Withnail
Full Member
These automated offsides are a load of bollox.
Ruling out a goal over width of a gnats cock is a piss-take.
Ruling out a goal over width of a gnats cock is a piss-take.
They look like all stars teams compared to us.City and PSG are two poor sides.
Remember when we beat City...They look like all stars teams compared to us.
Yeah, what a nice goal that was.These automated offsides are a load of bollox.
Ruling out a goal over width of a gnats cock is a piss-take.
Offside is offside.These automated offsides are a load of bollox.
Ruling out a goal over width of a gnats cock is a piss-take.
Garnacho role modelSterling has mastered the art of running straight into defenders. It’s hilarious to watch when it’s not your own attacks he’s ruining 10x a game.
Offside is offside.
Simple as that reallyOffside is offside.
You can't disagree it's factualI disagree completely.
What was the point of bringing in the law?
Those two players were essentially level. Did the attacker gain a material advantage in that situation?
Please hold on. I beg you!Yeah, I did not expect this
You can't disagree it's factual
With our onslaught after the first not bearing any fruit i was beginning to expect we lose by two goals.. just not in the first half already. That pen was stupid and unnecessary.Omg 2-0
Personally, I'm glad offside is one of the very few absolutely binary decisions in football. You're offside or you aren't, something that is exceedingly easy to checkYou definetly can if you want to discuss the nuance of it.
Worst rule change in football history. There was no major issue to solve.
That's what the rule is currently. Onside or offside, not really debatable.You definetly can if you want to discuss the nuance of it.
Worst rule change in football history. There was no major issue to solve.
These automated offsides are a load of bollox.
Ruling out a goal over width of a gnats cock is a piss-take.
Exactly, the line has to be drawn somewhere.I don't get this, ok so we allow a gnats cock offside now, then the next one which is 2 gnats cocks offside will be "well it's only a gnats cock off past what we allow" as we are used to it being atleast one gnats cock off anyway. It would never end.
Yeah, I was already cursing us for fecking up a 4 on 2. Braindead challenge, Stengs would've picked up the ball near the sideline.With our onslaught after the first not bearing any fruit i was beginning to expect we lose by two goals.. just not in the first half already. That pen was stupid and unnecessary.
You can't disagree it's factual
Still though I am not happy he's playing Timber, unsure as to why can't play Tierney. Who in no way would struggle against fecking Zagreb! One more injury to our backline and we're done.Shame about Calafiori. Looked like a superb signing at the time but he seems to be constantly struggling with injuries.
What a rebelI can do what I like.
Offside was judged by the eye in past and something like that couldn't have been judged offside accurately and probably would have been allowed in most cases as the players are side by side.
Technology has changed things and this automated stuff is judging it down to the absurd granularity of millimetres which couldn't have been done before. For me that means the law should be revisited, now that we have the benefit of technology, to decide what is deemed an unfair advantage and what isn't.
You have to think about the spirit of the law, why it was brought it and if in fact there is any material advantage to the attacker in a situation like that.
Do you really think a goal should be disallowed in that situation and that it's good for the game?
Personally, I'm glad offside is one of the very few absolutely binary decisions in football. You're offside or you aren't, something that is exceedingly easy to check
That's what the rule is currently. Onside or offside, not really debatable.
Talking about what you want it to be is a different conversation.
The semi-auto offsides are great. That would take PL VAR about 1-2 mins to decide.
Is Andy Madley involved?Celtic have had 3 goals ruled out and a penalty saved? What the feck
What a rebel
It’s not because of when the ball is released from the passers foot. How do you know how accurate that isYou can't disagree it's factual
I'm not going to bother debating you with that attitude to be honest.Go on give me another smiley instead of bothering to read my post.
YesIt’s not because of when the ball is released from the passers foot. How do you know how accurate that is
Another team went into second half two goals down just yesterday... Sadly we don't have that big Flick energyYeah, I was already cursing us for fecking up a 4 on 2. Braindead challenge, Stengs would've picked up the ball near the sideline.
A quick 2-1 and I see us losing still. Our season is a bit like that