
Hector - £8m
Nathan - £2.7m
Da Silva - £2.5m
Pasalic - £13.5m
Omeruo - £4m
Fabregas - £8m
Income £217m (approx.)
So in total, since January 2019 they have a net spend of approximately £95m. However, this doesn't take into account loan fees they have been getting for Bakayoko/Pasalic, whilst on top of this they will have some further money coming in for the deadwood that they have on there books that will go this Summer.
For me, Barkley will go for £20m+, Emerson £15m+, Zouma £30m+, Batshuayi £10m+. Then you have players like Kante and Jorginho who may leave that will rank in good fees. I mean if Kante went and they sold the above players they'll probably be in profit.
Personally, I still do not think they'll win the league as whilst I expect Silva to do something similar to Blanc, their defence still looks not quite right and I expect that they are using him as a bridge to next season. GK is also a massive issue, in Kepa they have the most expensive liability in the league at £141m (his fee plus wages for 7 years). So, I expect them to only get a GK most would consider a GK2 to bridge them like Silva at CB and the board may ask Lampard to try and play Kepa into form (which I doubt will happen as he looks a completely busted flush) and if he doesn't they sort GK along with CB in Summer 21.
Either way, I would say they are set for a good 10-15+ points on this season minimum and they will do it for virtually a zero net spend.
That's why I find it amusing. I'm not saying its wrong to be excited, but past experience has shown me that what looks amazing on paper does not always translate onto the pitch the way you'd expect, at least not immediately.
I hear you mate, but what alternative would you suggest. A ball hasn't been kicked yet so we're evaluating it based how they might perform on paper.
Law of averages would suggest at least one or two will have an underwhelming impact, but until such time all we can do really is get hyped and excited for what the new season could potentially hold in store.
You won't want to hear this, but I think a big chunk of that money should've been spent on a CB, a rock to build your foundation on. The teams that Lampard himself played in were always solid at the back, and yet, with the imminent signing of Chilwell, it looks like he is more interested in building an attacking side to try and outscore the opponent. You already had a pretty decent functioning team, scoring goals wasn't a big issue until the end of the season, so I didn't see a need to completely revamp the attack.I hear you mate, but what alternative would you suggest. A ball hasn't been kicked yet so we're evaluating it based how they might perform on paper.
Law of averages would suggest at least one or two will have an underwhelming impact, but until such time all we can do really is get hyped and excited for what the new season could potentially hold in store.
You won't want to hear this, but I think a big chunk of that money should've been spent on a CB, a rock to build your foundation on. The teams that Lampard himself played in were always solid at the back, and yet, with the imminent signing of Chilwell, it looks like he is more interested in building an attacking side to try and outscore the opponent. You already had a pretty decent functioning team, scoring goals wasn't a big issue until the end of the season, so I didn't see a need to completely revamp the attack.
You think we're done spending? Oh my sweet summer child.
You won't want to hear this, but I think a big chunk of that money should've been spent on a CB, a rock to build your foundation on. The teams that Lampard himself played in were always solid at the back, and yet, with the imminent signing of Chilwell, it looks like he is more interested in building an attacking side to try and outscore the opponent. You already had a pretty decent functioning team, scoring goals wasn't a big issue until the end of the season, so I didn't see a need to completely revamp the attack.
Goalkeeper is a needs must imo.I agree but who realistically is available? Upamecano perhaps, but he's still young and not fully developed; another year at RBL will do him a world of good. Getting Thiago Silva on a short term free is ideal; we take advantage of the COVID crisis to make opportunistic deals for attackers we'd otherwise be second favourites for (e.g. Havertz, Werner) and wait until next summer to push for a top class CB.
Goalkeeper is a needs must imo.
If anything we should keep an eye on arsenals martinez with leno coming back from injury is he happy to go back to the bench.
Spain is bleeding money after Covid 19. Especially when it comes to spending money on a goal keeper that can't dive to his left hand side.He'll go back to Spain somewhere, be it on loan or permanently. Valencia have been mooted but they're a trainwreck right now so who knows.
Big pressure on Lampard to deliver this season now. If they get a goalkeeper then I think they'll be up there, but I still think they're 3rd favorites behind Liverpool and City for the title.